Density-Dependent Habitat and Patch use in Gerbils: Consequences of Safety in Numbers?
In: Israel Journal of Ecology and EvolutionThe Interuniversity Institute for Marine Sciences at Eilat
Search for other papers by Victor China in
Current site
Google Scholar
Mitrani Department for Desert Ecology, Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University
Search for other papers by Burt P. Kotler in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Noa Shefer in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Joel S. Brown in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Zvika Abramsky in
Current site
Google Scholar
Habitat selection by individuals is often a density-dependent process: as density increases, the quality of the habitat decreases due to resource competition and interference. These same changes in habitat quality should likewise affect the foraging efforts of individuals at the patch scale. We used density manipulations, fenced enclosures in the field, to examine patch use in two species of gerbils, Gerbillus andersoni allenbyi and G. pyramidum. At the same time, we used sand tracking to measure activity densities and confirm that gerbils show density-dependent habitat selection across the stabilized and semistabilized sand habitats. We then quantified individual patch use, using giving-up densities (GUD; the amount of food left behind in a resource patch following exploitation) in artificial food patches. Gerbils used resource patches in a density-dependent manner, showing lower GUDs at higher activity densities. Interestingly, this was not the case in both habitats. In the stabilized sand habitat, GUDs for both gerbils were high, and decreased with increasing activity density, but in the semistabilized dune habitat, GUDs remained constantly low. This led GUDs in the two habitats to converge at high activity densities. For these surprising findings we suggest two mechanistically different explanations, one that relies on the ideal despotic distribution and the other, on safety in numbers. Evidence supports the second hypothesis, in which safety is pumped from the semistabilized to the stabilized habitat with increasing activity density.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Abramsky, Z. 1988. The role of habitat and productivity in structuring desert rodent communities. Oikos 52: 107-114.
-
Abramsky, Z., Pinshow, B. 1989. Changes in foraging effort in 2 gerbil species correlate with habitat type and intraspecific and interspecific activity. Oikos 56: 43-53.
-
Abramsky, Z., Brand, S., Rosenzweig, M.L. 1985a. Geographical ecology of Gerbilline rodents in the sand dune habitats of Israel. J. Biogeogr. 12: 363-372.
-
Abramsky, Z., Brand, S., Rosenzweig, M.L. 1985b. Habitat selection in Israeli desert rodents. Isr. J. Zool. 33: 111-111.
-
Abramsky, Z., Rosenzweig, M.L., Pinshow, B., Brown, J.S., Kotler, B., Mitchell, W.A. 1990. Habitat selection—an experimental field-test with 2 gerbil species. Ecology 71: 2358-2369.
-
Abramsky, Z., Rosenzweig, M.L., Pinshow, B. 1991. The shape of a gerbil isocline measured using principles of optimal habitat selection. Ecology 72: 329-340.
-
Abramsky, Z., Rosenzweig, M.L., Subach, A. 1992. The shape of a gerbil isocline—an experimental field-study. Oikos 63: 193-199.
-
Abramsky, Z., Ovadia, O., Rosenzweig, M.L. 1994. The shape of a Gerbillus pyramidum (Rodentia, Gerbillinae) isocline: an experimental fieldstudy. Oikos 69: 318-326.
-
Abramsky, Z., Strauss, E., Subach, A., Kotler, B.P., Riechman, A. 1996. The effect of barn owls (Tyto alba) on the activity and microhabitat selection of Gerbillus allenbyi and Gerbillus pyramidum.Oecologia 105: 313-319.
-
Abramsky, Z., Rosenzweig, M.L., Subach, A. 1997. Gerbils under threat of owl predation: isoclines and isodars. Oikos 78: 81-90.
-
Abramsky, Z., Rosenweig, M.L., Subach, A. 1998. Do gerbils care more about competition or predation? Oikos 83: 75-84.
-
Abramsky, Z., Rosenzweig, M.L., Subach, A. 2002. The costs of apprehensive foraging. Ecology 83: 1330-1340.
-
Abramsky, Z., Rosenzweig, M.L., Belmaker, J., Bar, A. 2004. The impact of long-term continuous risk of predation on two species of gerbils. Can. J. Zool. 82: 464-474.
-
Abramsky, Z., Rosenzweig, M.L., Elbaz, M., Ziv, Y. 2005. Does interspecific competition from congeners cause the scarcity of Gerbillus henleyi in productive sandy desert habitats? J. Anim. Ecol. 74: 567-578.
-
Bar, Y., Abramsky, Z., Gutterman, Y. 1984. Diet of gerbilline rodents in the Israeli desert. J. Arid Environ. 7: 371-376.
-
Ben-Natan, G., Abramsky, Z., Kotler, B.P., Brown, J.S. 2004. Seeds redistribution in sand dunes: a basis for coexistence of two rodent species. Oikos 105: 325-335.
-
Berec, M., Krivan, V., Berec, L. 2006. Asymmetric competition, body size, and foraging tactics: testing the ideal free distribution in two competing fish species. Evol. Ecol. Res. 8: 929-942.
-
Bertram, B.C.R. 1978. Living in groups: predators and prey. In: Davies, N.B., ed. Behavioral ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, pp. 64-96.
-
Brand, S., Abramsky, Z. 1987. Body masses of gerbilline rodents in sandy habitats of Israel. J. Arid Environ. 12: 247-253.
-
Brown, J.S. 1988. Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk, and competition. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 22: 37-47.
-
Brown, J.S., Arel, Y., Abramsky, Z., Kotler, B.P. 1992. Patch use by gerbils (Gerbillus-Allenbyi) in sandy and rocky habitats. J. Mammal. 73: 821-829.
-
Brown, J.S., Kotler, B.P., Mitchell, W.A. 1994a. Foraging theory, patch use, and the structure of a Negev desert granivore community. Ecology 75: 2286-2300.
-
Brown, J.S., Kotler, B.P., Valone, T.J. 1994b. Foraging under predation - a comparison of energetic and predation costs in rodent communities of the Negev and Sonoran deserts. Aust. J. Zool. 42: 435-448.
-
Charnov, E.L. 1976. Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. Theor. Popul. Biol. 9: 129-136.
-
Danin, A., Yaalon, D.H. 1978. Plant species-diversity and plant succession in a sandy area in northern Negev. Flora 167: 409-422.
-
Davidson, D.L., Morris, D.W. 2001. Density-dependent foraging effort of Deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus). Funct. Ecol. 15: 575-583.
-
Fairbanks, B., Dobson, F.S. 2007. Mechanisms of the group-size effect on vigilance in Columbian ground squirrels: dilution versus detection. Anim. Behav. 73: 115-123.
-
Fretwell, S.D. 1972. Populations in seasonal environments. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
-
Fretwell, S.D., Lucas, H.D. 1969. On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. 1. Theoretical development. Acta Biotheor. 19: 16-36.
-
Goodfriend, W., Ward, D., Subach, A. 1991. Standard operative temperatures of 2 desert rodents, Gerbillus Allenbyi and Gerbillus Pyramidum—the effects of morphology, microhabitat and environmental-factors. J. Theor. Biol. 16: 157-166.
-
Kotler, B.P. 1985. Microhabitat utilization in desert rodents—a comparison between two methods of measurement. J. Mammal. 66: 374-378.
-
Kotler, B.P., Brown, J.S. 1988. Environmental heterogeneity and the coexistence of desert rodents. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. S. 19: 281-307.
-
Kotler, B.P., Brown, J.S. 1990. Rates of seed harvest by 2 species of gerbilline rodents. J. Mammal. 71: 591-596.
-
Kotler, B.P., Brown, J.S., Dall, S.R.X., Gresser, S., Ganey, D., Bouskila, A. 2002. Foraging games between gerbils and their predators: temporal dynamics of resource depletion and apprehension in gerbils. Evol. Ecol. Res. 4: 495-518.
-
Kotler, B.P., Brown, J.S., Bouskila, A. 2004a. Apprehension and time allocation in gerbils: the effects of predatory risk and energetic state. Ecology 85: 917-922.
-
Kotler, B.P., Brown, J.S., Bouskila, A., Mukherjee, S., Goldberg, T. 2004b. Foraging games between gerbils and their predators: seasonal changes in schedules of activity and apprehension. Isr. J. Zool. 50: 255-271.
-
Kotler, B.P., Dickman, C.R., Wasserberg, G., Ovadia, O. 2005. The use of time and space by male and female gerbils exploiting a pulsed resource. Oikos 109: 594-602.
-
Li, L., Wang, G. 2006. The ideal free distribution of clonal plant's ramets among patches in a heterogeneous environment. Bull. Math Biol. 68: 1837-1850.
-
Lima, S.L., Dill, L.M. 1990. Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation—a review and prospectus. Can. J. Zool. 68: 619-640.
-
Maguire, G., Ramp, D., Coulson, G. 2006. Foraging behaviour and dispersion of eastern grey kangaroos (Macropus giganteus) in an ideal free framework. J. Zool. 268: 261-269.
-
May, R.M. 1976. Simple mathematical-models with very complicated dynamics. Nature 261: 459-467.
-
Mitchell, W.A., Abramsky, Z., Kotler, B.P., Pinshow, B., Brown, J.S. 1990. The effect of competition on foraging activity in desert rodents—theory and experiments. Ecology 71: 844-854.
-
Morris, D.W. 1988. Habitat-dependent population regulation and community structure. Evol. Ecol. 2: 253-269.
-
Morris, D.W. 1994. Habitat matching: alternatives and implications to populations and communities. Evol. Ecol. 8: 387-406.
-
Morris, D.W. 1997. Optimally foraging deer mice in prairie mosaics: a test of habitat theory and absence of landscape effects. Oikos 80: 31-42.
-
Morris, D.W. 2001. Learning from the games animals play: using behavior to assess spatial structure and stochasticity in natural populations. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 38: 37-53.
-
Morris, D.W., Mukherjee, S. 2007. Can we measure carrying capacity with foraging behavior? Ecology 88: 597-604.
-
Olsson, O., Molokwu, M.N. 2007. On the missed opportunity cost, GUD, and estimating environmental quality. Isr. J. Zool. 53(3-4): 263-278.
-
Ovadia, O., Abramsky, Z. 1995. Density-dependent habitat selection—evaluation of the isodar method. Oikos 73: 86-94.
-
Ovadia, O., Dohna, H.Z. 2003. The effect of intra- and interspecific aggression on patch residence time in Negev desert gerbils: a competing risk analysis. Behav. Ecol. 14: 583-591.
-
Pulliam, H.R., Danielson, B.J. 1991. Sources, sinks, and habitat selection—a landscape perspective on population-dynamics. Am. Nat. 137: S50-S66.
-
Pusenius, J., Schmidt, K.A. 2002. The effects of habitat manipulation on population distribution and foraging behavior in meadow voles. Oikos 98: 251-262.
-
Rosenzweig, M.L. 1981. A theory of habitat selection. Ecology 62: 327-335.
-
Rosenzweig, M.L., Abramsky, Z. 1986. Centrifugal Community Organization. Oikos 46: 339-348.
-
Rosenzweig, M.L., Abramsky, Z., Subach, A. 1997. Safety in numbers: sophisticated vigilance by Allenby's gerbil. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 5713-5715.
-
Stephens, D.W., Krebs, J.R. 1986. Foraging theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
-
Wasserberg, G., Kotler, B.P., Abramsky, Z. 2006. The role of site, habitat, seasonality and competition in determining the nightly activity patterns of psammophilic gerbils in a centrifugally organized community. Oikos 112: 573-579.
-
Wasserberg, G., Kotler, B.P., Morris, D.W., Abramsky, Z. 2007. A field test of the centrifugal community organization model using psammophilic gerbils in Israel's southern coastal plain. Evol. Ecol. Res. 9: 299-311.
-
Zahavi, A., Wahrman, J. 1957. The cytotaxonomy, ecology and evolution of the gerbils and jirds of Israel (Rodentia: Gerbillinae). Mammalia 21: 341-380.
-
Ziv, Y., Abramsky, Z., Kotler, B.P., Subach, A. 1993. Interference competition and temporal and habitat partitioning in 2 gerbil species. Oikos 66: 237-246.
-
Ziv, Y., Kotler, B.P., Abramsky, Z., Rosenzweig, M.L. 1995. Foraging efficiencies of competing rodents—why do gerbils exhibit shared-preference habitat selection. Oikos 73: 260-268.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 341 | 58 | 3 |
| Full Text Views | 24 | 3 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 28 | 1 | 0 |
Density-Dependent Habitat and Patch use in Gerbils: Consequences of Safety in Numbers?
In: Israel Journal of Ecology and EvolutionThe Interuniversity Institute for Marine Sciences at Eilat
Search for other papers by Victor China in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Mitrani Department for Desert Ecology, Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University
Search for other papers by Burt P. Kotler in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Noa Shefer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Joel S. Brown in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Zvika Abramsky in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Habitat selection by individuals is often a density-dependent process: as density increases, the quality of the habitat decreases due to resource competition and interference. These same changes in habitat quality should likewise affect the foraging efforts of individuals at the patch scale. We used density manipulations, fenced enclosures in the field, to examine patch use in two species of gerbils, Gerbillus andersoni allenbyi and G. pyramidum. At the same time, we used sand tracking to measure activity densities and confirm that gerbils show density-dependent habitat selection across the stabilized and semistabilized sand habitats. We then quantified individual patch use, using giving-up densities (GUD; the amount of food left behind in a resource patch following exploitation) in artificial food patches. Gerbils used resource patches in a density-dependent manner, showing lower GUDs at higher activity densities. Interestingly, this was not the case in both habitats. In the stabilized sand habitat, GUDs for both gerbils were high, and decreased with increasing activity density, but in the semistabilized dune habitat, GUDs remained constantly low. This led GUDs in the two habitats to converge at high activity densities. For these surprising findings we suggest two mechanistically different explanations, one that relies on the ideal despotic distribution and the other, on safety in numbers. Evidence supports the second hypothesis, in which safety is pumped from the semistabilized to the stabilized habitat with increasing activity density.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 341 | 58 | 3 |
| Full Text Views | 24 | 3 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 28 | 1 | 0 |
