Save

A Worry about Telos Theory

In: Journal of Applied Animal Ethics Research
Author:
Peter J. Markie Department of Philosophy, College of Arts and Science, University of Missouri Columbia, MO 65211 USA

Search for other papers by Peter J. Markie in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$34.95

Abstract

With his account of the rights stemming from the telos-based interests of nonhuman animals, Bernard Rollin in, A New Basis for Animal Ethics, advances our understanding of animal ethics in a way that both can and should guide our behavior. Nonetheless, telos theory needs to be developed to capture the existence of moral rights that are not based in particular aspects of an animal’s telos. I argue for the existence and importance of such rights, propose a way to capture them within telos theory, and consider their implication for the argument from marginal cases.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 93 93 14
Full Text Views 2 2 0
PDF Views & Downloads 4 4 1