Consumers’ perceptions of stakeholder credibility: who has it and who perceives it
In: Journal on Chain and Network ScienceSearch for other papers by D. Dentoni in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by G. Tonsor in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by R. Calantone in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by H.C. Peterson in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Based on the case of US consumer choice of beef steak brands, this study investigates how individual perceptions of information source credibility influence food brand choices. In particular, it tackles the questions: which stakeholders inside or outside the food chain are perceived as credible information sources in promoting food quality? Which consumer segments perceive different stakeholders as credible? What is the relationship between consumers’ perceptions of stakeholder credibility and their brand choices? Data are collected from a representative sample of 460 US citizens through an online survey in November 2009 and analyzed through a set of path models. Results provide evidence that: perceptions of stakeholder credibility overall influence their beef brand choices; consumer perceptions that a stakeholder is knowledgeable and has no vested interests are negatively associated; government and family & friends are the stakeholders that mostly influence consumer beef brand choice, although differences across consumer segments are substantial; age, gender, and education are factors that significantly influence consumer perceptions of stakeholder credibility. Marketing managers, policy-makers and their stakeholders in the food sector can use results and methods from this study to design both generic and brand promotion campaigns, especially to influence consumers’ perceptions on intangible yet valuable attributes of food, such as locally grown, ‘fair trade’, or sustainable.
-
Alston, J.M., J.W. Freebairn and J.S. James, 2001. Beggar-thy-neighbor advertising: theory and application to generic commodity promotion programs. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83(4): 888-902.
-
Alston, J.M., J.W. Freebairn and J.S. James, 2003. Distributional issues in check-off funded programs. Agribusiness, 19(3): 277- 287.
-
Andrew, M. and D. Kim, 2007. Revitalising suffering multinational brands: an empirical study. International Marketing Review, 24: 350-372.
-
Batie, S.S., 2008. Wicked problems and applied economics. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 90(5): 1176-1191.
-
Berlo, D.K., J.B. Lemert and R.J. Mertz, 1969. Dimensions for evaluating the acceptability of message sources. Public Opinion Quarterly 33: 563-576.
-
Bonnet, C. and M. Simioni, 2001. Assessing consumer response to protected designation of origin labeling: a mixed multinomial logit approach. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 28(4): 433-449.
-
Brester, G.W. and T.C. Schroeder, 1995. The impacts of brand and generic advertising on meat demand. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 77(4): 969-979.
-
Caswell, J.A. and E.M. Mojduszka, 1996. Using informational labeling to influence the market for quality in food products. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 78(5): 1248-1253.
-
Caswell, J.A., 1998. Should use of genetically modified organisms be labeled? AgBioForum, 1: 22-24.
-
Crawford, S.D., M.P. Couper and M.J. Lamias, 2001. Web surveys: perceptions of burden. Social Science Computer Review, 19(2): 146-162.
-
Cronkhite, G. and J. Liska, 1976. A critique of factor analytic approaches to the study of credibility. Communication Monographs, 43(2): 91-107.
-
Darby, M.R. and E. Karni, 1973. Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud. Journal of Law and Economics, 16(1): 67-88.
-
Dean, D.H., 1999. Brand endorsement, popularity, and event sponsorship as advertising cues affecting consumer pre-purchase attitudes. Journal of Advertising, 39(3): 1-12.
-
Dentoni, D. and H.C. Peterson, 2011. Multi-stakeholder sustainability alliances in agri-food chains: a theory of reasoned action approach. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 14(5): 83-108.
-
Dentoni, D. and T. Reardon, 2010. Small farms building global brands through social networks. Journal of Chain and Network Science, 10(3): 159-171.
-
Dentoni, D., G. Tonsor, R. Calantone and H.C. Peterson, 2010. Brand information mitigating negative shocks on animal welfare: is it more effective to distract consumers or make them aware? International Food and Agricultural Management Review, 13(4): 17-56.
-
Dholakia, R.R., 1986. Source credibility effects: a test of behavioral persistence. In: Wallendorf, M. and P. Anderson (eds.) Advances in consumer research. Association of Consumer Research, Provo, UT, USA, pp. 426-430.
-
Eiser, R.J., S. Miles and L.J. Frewer, 2002. Trust, perceived risk and attitudes toward food technologies. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32: 2423-2433.
-
Erdem, T. and J. Swait, 2004. Brand Credibility, Brand Consideration, and Choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1): 191-198.
-
Farina, E. and T. Reardon, 2000. Agrifood grades and standards in the extended Mercosur: their role in the changing agri-food system. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 82(5): 1170-1176.
-
Fishbein, M., 1967. A behaviour theory approach to the relations between beliefs about an object and the attitude toward the object. Readings in attitude theory and measurement. John Wiley, New York, NY, USA, pp. 389-400.
-
Freeman, R.E., 2010. Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 279 pp.
-
Frewer, L.J., C. Howard and R. Shepherd, 1998. The importance of initial attitudes on responses to communication about genetic engineering in food production. Agriculture and Human Values, 15: 15-30.
-
Frewer, L.J., C. Howard, D. Hedderley and R. Shepherd, 1997. The elaboration likelihood model and communication about food risks. Risk Analysis, 17(6): 759-770.
-
Frewer, L.J., J. Scholderer and L. Bredahl, 2003. Communicating about the risks and benefits of genetically modified foods: the mediating role of trust. Risk Analysis, 23: 1117-1133.
-
Frewer, L.J., J.C. Howard, D. Hedderley and R. Shepherd, 1996. What determines trust in information about food-related risks? Underlying psychological constructs. Risk Analysis, 16(4): 473-486.
-
Froelich, E.J., J.G. Carlberg and C.E. Ward, 2009. Willingness-to-pay for fresh brand name beef. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 57: 119-137.
-
Giovannucci, D. and T. Reardon, 2000. Understanding grades and standards and how to apply them. In: Giovannucci, D. (ed.) A guide to developing agricultural markets and agro-enterprises. The World Bank, Washington, DC, USA.
-
Goldsmith, R.E., B.A. Lafferty and S.J. Newell, 2000. The influence of corporate credibility on consumer attitudes and purchase intent. Corporate Reputation Review, 3(4): 304-318.
-
Graziano, C. and K. McGrath, 1986. Measuring the concept of credibility. Journalism Quarterly, 63: 451-62.
-
Grewal, D., J. Gotlieb and H. Marmorstein, 1994. The moderating effects of message framing and source credibility on the price-perceived risk relationship. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1): 145-153.
-
Grunert, K.G., 2002. Current issues in the understanding of consumer food choice. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 13(8): 275-285.
-
Hair, J.F., W.C. Black, B.J. Babin, R.E. Anderson and R.L. Tatham, 2006. Multivariate data analysis, 6th Edition. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.
-
Hatanaka, M., C. Bain and L. Busch, 2005. Third-party certification in the global agrifood system. Food Policy, 30: 354-369.
-
Hearit, K.M., 1995. ‘Mistakes were made’: Organizations, apologia, and crises of social legitimacy. Communication Studies, 46: 1-2.
-
Hovland, C.I. and W. Weiss, 1951. The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 4: 635-650.
-
Hovland, C.I., I.L. Janis and H.H. Kelley, 1953. Communication and persuasion. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, USA.
-
Jaffee, S and O. Masakure, 2005. Strategic use of private standards to enhance international competitiveness: vegetable exports from Kenya and elsewhere. Food Policy, 30(3): 316-333.
-
Kaiser, H.M., J.M. Alston, J.M. Crespi and R.J. Sexton, 2005. The economics of commodity promotion programs: lessons from California. Peter Lang Publishing, New York, NY, USA, 429 pp.
-
Kaplan, D., 2009. Structural equation modeling: foundations and extensions. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 272 pp.
-
Kelman, H and C. Hovland, 1953. Reinstatement’ of the communicator in delayed measurement of opinion change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48: 327-335.
-
Kerstetter, D. and M. Cho, 2004. Prior knowledge, credibility and information search. Annals of Tourism Research, 31(4): 961-985.
-
Kinnucan, H.W., H. Xiao, C.J. Hsia and J.D. Jackson, 1997. Effects of health information and generic advertising on US meat demand. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79(1): 13-23.
-
Konefal, J., M. Mascarenhas and M. Hatanaka, 2005. Governance in the global agro-food system: backlighting the role of transnational supermarket chains. Agriculture and Human Values, 22(3): 291-302.
-
Kozup, J.C., E.H. Creyer and S. Burton, 2003. Making healthful food choices: the influence of health claims and nutrition information on consumers’ evaluations of packaged food products and restaurant menu items. The Journal of Marketing, 67(2): 19-34.
-
Lafferty, B.A. and R.E. Goldsmith, 1999. Corporate credibility’s role in consumers’ attitudes and purchase intentions when a high versus a low credibility endorser is used in the ad. Journal of Business Research, 44(2): 109-116.
-
Loureiro, M.L. and J.J. McCluskey, 2000. Assessing consumer response to protected geographical identification labeling. Agribusiness, 16: 309-320.
-
Loureiro, M.L. and W.J. Umberger, 2005. Assessing consumer preferences for country-of-origin labeling. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 37(1): 49-63.
-
Loureiro, M.L. and W.J. Umberger, 2007. Estimating consumer willingness to pay for country-of-origin labeling. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 28(2): 287-301.
-
Lusk, J.L., J. Brown, M. Tyler, I. Prosaku, R. Thompson and J. Welsh, 2006. Consumer behavior, public policy, and country-of-origin labeling. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 28(2): 284-292.
-
Lusk, J.L., J. Roosen and J.A. Fox, 2003. Demand for beef from cattle administered growth hormones or fed genetically modified corn: a comparison of consumers in France, Germany, the United Kingdom and the United States. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85: 16-29.
-
Lutz, R., 1991. The role of attitude theory in marketing. In: Kassarjian, H.H. and J.J. Robertson (eds.) Perspectives in consumer behavior, 4th edition. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, pp. 317-339.
-
Manfredo, M.J. and A.D. Bright, 1991. A model for assessing the effects of communication on recreationists. Journal of Leisure Research, 23: 1-20.
-
Mazzocchi, M.A., W.B. Lobb, A. Traill and A. Cavicchi, 2008. Food scares and trust: a european study. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 59: 2-24.
-
McComas, K.A. and C.W. Trumbo, 2001. Source credibility in environmental health-risk controversies: application of Meyer’s credibility index. Risk Analysis, 21(3): 467-480.
-
McCroskey, J., 1969. A summary of experimental research on the effects of evidence in persuasive communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 55: 169-176.
-
Meyer, P., 1988. Defining and measuring credibility of newspapers: developing an index. Journalism Quarterly, 65: 567-574.
-
Mitchell, R.K., B.R. Agle and D.J. Wood, 1997. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4): 853-886.
-
Mors, M., W.H. Weenig, N. Ellemers, D.D.L. Daamen and M. Best-Waldhober, 2009. Public information: on why and when multiple information sources are more effective than single information sources in communication about CCS. Energy Procedia, 1(1): 4715-4718.
-
Newell, S.J. and R.E. Goldsmith, 2001. The development of a scale to measure perceived corporate credibility. Journal of Business Research, 52(3): 235-247.
-
Peterson, H.C., 2009. Transformational supply chains and the wicked problem of sustainability: aligning knowledge, innovation, entrepreneurship, and leadership. Journal on Chain and Network Science, 9(2): 71-82.
-
Poortinga, W. and N.F. Pidgeon, 2003. Exploring the dimensionality of trust in risk regulation. Risk Analysis, 23: 961-972.
-
Pornpitakpan, C., 2004. The persuasiveness of source credibility: a critical review of five decades’ evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34: 243-281.
-
Priest, S.H., H. Bonfadelli and M. Rusanen, 2003. The trust gap hypothesis: predicting support for biotechnology across national cultures as a function of trust in actors. Risk Analysis, 23: 751- 766.
-
Reardon, T., J.M. Codron, L. Busch, J. Bingen and C. Harris, 2001. Global change in agrifood grades and standards: agribusiness strategic responses in developing countries. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 2: 421-435.
-
Roe, B. and M.F. Teisl, 2007. Genetically modified food labeling: the impacts of message and messenger on consumer perceptions of labels and products. Food Policy, 32: 49-66.
-
Rowley, T.J., 1997. Moving beyond dyadic ties: a network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22(4): 887-910.
-
Siegrist, M., 2000. The influence of trust and perceptions of risks and benefits on the acceptance of gene technology. Risk Analysis, 20: 195-203.
-
Smith, A.P., J.A. Young and J. Gibson, 1999. How now, mad-cow? Consumer confidence and source credibility during the 1996 BSE scare. European Journal of Marketing, 33(11/12): 1107-1122.
-
Sobel, J., 2005. Interdependent preferences and reciprocity. Journal of Economic Literature, 43(2): 392-436.
-
Sternthal, B., R. Dholakia and C. Leavitt, 1978. The persuasive effect of source credibility: tests of cognitive response. Journal of Consumer Research, 4(4): 252-260.
-
Teegen, H., J.P. Doh and S. Vachani, 2004. The importance of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) in global governance and value creation: an international business research agenda. Journal of International Business Studies, 35: 463-483.
-
Tonsor, G.T., T.C. Schroeder, J.A. Fox and A. Biere, 2005. European preferences for beef steak attributes. Journal of Agricultura1 and Resource Economics, 30(2): 367-380.
-
Tybout, A.M., 1978. Relative effectiveness of three behavioral influence strategies as supplements to persuasion in a marketing context. Journal of Marketing Research, 15: 229-242.
-
Verbeke W. and R.W. Ward, 2006. Consumer interest in information cues denoting quality, traceability and origin: an application of ordered probit models to beef labels. Food Quality and Preference, 17: 453-467.
-
Verbeke, W., 2005. Consumer acceptance of functional foods: socio-demographic, cognitive and attitudinal determinants. Food Quality and Preference, 16: 45-57.
-
Ward, R.W. and C. Lambert, 1993. Generic promotion of beef: Measuring the impact of the US beef checkoff. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 44(3): 456-465.
-
Whitehead Jr., J.L., 1968. Factors of source credibility. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 54: 59-63.
-
Wiener, J.L. and J.C. Mowen, 1986. Source credibility: on the independent effects of trust and expertise. Advances in Consumer Research, 13: 306-310.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Full Text Views | 175 | 162 | 14 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 84 | 58 | 7 |
Consumers’ perceptions of stakeholder credibility: who has it and who perceives it
In: Journal on Chain and Network ScienceSearch for other papers by D. Dentoni in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by G. Tonsor in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by R. Calantone in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by H.C. Peterson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Based on the case of US consumer choice of beef steak brands, this study investigates how individual perceptions of information source credibility influence food brand choices. In particular, it tackles the questions: which stakeholders inside or outside the food chain are perceived as credible information sources in promoting food quality? Which consumer segments perceive different stakeholders as credible? What is the relationship between consumers’ perceptions of stakeholder credibility and their brand choices? Data are collected from a representative sample of 460 US citizens through an online survey in November 2009 and analyzed through a set of path models. Results provide evidence that: perceptions of stakeholder credibility overall influence their beef brand choices; consumer perceptions that a stakeholder is knowledgeable and has no vested interests are negatively associated; government and family & friends are the stakeholders that mostly influence consumer beef brand choice, although differences across consumer segments are substantial; age, gender, and education are factors that significantly influence consumer perceptions of stakeholder credibility. Marketing managers, policy-makers and their stakeholders in the food sector can use results and methods from this study to design both generic and brand promotion campaigns, especially to influence consumers’ perceptions on intangible yet valuable attributes of food, such as locally grown, ‘fair trade’, or sustainable.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Full Text Views | 175 | 162 | 15 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 84 | 58 | 7 |
