Save

Process Peace: A New Evaluation Framework for Track ii Diplomacy

In: International Negotiation
Authors:
Nathaniel Allen Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies 28 18th St SE, Washington, dc 20003 USA nallen12@jhu.edu

Search for other papers by Nathaniel Allen in
https://brill.com/search?f_0=author&q_0=Nathaniel+Allen
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Travis Sharp Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs Robertson Hall 026, Princeton University, Princeton, nj 08544 USA travisks@princeton.edu

Search for other papers by Travis Sharp in
https://brill.com/search?f_0=author&q_0=Travis+Sharp
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$34.95

Track ii diplomacy, or unofficial interactions designed to produce ideas, build relationships, and change perceptions, has become a supplement – and sometimes an alternative – to traditional diplomacy. Yet practitioners and scholars still debate its effectiveness. Practitioners claim that Track ii diplomacy promotes peace but insist that its contributions are intangible and therefore difficult to assess empirically. Meanwhile, scholars maintain that only rigorous empirical evaluation can demonstrate the effect of Track ii diplomacy on conflict outcomes. This study seeks to break this impasse in two ways. First, it provides a comprehensive explanation of why Track ii practitioners object to evaluation, drawing on personal interviews conducted in eight countries. Second, it proposes a new evaluation framework, which we call the “Process Peace” approach, which better balances practitioner and scholarly equities. Our framework should appeal to readers interested in bridging the gap between the practice and theory of Track ii diplomacy.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 965 138 9
Full Text Views 366 29 3
PDF Views & Downloads 230 73 9