Considered as the legitimate son and heir of Amun, Khonsu gained importance during the Ramesside Period in parallel with the birth of the Renaissance doctrine. This prominence is reflected in the biographical and genealogical information, which documents a substantial increase in the number of individuals performing administrative and religious functions for the different forms of Khonsu by the Twenty-First Dynasty.
The complete prosopography of the personnel relating to the cult of Khonsu in Thebes Neferhotep presents new insights into a collective, subordinated to the clergy of Amun and active in more than one cult throughout the Karnak complex, but which fulfilled a significant role at Thebes. In this regard, the title of Third ḥm-nṯr priest of Khonsu must be highlighted; the contextualization of the emergence of this office and the study of its holders builds solid foundations for a better understanding of the Theban cultic and administrative domains leading up to and during the Twenty-First Dynasty.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Beckerath J. von “Die “Stele der Verbannten” in Museum des Louvre” RdÉ 1968 20 7 36
Berlandini J. “Petits monuments royaux de la XXIe à la XXVe Dynastie” BdÉ 1979 81 89 114
Bonhême M.-A. “Hérihor fut-il effectivement roi?” bifao 1979 79 267 283
Bonhême M.-A. Les noms royaux dans l’Égypte de la Troisième Période Intermédiaire 1987 Le Caire IFAO BdE 98. pifao 657
Broekman G.P.F. “The Leading Theban Priests of Amun and their Families under Libyan Rule” jea 2010 96 125 148
Broekman G.P.F. “On the Chronology and Genealogy of the Second, Third and Fourth Prophets of Amun in Thebes During the Twenty-First Dynasty in Egypt” gm 2000 174 25 36
Broekman G.P.F. “Theban Priestly and Governmental Offices and Titles in the Libyan Period” zäs 2011 138 93 115
Daressy G. “Les sépultures des Prêtres d´Ammon à Deir el-Bahari” asae 1900 1 141 148
Dautant A. Deguara L., Sénac J.-P. & Servajean F. “La tombe thébaine de la famille de Khonsoumes, père divin d’Amon-Rê, roi des dieux (XXIe dynastie)” Actes du Colloque Égypte Ancienne. Rites Fúneraires, Société Archéologique de Montpellier. Musée Languedocien, Montpellier, 14 novembre 2014 2014 Montpellier Société Archéologique de Montpellier 61 72
Dembitz G. Hudecz A. & Petrik M. “The Oracular Inscription of the High Priest of Amun Menkheperre in the Khonsu Temple at Karnak” Commerce and Economy in Ancient Egypt 2010 Proceedings of the Third International Congress for Young Egyptologists 25–27 September 2009 Budapest Oxford Archaeopress 41 54 bar International Series 2131
Dodson A. Afterglow of Empire. Egypt from the Fall of the New Kingdom to the Saite Renaissance 2012 Cairo American University in Cairo Press
Forgeau A. “Horus enfant, quel nom, quel champ d’action?” bsfe 2002 153 6 23
Gasse A. Données nouvelles administratives et sacerdotales sur l’organisation du domaine d’Amon XXe–XXIe Dynasties: à la lumière des papyrus Prachov, Reinhardt et Grundbuch (avec édition princeps des papyrus Louvre AF 6345 et 6346–7) 1988 Vol. 1 BdE 104 Le Caire IFAO
Jamen F. “Les quatrièmes prophétes d’Amon au tournant du Ier millénaire av. J.-C. À propos de la famille d’Imn-ms (P.Boulaq 9)” bifao 2011 111 229 241
Jamen F. La société thébaine sous la XXIe dynastie (1069–945 avant J.-C.) 2012 PhD Dissertation. Université-Lumière Lyon 2
Jansen-Winkeln K. Hornung E., Krauss R., Warburton D.A. & Eaton-Krauss M. “Relative Chronology of Dyn. 21” Ancient Egyptian Chronology 2006 Leiden/Boston Brill 218 233
Jansen-Winkeln K. “Der thebanische ‘Gottesstaat’” Orientalia 2001 70 153 182
Kees H. Die Hohenpriester des Amun von Karnak von Herihor bis zum Ende der Äthiopenzeit 1964 PdÄ 4 Leiden Brill
Kees H. Das Priestertum im ägyptischen Staat: vom Neuen Reich bis zur Spätzeit. Indices und Nachträge 1958 PdÄ 6 Leiden Brill
Klotz D. Thiers C. “The Theban Cult of Chonsu the Child in the Ptolemaic Period” Documents de Théologies Thébaines Tardives (D3T 1) 2009 CENiM 3 Montpellier Université Paul Valéry (Montpellier III) 95 134
Kruchten J.-M. Les annales des prêtres de Karnak (XXI–XXIIImes Dynasties) et autres textes contemporains relatifs a l´initiation des prêtres d’Amon ola 1989 32 Leuven Departement Oriëntalistiek
Leahy A. Leahy A. “Abydos in the Libyan Period” Libya and Egypt c. 1300–750 B.C. 1990 London School of Oriental and African Studies, Centre of Near and Middle Eastern Studies, Society for Libyan Studies 155 200
Lull J. Broekman G.P.F., Demarée R.J. & Kaper O.E. “Beginning and End of the High Priest of Amun Menkheperre” 2009 The Libyan Period in Egypt. Historical and Cultural Studies into Twenty-First-24st Dynasties: Proceedings of a Conference 25–27 October 2007 Leiden University 241 249 Egyptologische Uitgaven Egyptological Publications 23. Leiden: Nederlands Instituut voor Het Nabije Oosten; Leuven: Peeters
Lull J. Los sumos sacerdotes de Amón tebanos de la wHm mswt y a Dinastía XXI (ca. 1083–945 a.C.) 2006 Oxford Archaeopress bar International Series 1469
Meulenaere H. de “Isis et Mout du mammisi” ola 1982 13 25 29
Naguib S.-A. Le clergé féminin d’Amon thébain à la 21e dynasty ola 1990 38 Louvain Peeters
Niwinski A. “Le passage de la XXe à la XXIIe dynastie. Chronologie et histoire politique” bifao 1995 95 329 360
Niwinski A. Second Find Of Deir El-Bahari (Coffins) Nos. 6069–6082. Catalogue General of Egyptian Antiquities 1999 Vol. 2 Fasc. 1 Cairo Ministry of Culture, Supreme Council of Antiquities of Egypt
Niwinski A. Studies on the Illustrated Theban Funerary Papyri of the 11th and 10th Centuries B.C. obo 1989 86 Freiburg Universitätsverlag Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
Niwinski A. Twenty-First Dynasty Coffins from Thebes. Chronological and Typological Studies 1988 Theben V. Mainz am Rhein Philipp von Zabern
Posener M.G. “Recherches sur le dieu Khonsou” Ann CdF 1967 67 345 349
Roth A.M. “Some New Texts of Herihor and Ramesses IV in the Great Hypostyle Hall at Karnak” jnes 1983 42 1 43 53
Sousa R. “«Área de acesso reservado»: tradição e mudança na organização da necrópole tebana” cem 2014 3 131 150
Spencer N. Lloyd A.B. “Priests and Temples: Pharaonic” A Companion to Ancient Egypt 2010 Vol. 1 Oxford Wiley-Blackwell 255 273
Taylor J.H. Eyre C.J. “Nodjmet, Payankh and Herihor. The end of the New Kingdom reconsidered” ola 1998 82 Louvain Peeters 1143 1155
Traunecker C. Clarysse W., Schoors A. & Willems H. “Les graffiti des frères Horaisis et Horemheb. Une famille de prêtes sous les derniers Ptolémées” Egyptian Religion: the Last Thousand Years. Study Dedicated to the Memory of Jan Quaegebeur 1998 vol. II Leuven Peeters 1191 1229
Villar Gómez A.M. Lekov T. & Buzov E. “An Overview of the Servants of Khonsu during the Third Intermediate Period at Thebes” 2014 Cult and Belief in Ancient Egypt. Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress for Young Egyptologists 22–25 September 2012 Sofia, Bulgaria Sofia Bulgarian Institute of Egyptology 81 87
Vittmann G. Priester und Beamte im Theben der Spätzeit. Genealogische und prosopographische Untersuchungen zum thebanischen Priester- und Beamtentum der 25. und 26. Dynastie 1978 Beiträge zur Ägyptologie 1 Wien Afro-Pub
Forgeau, “Horus enfant,” 8; Naguib, Le clergé féminin, 53–54 and 207–10; de Meulenaere, “Isis et Mout”; Berlandini, “Petits monuments,” 101–09.
As mentioned, for instance, in: Taylor, “Nodjmet, Payankh and Herihor,” 1144; or Jansen-Winkeln, “Relative chronology,” 226. For the inscriptions and decorations of the temple, see Khonsui and ii.
Broekman, “Theban Priestly and Governmental Offices,” 95, “The Leading Theban Priests,” 125, and “On the Chronology and Genealogy,” 25; Jamen, “Les quatrièmes prophétes d’Amon.”
Jansen-Winkeln, “Relative chronology,” 229. As regards this possible change in the political structure and the presence of the northern kings in Upper Egypt, we should bear in mind that, while pharaohs were previously unnamed, nine burials of Theban priests now document the name of both Amenemope and Pinudjem ii—as a king and hpa respectively—in braces, pendants or bandages (tip, 272 and 421). Further, from Pinudjem ii onwards, the mummy bandages dedicated by the Theban HPAs to the gods (Amun, Khonsu, Montu . . .) no longer refer to them as their “father” but their “lord/master,” which seems to be a more modest tone that could be seen as a sign of the southern ruler’s more restricted power (tip, 416).
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 882 | 215 | 34 |
| Full Text Views | 299 | 13 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 98 | 37 | 0 |
Considered as the legitimate son and heir of Amun, Khonsu gained importance during the Ramesside Period in parallel with the birth of the Renaissance doctrine. This prominence is reflected in the biographical and genealogical information, which documents a substantial increase in the number of individuals performing administrative and religious functions for the different forms of Khonsu by the Twenty-First Dynasty.
The complete prosopography of the personnel relating to the cult of Khonsu in Thebes Neferhotep presents new insights into a collective, subordinated to the clergy of Amun and active in more than one cult throughout the Karnak complex, but which fulfilled a significant role at Thebes. In this regard, the title of Third ḥm-nṯr priest of Khonsu must be highlighted; the contextualization of the emergence of this office and the study of its holders builds solid foundations for a better understanding of the Theban cultic and administrative domains leading up to and during the Twenty-First Dynasty.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 882 | 215 | 34 |
| Full Text Views | 299 | 13 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 98 | 37 | 0 |