Recognition of Indigenous Land Rights in Norway and Canada

In: International Journal on Minority and Group Rights
View More View Less
  • 1 UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway and University of Lapland, Rovaniemi, Finland,
  • | 2 The University of Calgary, Canada; UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway,
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution


Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):


Many states offer constitutional protection to the traditional lands of indigenous peoples. International treaties protecting ethnic minorities and indigenous peoples also require protection of the rights of indigenous communities with respect to traditional territories. States have followed different routes in identifying the ownership and resource rights of indigenous communities. In Norway, the Courts have traditionally applied the rules on prescription and immemorial usage, developed through centuries in the farming societies of Scandinavia. The legislature has chosen to follow the same approach in the Finnmark area of Norway under the terms of the Finnmark Act (2005). By contrast, in Canada, a settled colony with an English common law tradition, the Courts have developed a sui generis approach to the recognition of Aboriginal title. This article examines the rules for identifying and legally recognising the traditional lands of indigenous people in Norway and Canada with a view to reflecting on similarities and differences.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 278 223 2
Full Text Views 59 41 5
PDF Views & Downloads 93 79 6