Butterflies in and for conservation: Trends and Prospects
In: Israel Journal of Ecology and EvolutionSearch for other papers by GUY PE’ER in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by JOSEF SETTELE in
Current site
Google Scholar
Butterflies serve as a focal group in conservation worldwide, not only in terms of the efforts toward their protection, but also in terms of their wide use as bioindicators for identifying ecological trends and for advancing conservation theory. Further, significant involvement of scientists in applied-conservation is aided by the public's interest in butterflies. In this introductory paper to the compendium we delineate several areas where the vast knowledge on butterflies, or their charisma, can be used to advance conservation. These include: (a) integrating small-scale and large-scale approaches; (b) expanding the extent of scientific networks and standardizing conservation approaches; (c) integrating butterflies into global change scenarios; (d) extending the use of models; and (e) strengthening the link between science and applied conservation. A main aim of this compendium it to advance the latter.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Harrison, S. 1991. Local extinction in a metapopulation context: an empirical evaluation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 42: 73-88.
-
Hartley, S., Kunin, W. E. 2003. Scale dependency of rarity, extinction risk, and conservation priority. Conservation Biology 17: 1559-1570.
-
Spangenberg, J. H. 2007. Integrated scenarios for assessing biodiversity risks. Sustainable Development 15: 343-356.
-
Thomas, C. D., Mallorie, H. C. 1985. Rarity, species richness and conservation: butterflies of the Atlas mountains in Morocco. Biological Conservation 33: 95-117.
-
Ehrlich, P. R., Murphy, D. D., Singer, M. C., Sherwood, C. B., White, R. R., Brown, I. L. 1980. Extinction, reduction, stability and increase: the responses of checkerspot butterfly populations to the California drought. Oecologia 46: 101-105.
-
Fleishman, E., Murphy, D. D., Brussard, P. E. 2000. A new method for selection of umbrella species for conservation planning. Ecological Applications 10: 569-579.
-
Forman, R. T. T. 1995. Land mosaics: the ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
-
Grill, A., Cleary, D. F. R. 2003. Diversity patterns in butterfly communities of the Greek nature reserve Dadia. Biological Conservation 114: 427-436.
-
Grimm, V. 1999. Ten years of individual-based modelling in ecology: what have we learned and what could we learn in the future? Ecological Modelling 115: 129-148.
-
Grimm, V., Railsback, S. F. 2005. Individual-based modeling and ecology. Princeton series in theoretical and computational biology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
-
Guisan, A., Thuiller, W. 2005. Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecology Letters 8: 993-1009.
-
Haddad, N. M. 1999a. Corridor and distance effects on interpatch movements: a landscape experiment with butterflies. Ecological Applications 9: 612-622.
-
Haddad, N. M. 1999b. Corridor use predicted from behaviors at habitat boundaries. American Naturalist 153: 215-227.
-
Hanski, I. 1991. Single-species metapopulation dynamics: concepts, models and observations. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 42: 17-38.
-
Hanski, I., Kuussaari, M., Nieminen, M. 1994. Metapopulation structure and migration in the butterfly Melitaea cinxia.Ecology 75: 747-762.
-
Hanski, I., Moilanen, A., Pakkala, T., Kuussaari, M. 1996. The quantitative incidence function model and persistence of an endangered butterfly metapopulation. Conservation Biology 10: 578-590.
-
Heikkinen, R. K., Luoto, M., Araujo, M. B., Virkkala, R., Thuiller, W., Sykes, M. T. 2006. Methods and uncertainties in bioclimatic envelope modeling under climate change. Progress in Physical Geography 30: 751-777.
-
Heikkinen, R. K., Luoto, M., Virkkala, R., Pearson, R. G., Korber, J. H. 2007a. Biotic interactions improve prediction of boreal bird distributions at macro-scales. Global Ecology and Biogeography 16: 754-763.
-
Heikkinen, R. K., Luoto, M., Kuussaari, M., Toivonen, T. 2007b. Modelling the spatial distribution of a threatened butterfly: impacts of scale and statistical technique. Landscape and Urban Planning 79: 347-357.
-
Hein, S., Binzenhoefer, B., Poethke, H.-J., Biedermann, R., Settele, J., Schroeder, B. 2007. The generality of habitat suitability models: a practical test with two insect groups. Basic and Applied Ecology 8: 310-320.
-
Hill, J. K., Thomas, C. D., Lewis, O. T. 1996. Effects of habitat patch size and isolation on dispersal by Hesperia comma butterflies: implications for metapopulation structure. Journal of Animal Ecology 65: 725-735.
-
Hopkinson, P., Travis, J. M. J., Evans, J., Gregory, R. D., Telfer, M. G., Williams, P. H. 2001. Flexibility and the use of indicator taxa in the selection of sites for nature reserves. Biodiversity and Conservation 10: 271-285.
-
Hovestadt, T., Nowicki, P. 2008. Investigating movement within irregularly shaped patches: Analysis of mark-release-recapture data using randomization procedures. Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution 54: 137-154, this issue.
-
Howard, P. C., Viskanic, P., Davenport, T. R. B., Kigenyi, F. W., Baltzer, M., Dickinson, C. J., Lwanga, J. S., Matthews, R. A., Balmford, A. 1998. Complementarity and the use of indicator groups for reserve selection in Uganda. Nature 394: 472-475.
-
Johst, K., Drechsler, M., Thomas, J. A., Settele, J. 2006. Influence of mowing on the persistence of two endangered large blue butterfly species. Journal of Applied Ecology 43: 333-342.
-
Kerr, J. T. 2001. Butterfly species richness patterns in Canada: energy, heterogeneity, and the potential consequences of climate change. Conservation Ecology 5: U131-U147.
-
Kerr, J. T., Sugar, A., Packer, L. 2000. Indicator taxa, rapid biodiversity assessment, and nestedness in an endangered ecosystem. Conservation Biology 14: 1726-1734.
-
K�hn, E., Feldmann, R., Harpke, A., Hirneisen, N., Musche, M., Leopold, P., Settele, J. 2008. Getting the public involved in butterfly conservation: lessons learned from a new monitoring scheme in Germany. Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution 54: 89-103, this issue.
-
Kuussaari, M., Nieminen, M., Hanski, I. 1996. An experimental study of migration in the Glanville fritillary butterfly Melitaea cinxia.Journal of Animal Ecology 65: 791-801.
-
Ladwig, M., Settele, J. 2005. Bye, bye, butterfly (original: "Bye, bye, Schmetterling")—TV documentation (abstract). In: K�hn, E., Feldmann, R., Thomas, J. A., Settele, J., eds. Studies on the ecology and conservation of butterflies in Europe, Vol. I: General concepts and case studies. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia/Moscow, pp. 3-4.
-
Launer, A. E., Murphy, D. D. 1994. Umbrella species and the conservation of habitat fragments: a case of a threatened butterfly and a vanishing grassland ecosystem. Biological Conservation 69: 145-153.
-
Lindenmayer, D. B., Franklin, J. F., eds. 2002. Conserving forest biodiversity: a comprehensive multiscaled approach. Island Press, Washington, DC.
-
Andelman, S. J., Fagan, W. F. 2000. Umbrellas and flagships: efficient conservation surrogates or expensive mistakes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America 97: 5954-5959.
-
Araujo, M. B., Luoto, M. 2007. The importance of biotic interactions for modeling species distributions under climate change. Global Ecology and Biogeography 16: 743-753.
-
Araujo, M. B., Guisan, A. 2006. Five (or so) challenges for species distribution modelling. Journal of Biogeography 33: 1677-1688.
-
Baguette, M. 2003. Long distance dispersal and landscape occupancy in a metapopulation of the cranberry fritillary butterfly. Ecography 26: 153-160.
-
Bergman, K. O., Askling, J., Ekberg, O., Ignell, H., Wahlman, H., Milberg, P. 2004. Landscape effects on butterfly assemblages in an agricultural region. Ecography 27: 619-628.
-
Betrus, C. J., Fleishman, E., Blair, R. B. 2005. Cross-taxonomic potential and spatial transferability of an umbrella species index. Journal of Environmental Management 74: 79-87.
-
Binzenh�fer, B., Biedermann, R., Settele, J., Schroeder, B. 2008. Connectivity compensates for low habitat quality and small patch size in the butterfly Cupido minimus.Ecological Research 23: 259-269.
-
Boggs, C. L., Watt, W. B., Ehrlich, P. R. 2003. Butterflies: ecology and evolution taking flight. Universitry of Chicago Press, Chicago.
-
Brown, J. K. S., Freitas, A. V. L. 2000. Atlantic Forest butterflies: indicators for landscape conservation. Biotropica 32: 934-956.
-
Conradt, L., Roper, T. J., Thomas, C. D. 2001. Dispersal behaviour of individuals in metapopulations of two British butterflies. Oikos 95: 416-424.
-
Dennis, R. L. H. 1993. Butterflies and climate change. Manchester University Press, Manchester.
-
Drechsler, M., Grimm, V., Mysiak, J., Waetzold, F. 2007a. Differences and similarities between ecological and economic models for biodiversity conservation. Ecological Economics 62: 232-241.
-
Drechsler, M., Waetzold, F., Johst, K., Bergmann, H., Settele, J. 2007b. A model-based approach for designing cost-effective compensation payments for conservation of endangered species in real landscapes. Biological Conservation 140: 174-186.
-
Ehrlich, P. R., Hanski, I. 2004. On the wings of checkerspots: a model system for population biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
-
Thomas, C. D., Singer, M. C., Boughton, D. A. 1996. Catastrophic extinction of population sources in a butterfly metapopulation. American Naturalist 148: 957-975.
-
Thomas, J. A. 2005. Monitoring change in the abundance and distribution of insects using butterflies and other indicator groups. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 360: 339-357.
-
Thomas, J. A., Telfer, M. G., Roy, D. B., Preston, C. D., Greenwood, J. J. D., Asher, J., Fox, R., Clarke, R. T., Lawton, J. H. 2004. Comparative losses of British butterflies, birds and plants and the global extinction crisis. Science 303: 1879-1881.
-
Thomas, J. A., R. T., C., Randle, Z., Simcox, D. J., Schoenrogge, K., Elmes, G. W., Wardlaw, J. C., Settele, J. 2005. Maculinea and myrmecophiles as sensitive indicators of grassland butterflies (umbrella species), ants (keystone species) and other invertebrates. In: Settele, J., K�hn, E., Thomas, J. A., eds. Studies on the ecology and conservation of butterflies in Europe, Vol. 2: Species ecology along a European gradient: Maculinea butterflies as a Model. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia/Moscow, pp. 28-31.
-
Ulbrich, K., Drechsler, M., Waetzold, F., Johst, K., Settele, J. 2008. A software tool for designing cost-effective compensation payments for conservation measures. Environmental Modelling and Software 23: 122-123.
-
van Dyck, H., Baguette, M. 2005. Dispersal behaviour in fragmented landscapes: routine or special movements? Basic and Applied Ecology 6: 535-545.
-
van Swaay, C., van Strien, A. 2005. Using butterfly monitoring data to develop a European grassland butterfly indicator. In: K�hn, E., Thomas, J., Feldmann, R., Settele, J., eds. Studies on the ecology and conservation of butterflies in Europe. Vol. 1. General concepts and case studies. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia/Moscow, pp. 106-108.
-
van Swaay, C., Warren, M. 1999. Red data book of European butterflies (Rhopalocera). Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg (Nature and Environment Series No. 99).
-
van Swaay, C., Warren, M. 2003. Prime butterfly areas in Europe: priority sites for conservation. Ministry of Agriculture, Nature Management and Fisheries. The Netherlands, 695 pp.
-
Wahlberg, N., Moilanen, A., Hanski, I. 1996. Predicting the occurrence of endangered species in fragmented landscapes. Science 273: 1536-1539.
-
Weibull, A. C., Bengtsson, J., Nohlgren, E. 2000. Diversity of butterflies in the agricultural landscape: the role of farming system and landscape heterogeneity. Ecography 23: 743-750.
-
Weiss, S. B., Murphy, D. D., White, R. R. 1988. Sun, slope and butterflies: topographic determinants of habitat quality for Euphydryas editha.Ecology 69: 1486-1496.
-
Wilcox, B. A., Murphy, D. D., Ehrlich, P. R., Austin, G. T. 1986. Insular biography of the montane butterfly faunas in the Great Basin: comparison with birds and mammals. Oecologia 69: 188-194.
-
Luoto, M., Virkkala, R., Heikkinen, R. K. 2007. The role of land cover in bioclimatic models depends on spatial resolution. Global Ecology and Biogeography 16: 34-42.
-
Moilanen, A., Hanski, I. 1998. Metapopulation dynamics: effects of habitat quality and landscape structure. Ecology 79: 2503-2515.
-
New, T. R. 1991. Butterfly conservation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
-
New, T. R. 1993. Conservation biology of Lycaenidae (butterflies). IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
-
New, T. R., Pyle, R. M., Thomas, J. A., Thomas, C. D., Hammond, P. C. 1995. Butterfly conservation management. Annual Review of Entomology 40: 57-83.
-
Nowicki, P., Settele, J., Henry, P.-Y., Woyciechowski, M. 2008. Butterfly monitoring methods: the ideal and the real world. Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution 54: 69-88, this issue.
-
Oostermeijer, J. G. B., Van-Swaay, C. A. M. 1998. The relationship between butterflies and environmental indicator values: A tool for conservation in a changing landscape. Biological Conservation 86: 271-280.
-
Ovaskainen, O., Cornell, S. J. 2003. Biased movement at a boundary and conditional occupancy times for diffusion processes. Journal of Applied Probability 40: 557-580.
-
Parmesan, C. 2006. Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 37: 637-669.
-
Parmesan, C., Ryrholm, N., Steganescu, C., Hill, J. K., Thomas, C. D., Descimon, H., Huntley, B., Kaila, L., Kullberg, J., Tammaru, T., Tennent, W. J., Thomas, J. A., Warren, W. 1999. Poleward shifts in geographical ranges of butterfly species associated with regional warming. Nature 399: 579-583.
-
Pearson, R. G., Dawson, T. P. 2003. Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? Global Ecology and Biogeography 12: 361-371.
-
Pe'er, G., Benyamini, D. 2008. A template for publishing the ‘conservation chain’ from problem identification to practical action, exemplified through the campaign for butterfly protection in Israel. Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution 54: 19-39, this issue.
-
Pe'er, G., Settele, J. 2008. The rare butterfly Tomares nesimachus (Lycaenidae) as a bioindicator for pollination services and ecosystem functioning in northern Israel. Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution 54: 111-136, this issue.
-
Pe'er, G., Saltz, D., Thulke, H.-H., Motro, U. 2004. Response to topography in a hilltopping butterfly and implications for modelling nonrandom dispersal. Animal Behaviour 68: 825-839.
-
Pe'er, G., Saltz, D., Frank, K. 2005. Virtual corridors for conservation management. Conservation Biology 19: 1997-2003.
-
Pe'er, G., Heinz, S. K., Frank, K. 2006. Connectivity in heterogeneous landscapes: analyzing the effect of topography. Landscape Ecology 21: 47-61.
-
Pimentel, D., Wilson, C., McCullum, C., Huang, R., Dwen, P., Flack, J., Tran, Q., Saltman, T., Cliff, B. 1997. Economic and environmental benefits of biodiversity. BioScience 47: 747-757.
-
Ricketts, T. H. 2001. The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes. American Naturalist 158: 87-99.
-
Roland, J., Keyghobadi, N., Fownes, S. 2000. Alpine Parnassius butterfly dispersal: effects of landscape and population size. Ecology 81: 1642-1653.
-
Schtickzelle, N., Baguette, M. 2003. Behavioural responses to habitat patch boundaries restrict dispersal and generate emigration-patch area relationships in fragmented landscapes. Journal of Animal Ecology 72: 533-545.
-
Schultz, C. B., Crone, E. E. 2001. Edge-mediated dispersal behavior in a prairie butterfly. Ecology 82: 1879-1892.
-
Schultz, C. B., Crone, E. E. 2008. Using ecological theory to advance butterfly conservation. Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution 54: 63-68, this issue.
-
Schultz, C. B., Russell, C., Wynn, L. 2008. Restoration, reintroduction and captive propagation for at-risk butterflies: a review of British and American conservation efforts. Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution 54: 41-61, this issue.
-
Schwartz-Tzachor, R., Izhaki, I., Perevolotsky, A. 2008. The role of seasonality and climatic factors in shaping the community composition of Mediterranean butterflies. Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution 54: 105-110, this issue.
-
Schweiger, O., Settele, J., Kudrna, O., Klotz, S., K�hn, I. 2008. Climate change can cause spatial mismatch of tophically interacting species. Ecology, in press.
-
Settele, J., Hammen, V., Hulme, P., Karlson, U., Klotz, S., Kotarac, M., Kunin, W., Marion, G., O'Connor, M., Petanidou, T., Peterson, K., Potts, S., Pritchard, H., Pysek, P., Rounsevell, M., Spangenberg, J., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Sykes, M., Vighi, M., Zobel, M., K�hn, I. 2005. ALARM—Assessing LArge-scale environmental Risks for biodiversity with tested Methods. GAIA—Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 14: 69-72.
-
Singer, M. C. 1972. Complex components of habitat suitability within a butterfly colony. Science 176: 75-77.
-
Singer, M. C., Thomas, C. D. 1996. Evolutionary responses of a butterfly metapopulation to human and climate-caused environmental variation. American Naturalist 148: S9-39.
-
Sizling, A. L., Storch, D. 2004. Power-law species-area relationships and self-similar species distributions within finite areas. Ecology Letters 7: 60-68.
-
Skorka, P., Settele, J., Woyciechowski, M. 2007. Effects of management cessation on grassland butterflies in southern Poland. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 121: 319-324.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 761 | 182 | 25 |
| Full Text Views | 52 | 5 | 2 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 69 | 9 | 0 |
Butterflies in and for conservation: Trends and Prospects
In: Israel Journal of Ecology and EvolutionSearch for other papers by GUY PE’ER in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by JOSEF SETTELE in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Butterflies serve as a focal group in conservation worldwide, not only in terms of the efforts toward their protection, but also in terms of their wide use as bioindicators for identifying ecological trends and for advancing conservation theory. Further, significant involvement of scientists in applied-conservation is aided by the public's interest in butterflies. In this introductory paper to the compendium we delineate several areas where the vast knowledge on butterflies, or their charisma, can be used to advance conservation. These include: (a) integrating small-scale and large-scale approaches; (b) expanding the extent of scientific networks and standardizing conservation approaches; (c) integrating butterflies into global change scenarios; (d) extending the use of models; and (e) strengthening the link between science and applied conservation. A main aim of this compendium it to advance the latter.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 761 | 182 | 25 |
| Full Text Views | 52 | 5 | 2 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 69 | 9 | 0 |
