Motor and sensory preferences were measured for 8 common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Three types of motor function were examined: spontaneous feeding, mouth use when chewing and visuospatial reaching. Eye preference was used as an index of sensory lateralization. The marmosets displayed individual preferences for the performance of the motor tasks, but no group biases were revealed. Correlations between preferences displayed on the motor tests suggest that one hemisphere may control spontaneous feeding and lateralized mouth use while the other controls visuospatial reaching, but no consistent preference was present. In an eye preference test, 7 subjects displayed right-eye preferences, suggesting hemispheric specialisation for this function.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 5 | 5 | 1 |
Full Text Views | 0 | 0 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Motor and sensory preferences were measured for 8 common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Three types of motor function were examined: spontaneous feeding, mouth use when chewing and visuospatial reaching. Eye preference was used as an index of sensory lateralization. The marmosets displayed individual preferences for the performance of the motor tasks, but no group biases were revealed. Correlations between preferences displayed on the motor tests suggest that one hemisphere may control spontaneous feeding and lateralized mouth use while the other controls visuospatial reaching, but no consistent preference was present. In an eye preference test, 7 subjects displayed right-eye preferences, suggesting hemispheric specialisation for this function.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 5 | 5 | 1 |
Full Text Views | 0 | 0 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 0 | 0 | 0 |