“Law and Economics” Literature and Ottoman Legal Studies


in Islamic Law and Society
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.

Help

 

Have Institutional Access?

Login with your institution. Any other coaching guidance?

Connect

This article considers the relevance of hypotheses developed in the “law and economics” literature regarding settlement-trial decisions in the Ottoman Empire. In particular, it explores the applicability of the “selection principle” and “50 percent plaintiff win-rate” formulated by George Priest and Benjamin Klein. The article also demonstrates how existing research based on Ottoman court records can contribute to the “law and economics” scholarship, which is dominated by research based on modern, Western contexts. The article utilizes the court records from eighteenth-century Kastamonu to make observations about settlement/litigation decisions in an Ottoman context. 


Sections
References
  • 1

    Haim GerberState Society and Law in Islam: Ottoman Law in Comparative Perspective (Albany: State University of New York Press1994) 55-6. Debbağzade’s compila­tion includes several hundred court registries presented to instruct readers in the legal and scribal standards that courts were expected to observe in producing documentation.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Haim GerberState Society and Law in Islam: Ottoman Law in Comparative Perspective (Albany: State University of New York Press1994) 56. “Only in the category of commoners against religious doctors” Gerber observes “do we find a tie of ten cases each”; ibid.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Haim GerberState Society and Law in Islam: Ottoman Law in Comparative Perspective (Albany: State University of New York Press1994) 56-7.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    George L. Priest and Benjamin Klein“The Selection of Disputes for Litigation,” The Journal of Legal Studies 13 (1984): 1-55.

  • 10

    Priest and Klein“The Selection of Disputes” 13.

  • 12

    Priest and Klein“The Selection of Disputes” 26.

  • 13

    Priest and Klein“The Selection of Disputes” 19.

  • 14

    Lucien A. Bebchuk“Litigation and Settlement under Imperfect Information,” Rand Journal of Economics 15 (1984): 404-15.

  • 15

    Priest and Klein“The Selection of Disputes” 29.

  • 16

    See for example Joel Waldfogel“The Selection Hypothesis and the Relationship between Trial and Plaintiff Victory,” Journal of Political Economy 103 (1995): 229-60 and idem “Reconciling Asymmetric Information and Divergent Expectations Theories of Litigation” NBER Working Paper No. 6409 (1998). http://www.nber.org/papers/w6409.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    For example Donald Wittman“Is the Selection of Cases for Trial Biased?” Journal of Legal Studies 14 (1987): 185-214; Theodore Eisenberg “Testing the Selection Effect: A New Theoretical Framework with Empirical Tests” The Journal of Legal Studies 19 (1990): 337-58; Samuel R. Gross and Kent D. Syverud “Getting to No: A Study of Settlement Negotiations and the Selection of Cases for Trial” Michigan Law Review 90 (1991): 319-93; and Steven Shavell “Any Frequency of Plaintiff Victory at Trial Is Possible” The Journal of Legal Studies 25 (1996): 493-501.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Peter Siegelman and John J. Donohue“The Selection of Employment Discrimination Disputes for Litigation: Using Business Cycle Effects to Test the Priest-Klein Hypothesis,” The Journal of Legal Studies 24 (1995): 427-62; and Daniel Kessler Thomas Meites and Geoffrey Miller “Explaining Deviations from the Fifty-Percent Rule: A Multimodal Approach to the Selection of Cases for Litigation The Journal of Legal Studies 25 (1996): 233-59.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Robert D. Cooter and Daniel L. Rubinfeld“Economic Analysis of Legal Disputes and Their Resolution,” Journal of Economic Literature 27 (1989): 1067-97; and Kessler et al. “Explaining Deviations” 246-7.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Kessler et al.“Explaining Deviations”; Waldfogel, “The Selection Hypothesis”; and Peter Siegelman and Joel Waldfogel, “Toward a Taxonomy of Disputes: New Evidence through the Prism of the Priest/Klein Model,” The Journal of Legal Studies 28 (1999): 101-30.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    See for example Nelly Hanna“Administration of Courts in Ottoman Cairo,” in The State and Its Servantsed. Nelly Hanna (Cairo: American University Press1995) 44-59; Jennings “Kadı Court and Legal Procedure”; idem “Limitations”; and Abraham Marcus The Middle East on the Eve of Modernity: Aleppo in the Eighteenth Century (New York: Columbia University Press 1989). For two recent exceptions see Coşgel and Ergene “Dispute Resolution” and Timur Kuran and Scott Lustig “Judicial Biases in Ottoman Istanbul: Islamic Justice and Its Compatibility with Modern Economic Life” Journal of Law and Economics 55 (2012 forthcoming). We are grateful to Kuran and Lustig for sharing their article with us prior to publication.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    See for example Edward P. ThompsonWhigs and Hunters: The Origin of Black Act (New York: Pantheon1976).

  • 28

    Jennings“Limitations”; and Ginio “Criminal Justice” 200-204.

  • 30

    Joseph R. Hacker“Jewish Autonomy in the Ottoman Empire: Its Scope and Limits. Jewish Courts from the Sixteenth to the Eighteenth Centuries,” in The Jews of the Ottoman Empireed. Avigdor Levy (Princeton: Princeton University Press1994) 153-203; Timur Kuran “The Economic Ascent of the Middle East’s Religious Minorities: The Role of Islamic Legal Pluralism” Journal of Legal Studies 33 (2004): 475-515; and Ginio “Criminal Justice” 188.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31

    s also received salaries; see ZarinebafCrime and Punishment144.

  • 35

    MarcusAleppo106.

  • 38

    Mark Ramseyer and Minoru Nakazato“The Rational Litigant: Settlement Amounts and Verdict Rates in Japan,” The Journal of Legal Studies 18 (1989) 264.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39

    Max WeberEconomy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology (Berkeley: University of California Press1978) 891-2 897 976 and passim.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40

    Lawrence RosenBargaining for Reality: The Construction of Social Relations in a Muslim Community (Chicago: University of Chicago Press1984); idem Anthropology of Justice: Law as Culture in Islamic Society (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1989).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42

    See for example David S. PowersLaw Society and Culture in the Maghrib 1300-1500 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2002).

  • 43

    RosenAnthropology of Justice43. Doctrinal works consider it appropriate for the qadi to push the litigants toward negotiated settlements before allowing litigation. To understand how classical legal studies treat amicable settlements see Aida Othman “‘And Ṣulḥ is Best’: Amicable Settlement and Dispute Resolution in Islamic Law” (Ph.D. diss. Harvard University 2005); and idem “‘And Amicable Settlement is Best’: Ṣulḥ and Dispute Resolution in Islamic Law” Arab Law Quarterly 21 (2007): 64-90. Anthropological research reveals a similar tendency in modern Islamic courts; see among others Richard Antoun “The Islamic Court The Islamic Judge and the Accommodation of Traditions: A Jordanian Case Study” International Journal of Middle East Studies 12 (1980): 455-67; idem “Litigant Strategies in an Islamic Court in Jordan” in Law and Islam in the Middle East ed. Daisy H. Dwyer (New York: Bergen and Garvey Publishers); Aharon Layish Women and Islamic Law in a Non-Muslim State (New Jersey: Transaction Books 1975); idem Divorce in the Libyan Family (New York: New York University Press 1991); Enid Hill Mahkama! Studies in the Egyptian Legal System: Courts & Crimes Law & Society (London: Ithaca 1979); Erin Stiles “Broken Edda and Marital Mistakes: Two Recent Disputes from an Islamic Court in Zanzibar” in Dispensing Justice in Islam: Qadis and Their Judgments eds.M. Masud R. Peters and D. Powers (Leiden and Boston: Brill 2006) 95-116; John R. Bowen Islam Law and Equality in Indonesia: An Anthropology of Public Reasoning (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2003); Lynn Welchman Beyond the Code: Muslim Family Law and the Shari‘a Judiciary in the Palestinian West Bank (The Hague London and Boston: Kluwer Law International 1990); Michael Peletz Islamic Modern: Religious Courts and Cultural Politics in Malaysia (Princeton: Princeton University Press 2000); and Ido Shahar “Practicing Islamic Law in a Legal Pluralistic Environment: The Changing Face of a Muslim Court in Present-Day Jerusalem” (Ph.D. diss. Ben-Gurion University of the Negev 2006).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 47

    Ramseyer and Nakazato“The Rational Litigant” 268-70.

  • 48

    MarcusAleppo111.

  • 52

    Cf. Uriel HeydStudies in Ottoman Criminal Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press1973) 250; and Ginio “Criminal Justice” 207.

  • 53

    Judith E. TuckerIn the House of the Law: Gender and Islamic Law in Ottoman Syria and Palestine (Berkeley: University of California Press1998) 68-9.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 54

    Iris Agmon“Women, Class, and Gender: Muslim Jaffa and Haifa at the Turn of the 20th Century,” International Journal of Middle East Studies 30 (1998): 477-500.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 63

    HeydStudies252-3; Peters Crime and Punishment 34 77 82 84 and 98.

  • 64

    Daniel Klerman“Jurisdictional Competition and the Evolution of the Common Law,” University of Chicago Law Review 74 (2007): 1179-226.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 66

    Kuran and Lustig“Judicial Biases”10.

  • 72

    Kuran and Lustig“Judicial Biases” 16.

Index Card
Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 99 95 5
Full Text Views 190 190 2
PDF Downloads 20 20 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0