Best Practices in the Measurement and Evaluation of Track Two Dialogues: Towards a “Reflective Practice Model”

In: International Negotiation
View More View Less
  • 1 United States Institute of Peace, 2301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20037, USA
  • | 2 Ottawa Dialogue, The University of Ottawa, 120 rue Université, Rm. FSS-5024, Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 6N5, Canada
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution


Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):



Measuring the impact of Track Two dialogues has proven a difficult challenge for the field over many years. Each dialogue is different, which makes a standardized test difficult to achieve. Moreover, different actors wish to measure different things: “value” for money; impact on the conflict; how certain facilitation techniques work; and others. In this article, we present a model that can be used to measure the impact of a dialogue over time, while also encouraging reflective practice in the field. This “Reflective Practice Model” can be used to provide a snapshot of a particular moment – or as a vehicle for the accumulation of a series of such moments – thereby providing a means to observe and measure changes as the dialogue goes on.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 320 138 1
Full Text Views 43 16 2
PDF Views & Downloads 103 45 4