How to manage a long-term buyer-supplier relationship successfully? The impact of network information on long-term buyer-supplier relationships in the Dutch potted plant and flower industry
In: Journal on Chain and Network ScienceSearch for other papers by Danny Pimentel Claro in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by D. Zylbersztajn in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by S.W.F. (Onno) Omta in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Recently, scholars have suggested that to understand fully the nature of a dyadic relationship, greater attention must be directed to the network context. In this study we drew on emerging perspectives on inter-firm governance and networks to develop a theoretical framework to understand the successful governance of long-term buyer-supplier relationships. In order to test the research framework, we conducted a survey among 174 merchant distributors (buyers) and 67 growers (suppliers) in the Dutch potted plant and flower industry. In the estimated models, we found several positive impacts of the information obtained from the business network on the dimensions of relationship management, and ultimately performance, both in terms of operations as well as finance. The results of this study support our rationale that the business network compensates for the information asymmetry assumed in transaction cost economics. Although there are several similarities in our findings, buyers and suppliers use clearly different information strategies to achieve success. While the most successful distributors tend to take the ‘hard’, tangible approach using transaction-specific investments and fostering joint action, the successful growers take the ‘soft’, social approach by putting emphasis on norms of flexibility in the relationship. Managers may use these findings to check the adequacy of their business networks and their approach to relationship management.
-
Ahuja, M. K. and Carley, K. M. (1999), “Network structure in virtual organizations”, Organization Science, Vol.10 No.6, pp.741-757.
-
Anderson, J. C. and Gerbing, D. W. (1988), “Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach”, Psychological Bulletin, Vol.103 No.3, pp.411-423.
-
Anderson, J. C. and Narus, J. A. (1990), “A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships”, Journal of Marketing, Vol.54 No.January, pp.42-58.
-
Anderson, E. and Weitz, B. (1992), “The use of pledges to build and sustain commitment in distribution channels”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.29, February, pp.18-34.
-
Anderson, J. C., Hakansson, H., and Johanson, J. (1994), “Dyadic business relationship within a business network context”, Journal of Marketing, Vol.58, October, pp.22-38.
-
Antia, K. and Frazier, G. L. (2001), “The severity of contract enforcement in interfirm channel relationships”, Journal of Marketing, Vol.65, October, pp.67-81.
-
Barney, J. B. and Hansen, M. H. (1994), “Trustworthiness as a source of competitive advantage”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.15, Winter Special Issue, pp.175-190.
-
Bello, D. C. and Gilliland, D. I. (1997), “The effect of output controls, process controls, and flexibility on export channel performance”, Journal of Marketing, Vol.61 No. January, pp.22-38.
-
Bensaou, M. and Venkatraman, N. (1995), “Configurations of inter-organizational relationships: a comparison between U.S. and Japanese automakers”, Management Science, Vol.41 No.9, pp. 1471-1492.
-
Bensaou, M. (1999), “Portfolios of buyer-supplier relationships”, Sloan Management Review, Vol.40 No.4, pp.35-44.
-
Blankenburg, D., Eriksson, K., and Johanson, J. (1999), “Creating value through mutual commitment to business network relationships”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.20 No.5, pp.467-486.
-
Bradach, J. L. and Eccles, R. G. (1989), “Price, authority and trust”, Annual Review of Sociology, Vol.15, pp.97-118.Anderson, J. C., Hakansson, H., and Johanson, J. (1994), “Dyadic business relationship within a business network context”, Journal of Marketing, Vol.58, October, pp.22-38.
-
Burt, R. S. (1997), “The contingent value of the social capital”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.42 No.June, pp.339-365.
-
Claro, D. P. (2004), Manging business network and buyer-supplier relationship: how information obtained from the business network attects trust, transaction specific investments, collaboration and performance in the Dutch potted plant and flower industry, Universal Press: Veenendal, 196p. (Doctoral Dissertation: Wageningen University)
-
Contractor, F. J. and Lorange, P. (1988), Why should firms cooperate? The strategy and economics basis for cooperative ventures, In: Contractor, F. J. and Lorange, P. (eds.), Cooperative strategies in international business, Lexington Books , Lexington, p.3-30.
-
Cook, K. S. and Emerson, R. M. (1978), “Power, Equity and commitment in exchange networks”, American Sociological Review, Vol.43 No. October, pp.721-739.
-
Doney, P. M. and Cannon, J. P. (1997), “An examination of the nature of trust in buyer-seller relationships”, Journal of Marketing, Vol.61, April, pp.35-51.
-
Dyer, J. H. (1996), “Specialized supplier networks as a source of competitive advantage: evidence from the auto industry”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.17, pp.271-291.
-
Dyer, J. H. and Singh, H. (1998), “The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage”, Academy of Management Review, Vol.23 No.4, pp.660-679.
-
Elshof, P. (1998), The Dutch flower sector: structure, trends and employment, International Labour Office, Geneva ((SAP 2.68/WP.122)).
-
Gadde, L. E. and Snehota, I. (2000), “Making the most of supplier relationships”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol.29 No.4, pp. 305-316.
-
Ganesan, S. (1994), “Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer-seller relationships”, Journal of Marketing, Vol.58 No.2, pp. 1-19.
-
Geyskens, I., Steenkamp, J-B. E. M., and Kumar, N. (1998), “Generalizations about trust in marketing channel relationships using meta-analysis”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol.15, pp.223-248.
-
Granovetter, M. (1985), “Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness”, American Journal of Sociology, Vol.91 No.3, pp.481-510.
-
Gulati, R. (1998), “Alliances and networks”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.19 No.4, pp.293-317.
-
Gulati, R., Nohria, N., and Zaheer, A. (2000), “Strategic Networks”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.21 No.3, pp.203-215.
-
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R., Tatham, R. L., and Black, W. C. (1998), Multivariate data analysis, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
-
Hakansson, H. and Johanson, J. (1993), The network as a governance structure: interfirm cooperation beyond markets and hierarchies, In: Grabher, G. (eds.), The embedded firm: on the socioeconomics of industrial networks, Routledge: London, p.36-51.
-
Hakansson, H. and Snehota, I. (1995), Developing relationships in business network, Routledge, New York.
-
Hakansson, H., Havila, V., and Pedersen, A.-C. (1999), “Learning in Networks”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol.28 No.5, pp.443-452.
-
Heide, J. B. and John, G. (1990), “Alliances in industrial purchasing: the determinants of joint action in buyer supplier relationships”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.27 No.February, pp.24-36.
-
Heide, J. B. and Miner, A. S. (1992), “The shadow of the future: effects of anticipated and frequency of contract on buyer-seller cooperation”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.35 No.2, pp.265-291.
-
Heide, J. B. (1994), “Interorganizational governance in marketing channels”, Journal of Marketing, Vol.58 No. January, pp.71-85.
-
Hobbs, J. E. (1996), “A transaction cost approach to supply chain management”, Supply Chain Management, Vol.1 No.2, pp.15-27.
-
Jarillo, J. C. (1988), “On strategic networks”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.9 No.1, pp.31-41.
-
John, G. (1984), “An empirical investigation of some antecedents of opportunism in a marketing channel”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.21, pp.278-289.
-
Joreskog, K. G. and Sorbom, D. (1996), LISREL 8: structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS comand language, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
-
Kalenzi, E. (2000), Marketing channel performance in the flower industry: a case on Kenya-Netherlands flower business, Wageningen School of Management, WUR, 52p. (MBA Thesis)
-
Kemp, R. G. M. and Ghauri, P. N. (2001), “Interdependency in joint ventures: the relationship between dependence asymmetry and performance”, Jounal on Chain and Network Science, Vol.1 No.2, pp.101-110.
-
Kenis, P. and Knoke, D. (2002), “How organizational field networks shape interorganizational tie-formation rates”, Academy of Management Review, Vol.27 No.2, pp.275-293.
-
Klein, S., Frazier, G. L., and Roth, V. J. (1990), “A transaction cost analysis model of channel integration in international markets”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.27, May, pp.196-208.
-
Kogut, B. (2000), “The network as knowledge: generative rules and the emergence of structure”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.21, pp.405-425.
-
Lannings, J. (2000), EU market survey 2000: Cut flowers and foliage, CBI, The Hague.
-
Lusch, R. F. and Brown, J. R. (1996), “Interdependency, contracting, and relational behavior in market channels”, Journal of Marketing, Vol.60 No.October, pp.19-38.
-
Malhotra, N. K. (1999), Marketing research: an applied orientation, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
-
Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality (2001), The Dutch floriculture sector, Plantijn Casparie, The Hague.
-
Mohr, J. J and Speckman, R. (1994), “Characteristics of partnership success: partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.15 No.2, pp.135-152.
-
Morgan, R. M. and Hunt, S. D. (1994), “The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing”, Journal of Marketing, Vol.58 No. July, pp.20-38.
-
Murphy, G. B., Trailer, J. W., and Hill, R. C. (1996), “Measuring performance in entrepreneurship research”, Journal of Business Research, Vol.36, pp.15-23.
-
Nohria, N. and Eccles, R. G. (1992), Face-to-face: making network organzations work, In: Nohria, N. and Eccles, R. G. (eds.), Networks and organization: structure, form and action, Harvard Business School Press , Boston, p.288-308.
-
Nohria, N. and Gulati, R. (1994), Firms and their environments, In: Smelser, J. N. and Swedberg, R. (eds.), The handbook of economic sociology, Princeton University Press , New Jersey, p.529-555.
-
Noordewier, T. G., John, G., and Nevin, J. R. (1990), “Performance outcomes of purchasing arrangements in industrial buyer-vendor relationship”, Journal of Marketing, Vol.54 No. oct, pp.80-94.
-
Nooteboom, B., Berger, H., and Noorderhaven, N. G. (1997), “Effects of trust and governance on relational risk”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.36, pp.794-829.
-
Ohmae, K. (1989), “The global logic of strategic alliances”, Harvard Business Review, Vol.67 No.2, pp.143-154.
-
Omta, S. W. F., Trienekens, J. H., and Beers, G. (2001), “Chain and network science: a research framework”, Journal on Chain and Network Science, Vol.1 No.1, pp.1-6.
-
Powell, W. W. (1990), “Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization”, Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol.12, pp.295-336.
-
Prahalad, C. K. and Hamel, G. (1990), “The core competence of the corporation”, Harvard Business Review, Vol.68 No.3, pp.79-91.
-
Rigby, D. K., Reichheld, F. F., and Schefter, P. (2002), “Fuja dos quatro riscos do CRM”, Harvard Business Review, Vol.80 No.2, pp. 101-110.
-
Rindfleish, A. and Heide, J. B. (1997), “Transaction cost analysis: past, present and future applications”, Journal of Marketing, Vol.61 No.October, pp.30-54.
-
Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., and Camerer, C. (1998), “Not so different after all: a cross-discipline view of trust”, Academy of Management Review, Vol.23 No.3, pp.393-404.
-
Salancik, G. R. (1995), “Wanted: a good network theory of organization”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.40, pp.345-349.
-
Saxenian, A. (1991), “The origin and dynamics of production networks in Silicon Valley”, Research Policy, Vol.10, pp.423-437.
-
Sebenius, J. K. (2002), “The hidden challenge of cross-border negotiations”, Harvard Business Review No. march, pp.76-85.
-
Smith, J. B. and Barclay, D. W. (1997), “The effects of Organizational differences and trust on the effectiveness of selling partner relationships”, Journal of Marketing, Vol.61, January, pp.3-21.
-
Stern, L. W., El-Ansary, A. I., and Coughlan, A. T. (1996), Marketing channels, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
-
Thorelli, H. B. (1986), “Networks: between markets and hierarchies”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.7, pp.37-51.
-
Venkatraman, N. and Ramanujam, V. (1986), “Measurement of business performance in strategy research: a comparison of approaches”, Academy of Management Review, Vol.11 No.4, pp.801-814.
-
Wathne, K., Biong, H., and Heide, J. B. (2001), “Choice of supplier in embedded markets: relationship and marketing program effects”, Journal of Marketing, Vol.65, April, pp.54-66.
-
Williamson, O. E. (1985), The economic institutions of capitalism, Free Press, New York.
-
Williamson, O. E. (1996), The mechanism of governance, Oxford University Press, New York.
-
Yilmaz, C. and Hunt, S. D. (2001), “Salesperson cooperation: the influence of relational, task, organizational, and personal factors.”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol.29 No.4, pp. 335-357.
-
Zaheer, A. and Venkatraman, N. (1995), “Relational governance as an interorganizational strategy: an empirical test of the role of trust in economic exchange”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.16 No.5, pp.373-392.
-
Zaheer, A., McEvily, B., and Perrone, V. (1998), “Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance”, Organization Science, Vol.9 No.2, pp.141-159.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Full Text Views | 154 | 120 | 3 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 96 | 56 | 2 |
How to manage a long-term buyer-supplier relationship successfully? The impact of network information on long-term buyer-supplier relationships in the Dutch potted plant and flower industry
In: Journal on Chain and Network ScienceSearch for other papers by Danny Pimentel Claro in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by D. Zylbersztajn in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by S.W.F. (Onno) Omta in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Recently, scholars have suggested that to understand fully the nature of a dyadic relationship, greater attention must be directed to the network context. In this study we drew on emerging perspectives on inter-firm governance and networks to develop a theoretical framework to understand the successful governance of long-term buyer-supplier relationships. In order to test the research framework, we conducted a survey among 174 merchant distributors (buyers) and 67 growers (suppliers) in the Dutch potted plant and flower industry. In the estimated models, we found several positive impacts of the information obtained from the business network on the dimensions of relationship management, and ultimately performance, both in terms of operations as well as finance. The results of this study support our rationale that the business network compensates for the information asymmetry assumed in transaction cost economics. Although there are several similarities in our findings, buyers and suppliers use clearly different information strategies to achieve success. While the most successful distributors tend to take the ‘hard’, tangible approach using transaction-specific investments and fostering joint action, the successful growers take the ‘soft’, social approach by putting emphasis on norms of flexibility in the relationship. Managers may use these findings to check the adequacy of their business networks and their approach to relationship management.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Full Text Views | 154 | 120 | 3 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 96 | 56 | 2 |
