A note on Contextual Blindness as extended to only

in International Review of Pragmatics
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

This paper discusses the Contextual Blindness principle as extended to the exclusive operator only. It focuses on the interaction between only and alternatives derived from a special category of contextual orders, generally referred to as “rank orders”. It submits problematic evidence for the principle and argues that access to contextual information is required in the relevant cases. Its conclusion is that, as things stand, these cases constitute an obstacle to the semantic generalization of scalar reasoning involving only.

A note on Contextual Blindness as extended to only

in International Review of Pragmatics

Sections

References

  • Beaver David and Brady Clark. 2008. Sense and Sensitivity: How Focus Determines Meaning. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Bonomi Andrea and Paolo Casalegno. 1993. Only: Association with focus in event semantics. Natural Language Semantics 2:1–45.

  • Chierchia Gennaro. 2013. Logic in Grammar. Polarity Free Choice and Intervention. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Chierchia Gennaro Danny Fox and Benjamin Spector. 2012. Scalar implicature as a grammatical phenomenon. In C. Maienborn K. von Heusinger and P. Portner (eds.) Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning 2297–2331. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Fauconnier Gilles. 1975. Pragmatic scales and logical structures. Linguistic Inquiry 6: 353–375.

  • Fox Danny. 2007. Free choice and the theory of scalar implicatures. In U. Sauerland and P. Stateva (eds.) Presupposition and Implicature in Compositional Semantics 71–120. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Geurts Bart and Rick Nouwen. 2007. At least et al: The semantic of scalar modifiers. Language 83: 533–559.

  • Hirschberg Julia. 1985. A Theory of Scalar Implicature. PhD thesis University of Pennsylvania.

  • Horn Laurence. 1969. A presuppositional analysis of “only” and “even”. Chicago Linguistics Society 5: 98-107

  • Horn Laurence. 1989. A Natural History of Negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Horn Laurence. 2009. WJ40: Implicature truth and meaning. International Review of Pragmatics 1:3–34.

  • Magri Giorgio. 2009. A theory of individual-level predicates based on blind mandatory scalar implicatures. Natural Language Semantics 17:245–297.

  • Magri Giorgio. 2017. Blindness short-sightedness and Hirschberg’s contextuallyordered alternatives: A reply to Schlenker (2012). In S. Pistoia-Reda and F. Domaneschi (eds.) Linguistic and Psycholinguistic Approaches on Implicatures and Presuppositions 9–54. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Pistoia-Reda Salvatore. 2017. Contextual blindness in implicature computation. Natural Language Semantics 25: 109–124.

  • Rooth Mats. 1985. Association with Focus. PhD thesis University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

  • Rooth Mats. 2012. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1:75–116.

  • Schlenker Philippe. 2012. Maximize presupposition and Gricean reasoning. Natural Language Semantics 20: 391–429.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 25 25 19
Full Text Views 2 2 2
PDF Downloads 1 1 1
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0