The notion that national leaders use foreign policy actions for domestic political benefit is widely accepted in the foreign policy literature, but has only been studied with regard to foreign policy involving the use of force. Literature on third-party mediation has emerged separately and has not taken mediators’ domestic political motivations and constraints into account when explaining mediation occurrence and outcomes. Diplomatic efforts such as mediation should be appealing to leaders seeking to impress their domestic audience because it provides them with a low risk opportunity to appear competent to their domestic audience. While mediation is a regular occurrence in US foreign policy, its public visibility varies greatly. However, models of presidential media coverage suggest that media outlets are likely to pay a disproportionate amount of attention to presidents and their high level surrogates while engaging in diplomacy overseas. The article proposes that the higher the profile of the official an administration sends to mediate a crisis overseas, the greater the increase in the president’s approval rating. Additionally, the public’s attentiveness to foreign policy should condition the effect of a high profile mediator on presidential approval. As foreign policy becomes more salient to the public, the effect of a higher profile mediator on presidential approval should be greater. Empirical results support the argument.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Althedie David L. & Snow Robert P. Media Worlds in the Postjournalism Era 1991 New York De Gruyter
Anderson Pelle, Baumgartner Justin, Grieg J. Michael & Diehl Paul “Turning Down the Heat: Influences on Conflict Management in Enduring Rivalries.” International Interactions 2001 27 239 274
Andrade Lydia & Young Gary “Presidential Agenda Setting: Influences on the Emphasis of Foreign Policy.” Political Research Quarterly 1996 49 3 591 605
Bamgartner Frank & Jones Bryan D. Agenda and Instability in American Politics 1993 Chicago, IL University of Chicago Press
Bennett Lance W. “Toward a Theory of Press-State Relations in the United States.” Journal of Communication 1990 40 2 103 125
Bennett Lance W., Lawrence Regina G. & Livingston Steven When the Press Fails 2007 Chicago, IL University of Chicago Press
Bercovitch Jacob “International Conflict Management Database.” 1999 Christchurch, New Zealand Data and Coding Manual
Bercovitch Jacob Bercovitch Jacob “Introduction: Putting Mediation in Context,” Studies in International Mediation 2002 New York Palgrave Macmillan
Bercovitch Jacob & Fretter Judith “Studying International Mediation: Developing Data Sets on Mediation, Looking for Patterns, and Searching for Answers.” International Negotiation 2007 12 2 145 173
Bercovitch Jacob & Schneider Gerald “Who Mediates? The Political Economy of International Conflict Management.” Journal of Peace Research 2000 37 2 145 165
Bobrow Davis B. Rubin Jeffrey Z. “The Perspective of Great Power Foreign Policy: Steps in Context,” Dynamics of Third Party Intervention 1981 New York Praeger
Brace Paul & Hinckley Barbara Follow the Leader: Opinion Polls and the Modern Presidents 1992 New York, NY Basic Books
Brambor Thomas, Clark William Roberts & Golder Matt “Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses.” Political Analysis 2006 13 1 20
Brody Richard Assessing the President: The Media, Elite Opinion, and Public Support 1991 Stanford, CA Stanford University Press
Brulé David J. “Congressional Opposition, the Economy, and US Dispute Initiation, 1946–2000.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 2006 50 463 483
Bueno de Mesquita B. & Siverson R.M. “War and the Survival of Political Leaders: A Comparative Study of Regime Types and Political Accountability.” American Political Science Review 1995 89 841 855
Bueno de Mesquita B., Smith A., Siverson R.M. & Morrow J.D. The Logic of Political Survival 2003 Cambridge, MA MIT Press
Burbach David T. “Peace-Promoting Actions and Presidential Approval: Rally ‘Round the Dove?” 2004 Chicago, IL Prepared for the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, September 2, 2004
Clark David H. & Reed William “The Strategic Sources of Foreign Policy Substitution.” American Journal of Political Science 2005 49 3 609 624
Cohen Jeffrey E. “Presidential Rhetoric and the Public Agenda.” American Journal of Political Science 1995 39 1 87 107
Edwards George C. III, Mitchell William & Welch Reed “Explaining Presidential Approval: The Importance of Issue Salience.” American Journal of Political Science 1995 39 108 134
Fleisher Richard & Bond Jon R. Bond Jon R. & Fleisher Richard “Partisanship and the President’s Quest for Votes on the Floor of Congress,” Polarized Politics: Congress and the President in a Partisan Era 2000 Washington, DC CQ Press
Foster Dennis M. & Palmer Glenn “Presidents, Public Opinion, and Diversionary Behavior: The Role of Partisan Support Reconsidered.” Foreign Policy Analysis 2006 2 269 287
Greig J. Michael “Stepping into the Fray: When Do Mediators Mediate?” American Journal of Political Science 2005 49 249 266
Greig J. Michael & Regan Patrick M. “When Do They Say Yes? An Analysis of the Willingness to Offer and Accept Mediation in Civil Wars.” International Studies Quarterly 2008 52 759 781
Hinckley Barbara Less than Meets the Eye: Foreign Policy Making and the Myth of an Assertive Congress 1994 Chicago, IL University of Chicago Press
Howell W. “Unilateral Powers: A Brief Overview.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 2005 35 3 London Longman 417 439 Reprinted from James Pfiffner and Roger Davidson, editors, Understanding the Presidency
Howell Willam & Pevehouse Jon “Presidents, Congress, and the Use of Force.” International Organization 2005 59 209 232
Hughes Emmet John The Ordeal of Power: A Political Memoir of the Eisenhower Years 1962 New York H. Wolff
James Patrick & Oneal John “The Influence of Domestic and International Politics on the President’s Use of Force.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 1991 35 307 332
Jentleson Bruce W. “The Pretty Prudent Public: Post Post-Vietnam American Opinion on the Use of Military.” International Studies Quarterly 1992 36 49 74
Jentleson Bruce W. & Britton Rebecca L. “Still Pretty Prudent: Post-Cold War American Public Opinion on the Use of Military Force.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 1998 42 4 395 417
Johnson Loch & McCormick James “Foreign Policy by Executive Fiat.” Foreign Policy 1977 28 117 138
Keele Luke & Kelly Nathan J. “Dynamic Models for Dynamic Theories: The Ins and Outs of Lagged Dependent Variables.” Political Analysis 2006 14 2 186 205
Kleiboer Mareike Bercovitch Jacob “Great Power Mediation: Using Leverage to Make Peace,” Studies in International Mediation 2002 New York Palgrave Macmillan.
Levy Jack S. Midlarsky Manus I. “The Diversionary Theory of War: A Critique,” Handbook of War Studies 1989 London Unwin-Hyman
Lian Bradley & Oneal John “Presidents, the Use of Force, and Public Opinion.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 1993 37 277 300
Maoz Zeev & Terris Lesley G. “Credibility and Strategy in International Mediation.” International Interactions 2006 32 4 409 440
Marshall Bryan & Prins Brandon C. “Power or Posturing? Congressional Influence on U.S. Presidential Decisions to Use Force.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 2011 Forthcoming in special edition
Mayer Kenneth With the Stroke of a Pen: Executive Orders and Presidential Power 2001 Princeton, NJ Princeton University Press
Morgan T. Clifton & Bickers Kenneth N. “Domestic Discontent and the External Use of Force.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 1992 36 1 25 52
Morgan T. Clifton & Palmer Glenn “A Model of Foreign Policy Substitutability: Selecting the Right Tools for the Job(s).” Journal of Conflict Resolution 2000 44 1 11 32
Most Benjamin A. & Starr Harvey “International Relations Theory, Foreign Policy Substitutability, and ‘Nice’ Laws.” World Politics 1984 36 3 383 406
Neustadt Richard E. Presidential Power: The Politics of Leadership 1960 New York Wiley
Ostrom Charles & Job Brian “The President and the Political Use of Force.” American Political Science Review 1986 80 541 566
Page Robert I. & Shapiro Benjamin Y. The Rational Public: Fifty years of Trends in Americans’ Policy Preferences 1992 Chicago, IL University of Chicago Press
Palmer Glenn & Morgan T. Clifton A Theory of Foreign Policy 2007 Princeton, NJ Princeton University Press
Princen Thomas Intermediaries in International Conflict 1995 Princeton, NJ Princeton University Press
Pruitt Dean G. Rubin Jeffrey Z. “Kissinger as a Traditional Mediator with Power,” Dynamics of Third Party Intervention 1981 New York Praeger
Richards Diana, T., Morgan Clifton, Wilson Rick K., Schwebach Valerie & Young Garry D. “Good Times, Bad Times and the Diversionary Use of Force: A Tale of Some Not So Free Agents.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 1993 37 504 535
Russett Bruce Gochman C. & Sabrosky A. “Economic Decline, Electoral Pressure, and the Initiation of International Conflict,” Prisoners of War? 1990 Lexington, KY Lexington Books
Schultz Kenneth “Domestic Opposition and Signaling in International Crises.” American Political Science Review 1998 92 829 844
Schultz Kenneth Democracy and Coercive Diplomacy 2001 Cambridge Cambridge University Press
Simmel Georg Conflict and the Web of Group-affiliations 1955 Glencoe, IL Free Press
Sirin Cigdem & Villalobos José D. “Agenda Setting from the Oval Office: An Experimental Examination of Presidential Influence over the Public Agenda.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 2012 24 1 21 41
Stoll Richard “The Sound of the Guns: Is There a Congressional Rally Effect after US Military Action?” American Politics Quarterly 1987 15 223 237
Tarar Ahmer “Diversionary Incentives and the Bargaining Approach to War.” International Studies Quarterly 2006 50 1 169 188
Touval Saadia The Peace Brokers: Mediators in the Arab-Israeli Conflict, 1948–1979 1982 Princeton, NJ Princeton University Press
Touval Saadia Bercovitch Jacob & Rubin Jeffrey Z. “The Superpowers as Mediators,” Mediation in International Relations: Multiple approaches to Conflict Management 1992 New York St. Martin’s Press
Touval Saadia Mediation in the Yugoslav Wars: The Critical Years, 1990–1995 2002 New York Palgrave
Touval Saadia “Mediation and Foreign Policy.” International Studies Review 2003 5 4 91 95
Tsebelis George “Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism, and Multipartyism.” British Journal of Political Science 1995 25 289 326
Walter Barbara Committing to Peace: The Successful Settlement of Civil War 2002 Princeton, NJ Princeton University Press
Werner Suzanne & Yuen Amy “Making and Keeping Peace.” International Organization 2005 59 2 261 292
Wilkenfeld Jonathan Conflict Behavior and Linkage Politics 1973 New York David McKay
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 266 | 34 | 1 |
Full Text Views | 101 | 1 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 17 | 2 | 0 |
The notion that national leaders use foreign policy actions for domestic political benefit is widely accepted in the foreign policy literature, but has only been studied with regard to foreign policy involving the use of force. Literature on third-party mediation has emerged separately and has not taken mediators’ domestic political motivations and constraints into account when explaining mediation occurrence and outcomes. Diplomatic efforts such as mediation should be appealing to leaders seeking to impress their domestic audience because it provides them with a low risk opportunity to appear competent to their domestic audience. While mediation is a regular occurrence in US foreign policy, its public visibility varies greatly. However, models of presidential media coverage suggest that media outlets are likely to pay a disproportionate amount of attention to presidents and their high level surrogates while engaging in diplomacy overseas. The article proposes that the higher the profile of the official an administration sends to mediate a crisis overseas, the greater the increase in the president’s approval rating. Additionally, the public’s attentiveness to foreign policy should condition the effect of a high profile mediator on presidential approval. As foreign policy becomes more salient to the public, the effect of a higher profile mediator on presidential approval should be greater. Empirical results support the argument.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 266 | 34 | 1 |
Full Text Views | 101 | 1 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 17 | 2 | 0 |