Continued value creation is paramount for the survival of firms competing in today’s high velocity global business environment. This paper presents a conceptual framework for understanding how firms can create and capture value within a highly volatile and uncertain business environment by exploiting both performance gaps and opportunity gaps through the development and use of flexible supply chain architectures. The choice of flexible organizational architecture allows for the continued reconfiguration of the independent modular components of the supply chain so as to achieve optimal leverage of both the firms core competencies as well as their collaborative partners complementary resources. The case of Cellars of Canterbury, a New Zealand based International wine marketing and distribution cooperative enterprise provides empirical support.
Afuah, A. (1998). Innovation management. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
Arthur, B. (1988). Competing technologies: an overview. In Giovanni Dosi et al. (eds), Technical change and economic theory, 590-607. NY: Columbia University Press.
Barney, J.B. (1996). Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage. NY: Addisson-Wesley.
Bettis, R.A., & Prahalad, C.K. (1995). The dominant logic: retrospective and extension. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 5-14.
Boehlje, M. (1999). Structural change in the agricultural industries: how do we measure, analyze, and understand them? American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 81:5, 1028-1041.
Burton-Jones, A. (1999). Knowledge Capitalism: Business, Work, and Learning in the New Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clark, K. B. (1985). The interaction of design hierarchies and market concepts in technological evolution. Research Policy, 14, 235-251.
Cooper, M. (1984). The wines and vineyards of New Zealand (1st ed.). Auckland, N.Z: Hodder & Stoughton.
Cyert, R.M., & March, J.G. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
David, P.A. (1985). Clio and the economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review, 75, 332-337.
Elvy, P. (200). Personal communication, December, 2000.
Galbraith, J. (1973). Designing Complex Organizations. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C.K. (1989). Strategic intent. Harvard Business Review, 89:3, 63-75.
Henderson, R.M., & Clark, K.B. (1990). Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 9-30.
Lawrence, P.R., & Lorsch, J.W. (1967). Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration. Homewood, IL: Irwin. Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 111-125.
Lorenzoni, G., & Lipparini, A. (1999). The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: a longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 317-338.
Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Prahalad, C.K. (1993). The role of core competencies in the corporation. Research/Technology Management, 36, 40-47.
Prahalad, C.K., & Bettis, R.A. (1986). The dominant logic: a new linkage between diversity and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 7, 485-501.
Prahalad, C.K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 90:3, 79-90.
Roberts, E.B., & Berry, C.A. (1985). Entering new businesses: selecting strategies for success. Sloan Management Review, 26, 3-17.
Schumpeter, J.A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sonka, S. (2000). Challenges in Managing the business. Paper presented at the AAEA Pre-conference workshop “Policy Implications in the Changing Structure of the Food System.” Tampa Bay, FL, July 29, 2000.
Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509-533.
Winegrowers of New Zealand. (2000). The BNZ wine and grape industry statistical annual, 2000. Auckland: Winegrowers of New Zealand.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Full Text Views | 79 | 54 | 5 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 46 | 28 | 0 |
Continued value creation is paramount for the survival of firms competing in today’s high velocity global business environment. This paper presents a conceptual framework for understanding how firms can create and capture value within a highly volatile and uncertain business environment by exploiting both performance gaps and opportunity gaps through the development and use of flexible supply chain architectures. The choice of flexible organizational architecture allows for the continued reconfiguration of the independent modular components of the supply chain so as to achieve optimal leverage of both the firms core competencies as well as their collaborative partners complementary resources. The case of Cellars of Canterbury, a New Zealand based International wine marketing and distribution cooperative enterprise provides empirical support.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Full Text Views | 79 | 54 | 5 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 46 | 28 | 0 |