Abstract
Edible scarab beetles are important repositories for nutritive and bioactive compounds, but this information remains largely unexplored. This study explored the nutritional and therapeutic properties of two edible scarab beetles from three different locations (Embu, Murang’a and Nairobi Counties) in Kenya. Morphological and molecular characterization of the wild collected larvae revealed two important edible beetle species (Cetonia aurata L. and Oryctes rhinoceros L.). The larvae of both species are excellent source of crude proteins (44% for O. rhinoceros and 63% for C. aurata). The larvae of O. rhinoceros were rich in minerals, particularly calcium (15.75-22.65 mg/g) and potassium (13.62-22.88 mg/g). The anti-radical activity of C. aurata larvae ranged between 91% and 92% across the various target sites. Lysine was the most important and abundant amino acid in both larvae (>5 mg/g). The larvae of C. aurata and O. rhinoceros are a good source of unsaturated fatty acids like Methyl-8Z, 11Z, 14Z-eicosatrienoate (32 mg/g) and Methyl-9Z-octadecenoate (9.47-120.84 mg/g). The entomochemicals of phenolic nature derived from the beetle larvae portray a unique opportunity to supply and improve high quality nutritious food with enhanced ability to get-rid of free radicals, thus promoting good health and well-being of the consumers. Future development of foods supplemented with scarab beetle larvae derived products must consider the preservation of potential benefits of not only nutrients, but also nutraceuticals. However, in-depth research is still needed to guarantee the bioactivity in processed foods and ensure quality control test before the release of these products to the market.
1 Introduction
The world population is projected to reach 9.2 billion by the year 2050, with most of the unprecedented demographic dynamism reportedly occurring in low-income countries (Bongaarts, 2009). This presents a challenge to food supply chain disruption and nutrition security, as was intensified by the recent pandemic of COVID-19. It became evident that adequate nutrition plays a fundamental role in strengthening the immune system, thereby reducing mortality rates (Béné et al., 2021). Ensuring food security by providing nutrient-rich foods is of utmost concern due to the increased prevalence of lifestyle disorders such as obesity, cognitive disorders, and cases of malnutrition.
Globally, approximately 827 million people are reportedly hunger-stricken with 24.8% prevalence of undernourishment being reported (McGuire, 2013). For instance, local inhabitants of Africa, Asia and Latin America continue to suffer from under-nutrition, particularity protein energy malnutrition (PEM) due to insufficient palatable sources of protein (Ajobiewe et al., 2021). This situation is projected to worsen as the demand for animal-based protein increases, alongside growing food insecurity. Unfortunately, the efforts to tackle food insecurity have greatly focused on the conventional patterns of food production, which have proven unsustainable due to their ecological impact on natural ecosystems and biodiversity (Steenson and Buttriss, 2020). Therefore, there is need for people to start embracing alternative food systems (Roohani et al., 2013; Van Huis et al., 2013).
Entomophagy serves as a sustainable alternative to traditional sources of food and feed benefiting the environment, health, and livelihoods (Van Huis et al., 2013). Insects have served as sources of food and medicine since ancient times (Laureati et al., 2016). These insects are highly diverse, abundantly present in nature for sustainable harvesting and are endowed with several therapeutic and functional food properties (Mudalungu et al., 2021; Rumpold and Schlüter, 2013). Apart from the ecological benefits, insects such as beetles are known to contain high protein content with excellent essential amino acids, micronutrients, antinutrients, fat-soluble tocopherols and bioactive molecules which are essential in combating metabolic disorders (Anaduaka et al., 2021; Mudalungu et al., 2021; Omotoso, 2018). For instance, adult Holotrichia parallela Motschulsky is known to be an excellent source of protein (70.27%), minerals (3.61%) especially potassium (2,851 mg/kg) and low crude fat (10.36%) (Hu et al., 2010). Additionally, the larval stage of Protaetia brevitarsis Lewis, traditionally used as medicine in Asia, is documented as an excellent source of bioactive components with excellent antioxidant activities (Suh et al., 2011). Insects also have better protein digestibility compared with conventional sources of protein such as soya beans and milk protein casein (Akinnawo and Ketiku, 2000). The coconut rhinoceros beetle (Oryctes rhinoceros L.) and the green rose chafer (Cetonia aurata L.) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) are also considered a delicacy in many parts of the world (Félix, 2019; Van Huis, 2021). Although, some documented information exists on the nutritional composition of O. rhinoceros, no similar knowledge on C. aurata has been reported. This study sought to explore novel functional properties of two scarab beetles (C. aurata and O. rhinoceros) from three different Counties (Embu, Murang’a and Nairobi) in Kenya. We hypothesized that the bio-functional properties of the two beetle species’ larvae are influenced by the sampling geographical location and the species type. The intention was to bridge the scarce knowledge gap on the medicinal properties and nutrient profiles of these beetles, highlighting their possible use as functional ingredients in food fortification.
2 Materials and methods
Sample collection
A quasi-experimental design was conducted on C. aurata and O. rhinoceros larvae collected from Embu, Murang’a and Nairobi Counties in Kenya during the off-rainy season in January and February 2023. These three Counties were chosen based on their agricultural activities and diversity of organic waste suitable (cattle and poultry manure) as food substrates for the beetle larvae. From each county, random site where larvae naturally occurred was chosen, and the next sampling site was set to be distant from the previous one. Three sites were sampled in each county: Embu County (Nthangaiya (S00°27′58.9″, E037°33′58.6″), University of Embu (S00°30′41.3″, E037°27′29.5″) and Gachururiri (S00°42′25.6″, E037°28′58.7″)); Murang’a County (Kiunyu (S00°57′21.8″, E037°1′9.2″), Njoguini (S00°43′17.7″, E037°7′38.2″) and Kairi (S00°36′48.3″, E037°0′44.3″)) and Nairobi County (Mwiki (S01°13′47.2″, E036°57′1.0″), Ruai (S01°17′27.7″, E037°0′29.6″) and Kangemi (S01°15′53.9″, E036°44′37.5″)) (Figure 1). Morphological identification of the beetle larvae was performed using taxonomic keys from Bedford (1974) and CABI (2023) (Figure 2). About 500-600 larvae were collected at each site (Murang’a and Nairobi) and 250-300 were found in Embu. Those from the same area were merged for further processing. The collected larvae samples were then transported in perforated plastic containers with wet substrate within 24 hours to the Animal Rearing and Containment Unit (ARCU) at the International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), Nairobi, Kenya for further processing and analysis.
Map of Kenya showing the three countries in which the larvae collection was done. The red dots in each county represent the exact location in which the larvae were obtained.
Citation: Journal of Insects as Food and Feed 11, 2 (2025) ; 10.1163/23524588-00001009
Morphologically distinct Scarab larvae; C. aurata (A, under 1.9× magnification) and O. rhinoceros (B). At the third instar, the larvae of C. aurata has a length of 55 mm, a diameter of 35 mm and three pairs of limbs, while O. rhinoceros has a length of 85 mm, a diameter of 45 mm and also three pairs of limbs.
Citation: Journal of Insects as Food and Feed 11, 2 (2025) ; 10.1163/23524588-00001009
Molecular identification of the beetle larvae from the various target sites
Molecular tools employed included DNA extraction from individual legs of the beetle larvae collected from the various sites using Isolate II Genomic Kit (Bio line), following the manufacturer’s instructions. The obtained DNA was then amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using two primers (one for each insect) due to lack of universality of a single primer to target the COI mitochondrial gene in the O. rhinoceros beetle and 28S ribosomal RNA in the C. aurata. The COI gene section was targeted using LCO 1490 (forward, 5′-GGTCAACAAATCATAAAGATATTGG-3′) and HCO 2198 (reverse, 5′-TAAACTTCAGGGTGACCAAAAAATCA-3′) primers (Wilson, 2012). The mixture for PCR reaction contained 4 μL of O. rhinoceros DNA, 6 μL 5× HOT FIREPOL® Master Mix, 20.8 μL RNA free water, 0.6 μL forward primer and 0.6 μL of reverse primer (10 mM). The PCR program was set at 95 °C for 15 mins followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 45 secs, 53 °C for 1 min, 72 °C for 1 min and final extension at 72 °C for 5 mins. On the other hand, 28s rRNA primers were Lep D 2 forward (5′-AGTCGTGTTGCTTGATAGTGCAG-3′) and Lep-D2 reverse (5′-TTGGTCCGTGTTTCAAGACGGG-3′). For this reaction, the PCR mixture contained 2 μL of C. aurata DNA, 6 μL 5× HOT FIREPOL® Master Mix, 11 μL PCR water, 0.5 μL forward (10 mM) and 0.5 μL reverse primer (10 mM). The PCR program was set at 95 °C for 15 mins, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 30 secs, 58.8 °C for 30 secs, 72 °C for 1 min and final extension of 72 °C for 10 mins. The resulting PCR amplicons were confirmed using gel electrophoresis (2% agarose), which was viewed under UV light using Kodak Gel Logic 200 Imaging System (SPW Industrial, Laguna Hills, CA, USA). The remaining PCR amplicons were cleaned using ExoSAP-IT (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA) then sequenced by Macrogen Inc. (Amsterdam, the Netherlands). A BLAST tool (Sonnhammer and Durbin, 1995) was used to reveal the identity by querying the obtained sequences against the known sequences in Gene bank nr (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi; accessed on 19 May 2023). Alignment was done using the MAFFT plugin in Geneious Prime software version 2020.2.2 (Kearse et al., 2012), where the obtained sequences were aligned with available beetle related sequences sourced from Gene bank nr Database. PhyML 3.0 was used to create maximum-likelihood phylogenies, with automated model selection based on the Akaike information criteria (Guindon et al., 2010).
Beetle larvae sample preparation for proximate analysis
The beetle larvae were thoroughly rinsed with tap water before being asphyxiated in −20 °C freezer for 3 hours to immobilize them. Thereafter, approximately 250-600 larvae per sampling site were degutted and then oven dried (WTB binder, Tuttlingen, Germany) for 24 hours at 60 °C. The dried samples were then ground using a GRT-750A(K) grinder (Zhejiang, China). The proximate parameters such as crude protein, moisture content, dry matter, fiber and ash were estimated following the protocols by Association of Official Analytical Chemists (Helrich, 1990). The moisture and dry matter content were determined by oven drying at 135 °C for 2 hours. Ash content was determined by igniting 1 g of the samples at 550 °C in muffle furnace (Heraeus-Kundendienst, Düsseldorf, Germany). Kjeldhal method was applied for the estimation of crude protein content. A conversion factor (Kp) of 4.76 was considered for nitrogen to protein conversion in the whole larvae to avoid overestimation due to presence of nonprotein nitrogen content as reported in the darkling beetle; Alphitobius diaperinus and the yellow mealworm; Tenebrio molitor by Janssen et al. (2017). Crude fiber was determined by acid and base digestion in a fiber analyzer SA30520200 (FIWE, Velp Scientifica, Usmate, Italy).
Total flavonoids content (TFC)
Aluminum chloride colorimetric assay was used to measure the TFC following the protocol described by Mokaya et al. (2022) with minor modifications. To 50 mg of each sample, 1 mL 50% methanol was added, vortexed using Vortex-Genie 2 then centrifuged at 4,200 rpm for 10 mins. The supernatant (500 μL) was then mixed with 3.2 mL of 50% methanol followed by introduction of 0.15 mL of 5% NaNO3. After 5 mins of incubation at room temperature, 0.15 mL of 10% AlCl3 was added and left for 1 min before subsequently adding 1 mL of 1M NaOH. The absorbance was measured at 510 nm against a blank made of all the components of the assay minus sample, using Evolution™ Pro UV-Vis Spectrophotometer (Thermo-Fisher Scientific, Maddison, WI, USA). Authentic standard quercetin (QE) (20-250 μg/mL) was also analyzed by the UV-Vis Spectrophotometer to generate a calibration curve for external quantification of the TFC, expressed in mg of QE equivalent per 100 g.
Total phenols content (TPC)
The TPC was measured in consonance with methods previously described by Mokaya et al. (2022). For each sample, 50 mg of the larvae powder were weighed and dissolved in 50% methanol, vortexed briefly and centrifuged for 10 mins at 4,200 rpm. Upon centrifugation, 500 μL of the supernatant was picked and mixed with 2.5 mL of 0.2 N Folin-Ciocalteu then left to stand for 5 mins at room temperature. After incubation, 2 mL of a 75 g/L Na2CO3 solution was added and left to stand for 2 hours. The absorbance was read at 760 nm using Evolution™ Pro UV-Vis Spectrophotometer (Thermo-Scientific, Maddison, WI, USA) against a blank made with all other reagents without the sample. Authentic standard gallic acid (GA) (20-250 μg/mL) was also analyzed by the UV-Vis Spectrophotometer to generate a calibration curve for external quantification of the TPC, expressed in mg of QA equivalent per 100 g.
Radical scavenging activity
Amino acids determination
The amino acid profile of the beetle larvae was determined according to previous methods reported by Murugu et al. (2021). Ground larvae (100 mg each) were hydrolyzed with 2 mL of 6 N HCl at 110 °C for 24 hours under nitrogen gas. Afterwards, the hydrolysates were concentrated in vacuo and the residues reconstituted in 1 mL of 0.01% formic acid/acetonitrile 95%. These mixtures were then vortexed for 30 secs, sonicated for 30 mins and finally centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 15 mins. The supernatant was analyzed on an Agilent single quadrupole LC-MS 1200 series (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA). The chromatographic separation was achieved using a Zorbax RX-C18, 4.6 × 250 mm, 5 μm column, operated at 40 °C. The mobile phase comprised of water (A) and acetonitrile (B) all supplemented with +0.01% formic acid. The gradient elution adopted was as follows: 0-6 min, 10% B; 6-7.5 min, 10-80% B; 7.5-10.5 min, 80% B; 10.5-13 min, 80-100% B; 13-18 min, 100% B; 18-20 min, 100-10% B; 20-25 min, 10% B. The flow rate was programmed as follows: 0-13 min; 0.25 mL/min, 13-25; 0.5 mL/min and the injection volume was 5 μL. The mass spectrometer was operated on API-positive mode at a mass range of m/z 50-600 at 70 eV cone voltage. An authentic standard of amino acids (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was also analysed by LC-MS and used to externally quantify the amino acids. All the analyses were performed in triplicates.
Fatty acids determination
Minerals determination
The mineral composition was determined according to the protocol previously described by Tanga et al. (2023). Briefly, the samples were processed by dry ashing in muffle furnace (Heraeus-Kundendienst, Düsseldorf, Germany) at 550 °C for 3 hours. Upon cooling, 5 mL of 6 N HNO3 acid was added to 1 g of each sample and subjected to microwave-assisted digestion for 20 mins. The hydrolysates were tested for calcium, magnesium, iron, sodium, manganese, zinc and potassium using inductively coupled plasma emission mass spectrometer (Agilent 7900 ICP-MS, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA).
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were achieved using R Core Team (2017). The Shapiro-Wilk test was employed to establish the suitability of data sets for subsequent analyses. Data sets from any of the assays that violated the Shapiro Wilks test hypothesis of normal distribution were subjected to Kruskal-Wallis’s test and means compared using Dunns’ test using Agricole package (De Mendiburu and Simon, 2015). Conversely, data-sets that were normally distributed were subjected to one-way ANOVA and mean separated using Student-Newman-Keuls (SNK) test with the aid of Fisheries Stock Assessment (FSA) (Ogle and Ogle, 2017) and Agricole packages (De Mendiburu and Simon, 2015). All the assays were performed in triplicates.
3 Results
Morphological identification, molecular identification and phylogenetic analysis of the collected larvae
The larvae of both edible dung beetle species were creamy-white in colour, with a soft grub-like body. Their soft skin was covered in many setae (hair-like structures that perform sensory functions). They possessed three bodily parts: the head, the thorax and an enlarged dark abdomen housing the hindgut. They also featured three pairs of short functioning legs on the thoracic segment and large mandibles designed to devour decaying organic materials. Cetonia aurata larvae measured 55-60 mm long, 35-40 mm in diameter and had a brown head capsule that was 5.2-6.0 mm wide. On the other hand, O. rhinoceros larvae measured 85-96 mm in length, 45-50 mm in diameter, and had a brown head capsule that was 10.7-11.1 mm broad.
The BLAST analyses of the sequences of the two beetle larvae revealed 97% and 96.30% match with C. aurata and O. rhinoceros, respectively (Figure 3). These sequences obtained from C. aurata and O. rhinoceros have been deposited in the GenBank nr database under the accession numbers OQ925397.1 and OR115609.1, respectively.
(A) Maximum likelihood phylogenetic trees of cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 (COI) gene sequences from O. rhinoceros larvae, and (B) 28s rRNA sequences from C. aurata beetle larvae. Sequences of O. rhinoceros and C. aurata in this study is indicated in bold. Bootstrap values are of percentage agreement among 1000 bootstrap replicates. Substitutions per site are indicated by branch length. The outgroup sequence at the bottom of each tree was used for rooting.
Citation: Journal of Insects as Food and Feed 11, 2 (2025) ; 10.1163/23524588-00001009
Radical scavenging activities
The radical scavenging activities (RSA) of methanolic extracts of C. aurata larvae ranged between 91.1-92.7%, while that of O. rhinoceros ranged between 55-60% (Figure 4A). The RSA of O. rhinoceros was significantly (
Box plots showing variations in radical scavenging activity (RSA); (A) in 50% methanol, (B) hexane and bio functional compounds; (C) total flavonoids and D-total phenols content; FB represents C. aurata larvae while DB is O. rhinoceros larvae. The last letter at end of FB or DB represents the site of collection. C. aurata from Nairobi (FBN), Murang’a (FBM), Embu (FBE), O. rhinoceros from Nairobi (DBN), Murang’a (DBM) and Embu (DBE). Boxplots with different letters on top are significantly different at
Citation: Journal of Insects as Food and Feed 11, 2 (2025) ; 10.1163/23524588-00001009
The antioxidant activities and entomochemical contents of beetle larvae in three different counties
Citation: Journal of Insects as Food and Feed 11, 2 (2025) ; 10.1163/23524588-00001009
Total flavonoids content and total phenols content
The total flavonoids content (TFC) values for C. aurata ranged between 17.78-34.90 mg QE/100 g, while that for O. rhinoceros ranged between 28.64-35.02 mg QE/100 g (Figure 4C). The total phenols content (TPC) of O. rhinoceros and C. aurata ranged between 44.10-50.82 and 50.19-54.60 mg GAE/100 g, respectively (Figure 4D). There was no influence of TPC and TFC across the species and target location (Table 1).
Proximate composition
The proximate components of the two beetle larvae species from the three collection sites are presented in Table 2. The ash, crude fiber and crude protein content of the larvae varied significantly across the sampled locations and species type. Cetonia aurata from Murang’a and Nairobi recorded significantly higher protein levels than O. rhinoceros in Murang’a and Embu. The fiber content of O. rhinoceros in Murang’a and Embu was significantly higher, while the ash content of C. aurata (8.35%) was higher in Embu only.
Proximate composition (expressed in % of DM) of the two larvae collected from Murang’a, Embu and Nairobi counties
Citation: Journal of Insects as Food and Feed 11, 2 (2025) ; 10.1163/23524588-00001009
Amino acids profile
Eight essential amino acids (EAA) and four non-essential amino acids (NEAA) were detected from C. aurata and O. rhinoceros (Table 3). Methionine and lysine varied significantly between the species except across locations. Glutamic acid, isoleucine, leucine, tyrosine and phenylalanine were the most abundant amino acids in the two beetle larvae species (Figure 5). The green colour in Figure 5 that the concentrations of the amino acids were comparable in the two larvae species. The concentration of histidine was lowest in the samples from the target locations (Table 3).
Amino acid profile (mg/g) of C. aurata and O. rhinoceros sampled from three counties; Embu, Murang’a and Nairobi
Citation: Journal of Insects as Food and Feed 11, 2 (2025) ; 10.1163/23524588-00001009
Fatty acids profile
A total of 19 fatty acids were identified with 6 monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA), 5 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) and 8 saturated fatty acids (SFA) (Table 4). Stearic acid, margaric and palmitic acids of the SFAs, oleic acid and palmitoleic acid of the MUFAs and arachidonic and linoleic acids of the PUFAs were the most abundant fatty acids detected. Linoleic and arachidonic acids (PUFAs) were not detected from larvae sampled from Murang’a. The ω-6/ω-3 ratio was 3.44 and 6.64 for C. aurata and O. rhinoceros from Embu, respectively. Comparative total fatty acid values of C. aurata and O. rhinoceros to that of other animal-based sources and veal are shown in Figure 6.
Mineral composition
A total of eight minerals were detected from the two beetle larvae collected from the three sites (Table 5). Apart from zinc, the concentrations of all minerals varied significantly (
4 Discussion
The morphological characteristics of the larvae were comparable to those described in literature (Bedford, 1974; CABI, 2023). The two major species identified included C. aurata and O. rhinoceros, which is consistent to that reported by Mckenna et al. (2015) and Marshall et al. (2017) in USA and Australia, respectively. This study unravels that the entomochemical compounds (flavonoids and phenols) of these beetle species, are known to be responsible for the prominent radical scavenging activities (Lange and Nakamura, 2021). The total phenols contents recorded in two beetle species superseded 38.3 mg GAE/100 g and 3.65 mg/100 g reported in other beetle species (Rhynchophorus phoenicis and Oryctes owariensis, respectively). However, the phenol levels are lower than the values (541 mg GAE/100 g) reported in silk moth (Samia cynthia ricini) and in flower beetle; Protaetia brevitarsis Lewis 73.53 mg GA g−1 extract (Botella-Martı́nez et al., 2021; Mokaya et al., 2022; Suh and Kang, 2012; Ukoroije and Bobmanuel, 2019b). The TFC levels in C. aurata and O. rhinoceros were comparably lower than 93-231 mg/g range previously reported in the wild silk moths: Anaphe panda, Gonometa postica and Argema mimosae (Mokaya et al., 2022). The differences in the chemical composition described among the insect species can be attributed to the bioactive component levels present in the dietary sources, which explains why insects foraging exclusively on vegetarian diets have higher bioaccumulants than the organic waste feeders (Di Mattia et al., 2019). The polyphenolic compounds identified in the two scarab beetles have been previously been reported to counteract age-related illnesses such as Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease and others affecting the locomotor system (Del Carmen Villegas-Aguilar et al., 2023) through their radical scavenging potentials.
Heatmap showing concentrations of amino acids in C. aurata and O. rhinoceros. Dark-brown colour shows the highest concentration while orange and red colour represents the lowest concentration. The samples had comparable amounts since green colour was the most prevalent colour. The acronym FB represents C. aurata larvae while DB is O. rhinoceros larvae. The last letter at end of FB or DB represents the site of collection. The larvae of C. aurata from Nairobi (FBN), Murang’a (FBM), Embu (FBE), O. rhinoceros from Nairobi (DBN), Murang’a (DBM) and Embu (DBE).
Citation: Journal of Insects as Food and Feed 11, 2 (2025) ; 10.1163/23524588-00001009
The larvae of C. aurata larvae exhibited high RSA activities, which could be due to the presence of high bioactive peptides, particularly with lysine (L) in their sequences which has been found to have high antioxidant activity as identified from GWLK peptide obtained from Zizyphus jujuba derived protein hydrolysates (Memarpoor-Yazdi et al., 2013; Lange and Nakamura, 2021). Other reports have also shown that proteins might contribute significantly to the RSA (Mokaya et al., 2022; Suh et al., 2011). The RSA from C. aurata larvae are comparable to that reported for Protaetia brevitarsis (92%) and Allomyrina dichotoma (81.5%), respectively), but slightly lower than that reported by Suh et al. (2010, 2011). The similarity of RSA in the hexane extracts from C. aurata and O. rhinoceros signifies equal solubility of the compounds present (Di Mattia et al., 2019). Nevertheless, the RSA of hexane from C. aurata and O. rhinoceros was higher than the 7.8% activity previously reported in Allomyrina dichotoma (Suh et al., 2010), but similar to values reported by Mokaya et al. (2022). The outstanding bioactive components and RSA identified in this study have significant health implications. Therefore, the consumption of C. aurata and O. rhinoceros should be widely promoted as alternative food sources with reduced ecological impact (Fiebelkorn et al., 2020).
Fatty acid composition (in mg/g of DM) of beetle larvae obtained from Embu, Murang’a and Nairobi counties
Citation: Journal of Insects as Food and Feed 11, 2 (2025) ; 10.1163/23524588-00001009
(Continued)
Citation: Journal of Insects as Food and Feed 11, 2 (2025) ; 10.1163/23524588-00001009
Bar chart showing comparative values of fatty acids found in beetle larvae (C. aurata and O. rhinoceros) to that of other animal and plant based sources (on a dry matter basis, or DM). Source: FAO/GoK (Ghosh et al., 2017). FB represents C. aurata larvae while DB is O. rhinoceros larvae. The last letter at end of FB or DB represents the site collected. The larvae of C. aurata from Murang’a (FBM), Embu (FBE), Nairobi (FBN) and O. rhinoceros from Embu (DBE). SFA = saturated fatty acids, PUFA = polyunsaturated fatty acids, MUFA = Monounsaturated fatty acids.
Citation: Journal of Insects as Food and Feed 11, 2 (2025) ; 10.1163/23524588-00001009
Mineral composition (in mg/g of DM) of C. aurata and O. rhinoceros
Citation: Journal of Insects as Food and Feed 11, 2 (2025) ; 10.1163/23524588-00001009
Food susceptibility to microbial spoilage is determined by its moisture content with lower levels known to correspond to longer shelf-life (Banjo et al., 2006). The two larvae of C. aurata and O. rhinoceros investigated had similar moisture content, which were inconsistent to that reported on longhorn beetle (Analeptes trifasciata) and Oryctes boas (rhinoceros beetle) air-dried at 50 °C for 2 days (Yang et al., 2014). The ash content mirrors the micronutrients levels in the insect biomass and the value reported in this study are similar to that reported for most insects (Verkerk et al., 2007). Fiber content in edible insects is chiefly comprised of the chitinous exoskeleton (Ozimek et al., 1985; Hu et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2000) and may vary depending on the species and the physiological needs. The fiber content of O. rhinoceros and C. aurata varied across the species and collection sites. The fiber content recorded for C. aurata and O. rhinoceros differed from that of H. parallela (Yang et al., 2014) and Rhynchophorus phoenicis f. (Omotoso and Adedire, 2007). The results for crude protein reported in this study falls within the protein range (21-70 g/100 g of DM) estimated for many coleopteran beetles (Bukkens, 1997; Hu et al., 2010; Verkerk et al., 2007). Crude protein analysis was based on Kp of 4.76 to avoid overestimation from non-protein sources while using Kp of 6.25 (Janssen et al., 2017). Considerable variation of crude protein in insects across different locations have previously been reported by several authors (Hu et al., 2010) particularly for H. parallela. These large variations in protein content between the two larvae might be due to differences in growth conditions, and the differences in diet (organic waste) conversion efficiency to appreciable proportion of protein content (da Silva Lucas et al., 2020; Thomas, 2018). Interestingly, the protein content of C. aurata and O. rhinoceros larvae compared favourably with 40-75 g/100 g of DM to conventional protein sources such as beef, fish, soya bean and pork thereby valorising the larvae of these beetle species as nutritious diets with potential to significantly contribute to over 85% of protein RDA. The larvae pose as a sustainable protein source with health benefits to young babies, elderly, pregnant and lactating women with malnourished conditions.
The characterization of amino acids profiles of novel food sources such as insects is paramount for making nutritionally informed decisions akin to combating malnutrition. The unravelling of isoleucine, phenylalanine, valine and lysine as the predominating essential amino acids in the two larvae corroborates findings by earlier studies on O. rhinoceros larvae (Okaraonye and Ikewuchi, 2008) and H. parallela (Hu et al., 2010). These amino acids (isoleucine, phenylalanine and valine) comprise a list of hydrophobic amino acids which offer bioactive remedial cushions against some health risks (Atowa et al., 2021). Lysine is a precious amino acid with deficient levels widely documented in cereal and plant-based products (Hu et al., 2010). Its detection in appreciable levels indicates that C. aurata and O. rhinoceros larvae are nutritional resources that can be utilized to enrich commonly consumed plant-based food products with imbalanced nutrient profiles. Lysine is precursor in the synthesis of carnitine, which is instrumental in fat metabolism and also plays an important role in the production of hormones, antibodies and enzymes. Sulphur-containing amino acids thio-ether linkages such as methionine was the only detected sulphur containing amino acid from C. aurata and O. rhinoceros larvae. Methionine are actively involved in the detoxification mechanisms and production of other metabolically important compounds such as choline (Ademola et al., 2017; Fogang Mba et al., 2017). The detection of glutamic acid as the most abundant non-essential amino acids concords to findings reported in other Coleopteran beetles (Oriolowo et al., 2020; Hu et al., 2010). Glutamic acid is an important savory amino acid, whose deficiency in food leads to glutamate formiminotransferase disorder. Based on the amino acids’ profiles of the two beetle species larvae, it is admissible that such novel insects can be part of dietary diversification aimed at supplementing conventional low quality plant diets to alleviate malnutrition.
The ratio of total fatty acids, SFA: MUFA: PUFA mirrors the patterns previously reported in Protaetia brevitarsis larvae (Yeo et al., 2013) and O. rhinoceros larvae (Okaraonye and Ikewuchi, 2008). Further, the detection of stearic and palmitic acids of the SFA, palmitoleic and oleic acids of the MUFAs as the abundant fatty acids ratifies similar findings from previous reports on edible beetles; Apomecyna parumpunctata, O. monoceros, O. boas (Thomas and Kiin-Kabari, 2022). Oleic acid is a common MUFA in living systems and is known to counteract risks of cancer, heart attack, atherosclerosis and dementia (Yeo et al., 2013). Stearic and palmitic acids are important ingredients in the food industry for texture and tenderness modification of products. Higher palmitic acid levels, especially in C. aurata from Nairobi, portends high atherogenicity due to their propensity to increase low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (Womeni et al., 2009). Despite the negative health perceptions associated with saturated fatty acids, their coexistence with unsaturated fatty acids is paramount for a synchronous complementary functionality (Akpossan et al., 2015). The threshold ratio of omega-6/omega-3 fatty acids (ω-6/ω-3 ratio) were recorded for C. aurata and O. rhinoceros, which implies that the larvae could be considered as targets of optimal health benefits (Fogang Mba et al., 2017). However, these ratios were dependent on the detectable fatty acids from each larval species sampled from the three sites. Similar results have been reported from edible adult dung beetles like Onthophagus seniculus, Copris nevinsoni, and Liatongus rhadamitus (Bophimai and Siri, 2010). Variations in the fat content of edible insects are dependent on many factors including dietary sources, species, location, temperature and intra-tissue differences within an organism (Jantzen da Silva Lucas et al., 2020; Manditsera et al., 2019; Thomas and Kiin-Kabari, 2022).
Edible insects are reportedly credible sources of micro-nutrients (FAO and WHO, 2001; Van Huis et al., 2021). The minerals found in this study had been previously detected from Oryctes Owariensis, H. parallela and Rhynchophorus phoenicis f. (Omotoso and Adedire, 2007; Ukoroije and Bobmanuel, 2019a; Yang et al., 2014). The variabilities in the concentration of individual minerals detected from the larvae species may be as result of dietary sources, age and ecotype (Atowa et al., 2021; Paiko et al., 2014). Many studies have reported low calcium content of edible insects while alluding to their lack of mineralized skeleton (Kim et al., 2019), however, in this study, calcium was an abundant mineral. The high calcium content maybe attributed to their detritus nature of devouring decaying organic matter and in the process, may sequestrate calcium from the soil (Banjo et al., 2006). Abundance of calcium over other minerals has also been reported from larvae of long-horned beetle, Apomecyna parumpunctata Chev. (Thomas, 2018). In fact, the levels of calcium, iron and zinc found in this study supersedes the levels of 4.5, 1.8 and 4.6 mg/100 g, respectively, reported by Williams (2007) in beef. Owing to their cheap and sustainable accessibility, beetle larvae can be better sources of micro-nutrients than conventional sources of protein. The integration of larvae meal or powder or flour in food formulations would likely contributes to 68.88%, 50.5% and 18% of the RDA for iron, zinc and calcium, respectively. Hence, these larvae can be rich candidates for combating micro-nutrient deficiency common majority of the modern populace, especially children. Iron and zinc deficiencies are the leading causes of anemia and cognitive disorders in under five years old children. These cases are rampant in areas associated with over-reliance on cereals as staple food and minimal intake of animal products (Roohani et al., 2013). Integrating sustainable protein sources such as the beetle larvae reported herein into cereal based staple products may be a great step towards alleviation of micro-nutrient related disorders among the undernourished population.
5 Conclusion
Here, it is experimentally concluded that the larvae of the two beetle species have the potential to serve as nutritious food and therapeutic source. The properties are owed to their high protein content, considerable levels of essential micro-nutrient (zinc, iron and calcium) as well as their entomochemical profiles. The larvae of C. aurata and O. rhinoceros could therefore substantially contribute to the daily protein requirements for adults and children, aiding in the maintenance and growth of bones, respectively. Further, the presence of phenolic compounds would boosts the capacity to prevent oxidation of body molecules like lipids thereby fostering good health. Unlike the geographical location of the beetle species, the species type had a huge influence on the bio-functional composition of the larvae except for fatty acid value which might have been largely affected by diet and habitat. Further studies are required on protein digestibility, vitamin profile, potential allergenicity and safety aspects of the beetle species. Given the seasonality of occurrence of wild beetle species and limited supply and availability exploration of large-scale commercial rearing of the larvae, processing techniques and shelf-life research would be crucial to extend the nutritional advantages they confer to other communities across low and middle-income countries (LMIC). Furthermore, the detritivorous nature of the beetle would impact positively to the environment by reducing greenhouse gas emissions and waste management.
Corresponding author; e-mail: ctanga@icipe.org
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank Jackton Ooko Ongere, Shem Ondiaka, Kabii James, Dennis Getange and Onesmus Wanyama for their substantial contribution in providing technical support during data collection. The first author, Sylviah S. Mwanza, also acknowledges the financially support accorded to the her through the Embu University, Kenya in form of a master’s scholarship.
Author contributions
Conceptualization, methodology, resources, project administration: S.S.M, C.M.M., N.M.K. and C.M.T.; software, investigation, supervision, funding acquisition: C.M.M. and C.M.T.; validation: S.S.M., C.M.M., H.O.M, J.M. and C.M.T.; formal analysis, data curation, visualization: S.S.M. H.O.M., B.O.O. and C.M.M.; writing – original draft preparation: S.S.M., writing – review and editing: S.S.M., C.M.M., H.O.M., B.O.O., N.M.K., J.M., and C.M.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Data availability
The 28s and COI sequences obtained for the larvae are available in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under accession numbers OQ925397.1 and OR115609.1.
Funding
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support for this research by the following organizations and agencies: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) (ProteinAfrica – Grant No: LS/2020/154), Novo Nordisk Foundation (RefIPro:NNF22SA0078466), the Rockefeller Foundation (WAVE-IN – Grant No: 2021 FOD 030); Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (INV-032416); European Commission (HORIZON 101060762 NESTLER and HORIZON 101136739 INNOECOFOOD), the Curt Bergfors Foundation Food Planet Prize Award; Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation, the Section for Research, Innovation, and Higher Education grant number RAF-3058 KEN-18/0005 (CAP-Africa), the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida); the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC); the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR); the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (Norad); the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ); and the Government of the Republic of Kenya. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the donors.
Institutional review board statement
The authority to conduct the experiment and collect data was in accordance with the animal welfare regulations and granted by National Commission for Science, Technology, and Innovation (NACOSTI); Research Permit License No: NACOSTI/P/23/27477. This research also received approval from the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization (KALRO)-Veterinary Science Research Institute (VSRI); Muguga North upon compliance with all provisions vetted under and coded: KALRO-VSRI/IACUC028/16032022.
References
Ademola, O.A., Omolara, A.H. and Olatoye, R.A., 2017. Amino acids profile of bee brood, soldier termite, snout beetle larva, silkworm larva and pupa: nutritional implications. Advances in Analytical Chemistry 7: 31-38. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.aac.20170702.02
Ajobiewe, J.O., Ajobiewe, H.F., Ajobiewe, C.D., Yashim, N.A., Oguji, C., Ogundeji, A.A., Sidi, I.I. and Omogah, P.O., 2021. Has locally consumed grasshopper in Abuja, Nigeria, any therapeutic value on arthritis disease, public health wise? Scholars Journal of Applied Medical Sciences 9: 1727-1735. https://doi.org/10.36347/sjams.2021.v09i11.016
Akinnawo, O. and Ketiku, A.O., 2000. Chemical composition and fatty acid profile of edible larva of Cirina forda (Westwood). African Journal of Biomedical Research 3: 93-96.
Akpossan, R., Digbeu, Y., Koffi, M., Kouadio, J., Dué, E. and Kouamé, P., 2015. Protein fractions and functional properties of dried Imbrasia oyemensis larvae full-fat and defatted flours. International Journal of Biochemistry Research & Review 5: 116-126. https://doi.org/10.9734/IJBCRR/2015/12178
Anaduaka, E.G., Uchendu, N.O., Osuji, D.O., Ene, L.N. and Amoke, O.P., 2021. Nutritional compositions of two edible insects: Oryctes rhinoceros larva and Zonocerus variegatus. Heliyon 7: e06531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06531
Atowa, C.O., Okoro, B.C., Umego, E.C., Atowa, A.O., Emmanuel, O., Ude, V.C. and Ugbogu, E.A., 2021. Nutritional values of Zonocerus variegatus, Macrotermes bellicosus and Cirina forda insects: mineral composition, fatty acids and amino acid profiles. Scientific African 12: e00798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2021.e00798
Banjo, A.D., Lawal, O.A. and Songonuga, E.A., 2006. The nutritional value of fourteen species of edible insects in southwestern Nigeria. African Journal of Biotechnology 5: 298-301.
Bedford, G.O., 1974. Descriptions of the larvae of some rhinoceros beetles (Col., Scarabaeidae, Dynastinae) associated with coconut palms in New Guinea. Bulletin of Entomological Research 63: 445-472.
Béné, C., Bakker, D., Chavarro, M.J., Even, B., Melo, J. and Sonneveld, A., 2021. Global assessment of the impacts of COVID-19 on food security. Global Food Security 31: 100575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100575
Bongaarts, J., 2009. Human population growth and the demographic transition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 364: 2985-2990. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0137
Bophimai, P. and Siri, S., 2010. Fatty acid composition of some edible dung beetles in Thailand. International Food Research Journal 17: 1025-1030.
Botella-Martı́nez, C., Lucas-González, R., Pérez-Álvarez, J.A., Fernández-López, J. and Viuda-Martos, M., 2021. Assessment of chemical composition and antioxidant properties of defatted flours obtained from several edible insects. Food Science and Technology International 27: 383-391. https://doi.org/10.1177/1082013220958854
Bukkens, S.G.F., 1997. The nutritional value of edible insects. Ecology of Food and Nutrition 36: 287-319. https://doi.org/10.1080/03670244.1997.9991521
CABI, 2023. Cetonia aurata (flower, beetle). In: CABI Compendium. CABI Compendium, Boston, MA, USA. https://doi.org/10.1079/cabicompendium.16834
Da Silva Lucas, A.J., de Oliveira, L.M., Da Rocha, M. and Prentice, C., 2020. Edible insects: an alternative of nutritional, functional and bioactive compounds. Food Chemistry 311: 126022.
De Mendiburu, F. and Simon, R., 2015. Agricolae – Ten years of an open source statistical tool for experiments in breeding, agriculture and biology. PeerJ 3: 1-18.
Del Carmen Villegas-Aguilar, M., de la Luz Cádiz-Gurrea, M., Arráez-Román, D. and Segura-Carretero, A., 2023. Anti-aging effects of phenolic compounds. In: Koltover, V.K. (ed.) Anti-aging pharmacology. Academic Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, pp. 119-152.
Di Mattia, C., Battista, N., Sacchetti, G. and Serafini, M., 2019. Antioxidant activities in vitro of water and liposoluble extracts obtained by different species of edible insects and invertebrates. Frontiers in Nutrition 6: 106. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2019.00106
FAO and WHO, 2001. Human vitamin and mineral requirements. FAO, Rome, Italy. Available at: https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/586d9f81-08d2-4e44-a4f1-bb6d09514f02/content
Fiebelkorn, F., Puchert, N. and Dossey, A.T., 2020. An exercise on data-based decision making: comparing the sustainability of meat & edible insects. The American Biology Teacher 82: 522-528.
Fogang Mba, A.R., Kansci, G., Viau, M., Hafnaoui, N., Meynier, A., Demmano, G. and Genot, C., 2017. Lipid and amino acid profiles support the potential of Rhynchophorus phoenicis larvae for human nutrition. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 60: 64-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2017.03.016
Ghosh, S., Lee, S.-M., Jung, C. and Meyer-Rochow, V.B., 2017. Nutritional composition of five commercial edible insects in South Korea. Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology 20: 686-694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aspen.2017.04.003
Guindon, S., Dufayard, J.-F., Lefort, V., Anisimova, M., Hordijk, W. and Gascuel, O., 2010. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Systematic Biology 59: 307-321. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syq010
Helrich, K., 1990. Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA, USA.
Hu, Q., Yang, L.Y., Cui, F.J., Zhang, P.C., Li, Y. and Zhang, F.J., 2010. Analysis and evaluation of the nutritional components in Holitrichia parallela Motschulsky. Plant Diseases and Pests 1: 7-9.
Janssen, R.H., Vincken, J.-P., van den Broek, L.A.M., Fogliano, V. and Lakemond, C.M.M., 2017. Nitrogen-to-protein conversion factors for three edible insects: Tenebrio molitor, Alphitobius diaperinus, and Hermetia illucens. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 65: 2275-2278.
Jantzen da Silva Lucas, A., Menegon de Oliveira, L., da Rocha, M. and Prentice, C., 2020. Edible insects: an alternative of nutritional, functional and bioactive compounds. Food Chemistry 311: 126022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.126022
Kearse, M., Moir, R., Wilson, A., Stones-Havas, S., Cheung, M., Sturrock, S., Buxton, S., Cooper, A., Markowitz, S., Duran, C., Thierer, T., Ashton, B., Meintjes, P. and Drummond, A., 2012. Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28: 1647-1649. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199
Kim, T.-K., Yong, H.I., Kim, Y.-B., Kim, H.-W. and Choi, Y.-S., 2019. Edible insects as a protein source: a review of public perception, processing technology, and research trends. Food Science of Animal Resources 39: 521-540. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2019.e53
Lange, K.W. and Nakamura, Y., 2021. Edible insects as future food: chances and challenges. Journal of Future Foods 1: 38-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfutfo.2021.10.001
Laureati, M., Proserpio, C., Jucker, C., Savoldelli, S., Proserpio, C., Jucker, C. and Savoldelli, S., 2016. New sustainable protein sources: consumers’ willingness to adopt insects as feed and food. Italian Journal of Food Science 28: 652-668. https://doi.org/10.14674/1120-1770/ijfs.v476
Manditsera, F.A., Luning, P.A., Fogliano, V. and Lakemond, C.M.M., 2019. The contribution of wild harvested edible insects (Eulepida mashona and Henicus whellani) to nutrition security in Zimbabwe. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 75: 17-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2018.09.013
Marshall, S.D.G., Moore, A., Vaqalo, M., Noble, A. and Jackson, T.A., 2017. A new haplotype of the coconut rhinoceros beetle, Oryctes rhinoceros, has escaped biological control by Oryctes rhinoceros nudivirus and is invading Pacific Islands. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 149: 127-134.
McGuire, S., 2013. WHO, World Food Programme, and International Fund for Agricultural Development. 2012. The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2012. Economic growth is necessary but not sufficient to accelerate reduction of hunger and malnutrition. Rome, FAO. Advances in Nutrition 4: 126-127. https://doi.org/10.3945/an.112.003343
Mckenna, D.D., Farrell, B.D., Caterino, M.S., Farnum, C.W., Hawks, D.C., Maddison, D.R., Seago, A.E., Short, A.E.Z., Newton, A.F. and Thayer, M.K., 2015. Phylogeny and evolution of S taphyliniformia and S carabaeiformia: forest litter as a stepping stone for diversification of nonphytophagous beetles. Systematic Entomology 40: 35-60.
Memarpoor-Yazdi, M., Mahaki, H. and Zare-Zardini, H., 2013. Antioxidant activity of protein hydrolysates and purified peptides from Zizyphus jujuba fruits. Journal of Functional Foods 5: 62-70.
Mokaya, H.O., Ndunda, R.M., Kegode, T.M., Koech, S.J., Tanga, C.M., Subramanian, S. and Ngoka, B., 2022. Silkmoth pupae: potential and less exploited alternative source of nutrients and natural antioxidants. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed 9: 491-502. https://doi.org/10.3920/JIFF2022.0134
Mudalungu, C.M., Tanga, C.M., Kelemu, S. and Torto, B., 2021. An overview of antimicrobial compounds from African edible insects and their associated microbiota. Antibiotics 10: 621.
Murugu, D.K., Onyango, A.N., Ndiritu, A.K., Osuga, I.M., Xavier, C., Nakimbugwe, D. and Tanga, C.M., 2021. From farm to fork: crickets as alternative source of protein, mvinerals, and vitamins. Frontiers in Nutrition 8: 704002. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.704002
Ochieng, B.O., Anyango, J.O., Nduko, J.M., Cheseto, X., Mudalungu, C.M., Khamis, F.M., Ghemoh, C.J., Egonyu, P.J., Subramanian, S., Nakimbugwe, D., Ssepuuya, G. and Tanga, C.M., 2022. Dynamics in nutrients, sterols and total flavonoid content during processing of the edible long-horned grasshopper (Ruspolia differens Serville) for food. Food Chemistry 383: 132397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132397
Ogle, D. and Ogle, M.D., 2017. Package ‘FSA.’ Cran Repos. Available at: https://github.com/droglenc/FSA
Okaraonye, C.C. and Ikewuchi, J.C., 2008. Nutritional potential of Oryctes rhinoceros larva. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition 8: 35-38. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2009.35.38
Omotoso, O.T., 2018. The nutrient profile of the developmental stages of palm beetle, Oryctes rhinoceros L. British Journal of Environmental Sciences 6: 1-11. Available at: http://www.eajournals.org/wp-content/uploads/The-Nutrient-Profile-of-the-Developmental-Stages-of-Palm-Beetle-Oryctes-Rhinoceros-L.pdf
Omotoso, O.T. and Adedire, C.O., 2007. Nutrient composition, mineral content and the solubility of the proteins of palm weevil, Rhynchophorus phoenicis f. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Journal of Zhejiang University Science B 8: 318-322. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.2007.B0318
Oriolowo, O.B., John, O.J., Mohammed, U.B. and Joshua, D., 2020. Amino acids profile of catfish, crayfish and larva of edible dung beetle. Ife Journal of Science 22: 9-16. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijs.v22i1.2
Ozimek, L., Sauer, W.C., Kozikowski, V., Ryan, J.K., Jørgensen, H. and Jelen, P., 1985. Nutritive value of protein extracted from honey bees. Journal of Food Science 50: 1327-1329. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1985.tb10469.x
Paiko, Y.B., Jacob, J.O., Salihu, S.O., Dauda, B.E.N., Suleiman, M.A.T. and Akanya, H.O., 2014. Fatty acid and amino acid profile of emperor moth caterpillar (Cirina forda) in Paikoro Local Government Area of Niger State, Nigeria. American Journal of Biochemistry 4: 29-34.
R Core Team, 2017. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Available at: https://www.R-project.org/.
Roohani, N., Hurrell, R., Kelishadi, R. and Schulin, R., 2013. Zinc and its importance for human health: an integrative review. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences 18: 144-157. Available at: http://jrms.mui.ac.ir/index.php/jrms/article/view/8963/3821
Rumpold, B.A. and Schlüter, O.K., 2013. Potential and challenges of insects as an innovative source for food and feed production. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies 17: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2012.11.005
Sonnhammer, E.L.L. and Durbin, R., 1995. A dot-matrix program with dynamic threshold control suited for genomic DNA and protein sequence analysis. Gene 167: GC1-GC10. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1119(95)00714-8
Steenson, S. and Buttriss, J.L., 2020. The challenges of defining a healthy and ‘sustainable’ diet. Nutrition Bulletin 45: 206-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/nbu.12439
Suh, H.-J. and Kang, S.C., 2012. Antioxidant activity of aqueous methanol extracts of Protaetia brevitarsis Lewis (Coleoptera: Scarabaedia) at different growth stages. Natural Product Research 26: 510-517. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2010.530267
Suh, H.-J., Kim, S.-R., Hwang, J.-S., Kim, M.J. and Kim, I., 2011. Antioxidant activity of aqueous methanol extracts from the lucanid beetle, Serrognathus platymelus castanicolor Motschulsky (Coleoptera: Lucanidae). Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology 14: 95-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aspen.2010.10.002
Suh, H.-J., Kim, S.-R., Lee, K.-S., Park, S. and Kang, S.C., 2010. Antioxidant activity of various solvent extracts from Allomyrina dichotoma (Arthropoda: Insecta) larvae. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology 99: 67-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2010.02.005
Tanga, C.M., Mokaya, H.O., Kasiera, W. and Subramanian, S., 2023. Potential of insect life stages as functional ingredients for improved nutrition and health. Insects 14: 136. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14020136
Thomas, C.N., 2018. Nutritional potentials of edible larvae of longhorned beetle (Apomecyna parumpunctata Chev.) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in Niger Delta, Nigeria. International Journal of Agriculture and Earth Science 4: 46-51.
Thomas, C.N. and Kiin-Kabari, D.B., 2022. Comparative study on fatty acid profiles of selected edible insects and animals in Africa: a review. Journal of Biology and Genetic Research 8: 18-30.
Ukoroije, R.B. and Bobmanuel, R.B., 2019a. Biochemical constituents of larvae of the rhinoceros beetle Oryctes owariensis Beauvois (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in Bayelsa State. Cross Current International Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences 1: 106-111.
Ukoroije, R.B. and Bobmanuel, R.B., 2019b. The acceptability of Oryctes owariensis Beauvois (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) larva as food in Bayelsa State, Nigeria. East African Scholars Journal of Agriculture and Life Sciences 2: 509-515.
Van Huis, A., 2021. Cultural significance of beetles in sub-Saharan Africa. Insects 12: 368. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12040368
Van Huis, A., Rumpold, B., Maya, C. and Roos, N., 2021. Nutritional qualities and enhancement of edible insects. Annual Review of Nutrition 41: 551-576. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nutr-041520-010856
Van Huis, A., Van Itterbeeck, J., Klunder, H., Mertens, E., Halloran, A., Muir, G. and Vantomme, P., 2013. Edible insects: future prospects for food and feed security. FAO, Rome, Italy. Available at: https://www.fao.org/4/i3253e/i3253e.pdf
Verkerk, M.C., Tramper, J., van Trijp, J.C.M. and Martens, D.E., 2007. Insect cells for human food. Biotechnology Advances 25: 198-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2006.11.004
Williams, P., 2007. Nutritional composition of red meat. Nutrition & Dietetics 64: S113-S119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-0080.2007.00197.x
Wilson, J.J., 2012. DNA barcodes for insects. In: Kress, W. and Erickson, D. (eds.) DNA barcodes. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 858. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, USA, pp. 17-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-591-6_3
Womeni, H.M., Linder, M., Tiencheu, B., Mbiapo, F.T., Villeneuve, P., Fanni, J. and Parmentier, M., 2009. Oils of insects and larvae consumed in Africa: potential sources of polyunsaturated fatty acids. OCL – Oilseeds and Fats, Crops and Lipids 16: 230-235. https://doi.org/10.1051/ocl.2009.0279
Yang, Q., Liu, S., Sun, J., Yu, L., Zhang, C., Bi, J. and Yang, Z., 2014. Nutritional composition and protein quality of the edible beetle Holotrichia parallela. Journal of Insect Science 14: 139. https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/ieu001
Yeo, H., Youn, K., Kim, M., Yun, E.-Y., Hwang, J.-S., Jeong, W.-S. and Jun, M., 2013. Fatty acid composition and volatile constituents of Protaetia brevitarsis larvae. Preventive Nutrition and Food Science 18: 150-156. https://doi.org/10.3746/pnf.2013.18.2.150
Zhang, M., Haga, A., Sekiguchi, H. and Hirano, S., 2000. Structure of insect chitin isolated from beetle larva cuticle and silkworm (Bombyx mori) pupa exuvia. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 27: 99-105.