Consumer attitude and acceptance toward fish fed with insects: a focus on the new generations
In: Journal of Insects as Food and FeedSearch for other papers by L. Baldi in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by T. Mancuso in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by M. Peri in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by L. Gasco in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by M.T. Trentinaglia in
Current site
Google Scholar
Since global demand for aquaculture products is expected to increase dramatically in the near future, policymakers and companies are considering the adoption of insect-based feed, which is more economically viable and environmentally sustainable than fish or vegetable-based meals currently used. Nonetheless, fish farmed with insects are still perceived as innovative products by consumers, and further studies exploring these demand-side concerns must be conducted to make sure a market for such products exists. This study focuses on the factors that can favour the acceptance of farmed fish fed with insects of a sample of young Italians. In particular, within the theoretical framework adopted in this analysis, we let acceptance be expressed by different dimensions, each potentially influenced by individual factors, such as socio-economic characteristics, as the provision of information on the nutritional and environmental benefits of insect-based feed for aquaculture, and as consumer psychometric indicators. In this respect, we use the by-dimensional definition of environmental attitude proposed by environmental psychologists, that considers attitude toward environmental protection and toward nature. In this survey, we reached 482 consumers, aged less than 40, using social networks. A Factor Analysis was performed to identify the different dimensions of the acceptance process. We then applied the Rasch model on consumers’ reported behaviours toward environmental protection or nature to retrieve their environmental attitudes. We performed a Seemingly Unrelated Regression to assess the importance of socio-demographic, information, and psychometric variables on the different dimensions of acceptance. Results indicate that the use of psychometric variables to study the acceptability of an innovative food product seems particularly appropriate. In addition to the role of environmental attitude, acceptance is also explained by some socio-demographic variables, with men and younger consumers being more inclined to accept the product. Acceptance is also higher among informed respondents, confirming the importance of reducing information asymmetries.
-
Albertsen, L., Wiedmann, K.P. and Schmidt, S., 2020. The impact of innovation-related perception on consumer acceptance of food in food innovations – development of an integrated framework of the consumer acceptance process. Food Quality and Preference 84: 103958.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.103958
-
Altintzoglou, T., Verbeke, W., Vanhonacker, F. and Luten, J., 2010. The image of fish from aquaculture among Europeans: impact of exposure to balanced information. Journal of Aquatic Food Product Technology 19: 103-119.https://doi.org/10.1080/10498850.2010.492093
-
Ankamah-Yeboah, I., Jacobsen, J.B. and Olsen, S.R.B., 2018. Innovating out of the fishmeal trap: the role of insect-based fish feed in consumers’ preferences for fish attributes. British Food Journal 120(10): 2395-2410.https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-11-2017-0604
-
Baldi, L., Trentinaglia, M.T., Mancuso, T. and Peri, M., 2021. Attitude toward environmental protection and toward nature: how do they shape consumer behaviour for a sustainable tomato? Food Quality and Preference 90: 104175.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104175
-
Bazoche, P. and Poret, S., 2021. Acceptability of insects in animal feed: a survey of French consumers. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 20: 251-270.https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1845
-
Bollani, L., Bonadonna, A. and Peira, G., 2019. The millennials’ concept of sustainability in the food sector. Sustainability 11: 2984.https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102984
-
Bond, T.G. and Fox, C.M., 2007. Applying the Rasch model: fundamental measurement in the human sciences, 2nd edition. Psychology Press, New York, NY, USA, 360 pp.https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410614575
-
Bortoleto, A.P., 2014. Waste prevention policy and behaviour new approaches to reducing waste generation and its environmental impacts, 1st edition. Routledge, London, UK, 218 pp.https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315817941
-
Breusch, T.S. and Pagan, A.R., 1980. The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. Review of Economic Studies 47: 239-253.https://doi.org/10.2307/2297111
-
Brügger, A., Kaiser, F.G. and Roczen, N., 2011. One for all? European Psychologist 16: 324-333.https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000032
-
Byrka, K., Kaiser, F.G. and Olko, J., 2017. Understanding the acceptance of nature-preservation-related restrictions as the result of the compensatory effects of environmental attitude and behavioral costs. Environment and Behavior 49: 487-508.https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916516653638
-
Campbell, D.T., 1963. Social attitudes and other acquired behavioral dispositions. In: Koch, S. (ed.) Psychology: a study of a science. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, pp. 94-172.https://doi.org/10.1037/10590-003
-
Chaudhry, Q., Watkins, R. and Castle, L., 2010. Nanotechnologies in the food arena: new opportunities, new questions, new concerns. In: Chaudhry, Q., Castle, L. and Watkins, D.R. (eds.) Nanotechnologies in food, Royal society of chemistry, London, UK, pp. 1-17.https://doi.org/10.1039/9781847559883-00001
-
Dagevos, H., 2021. A literature review of consumer research on edible insects: recent evidence and new vistas from 2019 studies. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed 7: 249-259.https://doi.org/10.3920/JIFF2020.0052
-
De Houwer, J., Gawronski, B. and Barnes-Holmes, D., 2013. A functional-cognitive framework for attitude research. European Review of Social Psychology 24: 252-287.https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2014.892320
-
De Souza-Vilela, J., Andrew, N.R. and Ruhnke, I., 2019. Insect protein in animal nutrition. Animal Production Science 59: 2029-2036.https://doi.org/10.1071/AN19255
-
DeCoster, J., Iselin, A.M.R. and Gallucci, M., 2009. A conceptual and empirical examination of justifications for dichotomization. Psychological Methods 14: 349-366.https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016956
-
Dimock, M., 2019. Defining generations: where millennials end and generation Z begins. Pew Research Center, Washington, DC, USA. Available at:https://tinyurl.com/2p8wxedj
-
Domingues, C.H.D.F., Borges, J.A.R., Ruviaro, C.F., Gomes Freire Guidolin, D. and Rosa Mauad Carrijo, J., 2020. Understanding the factors influencing consumer willingness to accept the use of insects to feed poultry, cattle, pigs and fish in Brazil. PLoS ONE 15: e0224059.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224059
-
EU Agricultural Market Brief, 2019. Agriculture markets and prices. Available at:http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/markets-and-prices/index_en.htm
-
European Union (EU), 2017a. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/892 of 13 March 2017 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors. Official Journal of the European Union L 138: 57-91. Available at:http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/892/oj.
-
European Union (EU), 2017b. Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/893 of 24 May 2017 amending Annexes I and IV to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Annexes X, XIV and XV to Commission Regulation (EU) No 142/2011 as regards the provisions on processed animal protein. Official Journal of the European Union L 138: 92-116. Available at:http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/893/oj.
-
Fasanelli, R., Galli, I., Riverso, R. and Piscitelli, A., 2020. Social representations of insects as food: an explorative-comparative study among millennials and X-generation consumers. Insects 11: 656.https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11100656
-
Ferrer Llagostera, P., Kallas, Z., Reig, L. and Amores De Gea, D., 2019. Use of insect meal as a sustainable feeding alternative in aquaculture: current situation, Spanish consumers’ perceptions and willingness to pay. Journal of Cleaner Production 229: 10-21.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.012
-
Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), 2020. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2020. Sustainability in action. FAO, Rome, Italy.https://doi.org/10.4060/ca9229en
-
Fraley, R.C., Waller, N.G. and Brennan, K.A., 2000. An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78: 350.https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.350
-
Frewer, L., 2003. Societal issues and public attitudes towards genetically modified foods. Trends in Food Science & Technology 14: 319-332.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2244(03)00064-5
-
Gasco, L., Acuti, G., Bani, P., Dalle Zotte, A., Danieli, P.P., De Angelis, A., Fortina, R., Marino, R., Parisi, G., Piccolo, G., Pinotti, L., Prandini, A., Schiavone, A., Terova, G., Tulli, F. and Roncarati, A., 2020a. Insect and fish by-products as sustainable alternatives to conventional animal proteins in animal nutrition. Italian Journal of Animal Science 19: 360-372.https://do.org/10.1080/1828051X.2020.1743209
-
Gasco, L., Biancarosa, I. and Liland, N.S., 2020b. From waste to feed: a review of recent knowledge on insects as producers of protein and fat for animal feeds. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry 23: 67-79.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2020.03.003
-
Gasco, L., Biasato, I., Dabbou, S., Schiavone, A. and Gai, F., 2019. Animals fed insect-based diets: state-of-the-art on digestibility, performance and product quality. Animals 9: 170-201.https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9040170
-
Gasco, L., Finke, M. and Van Huis, A., 2018. Can diets containing insects promote animal health? Journal of Insects as Food and Feed 4: 1-4.https://doi.org/10.3920/jiff2018.x001
-
Gasco, L., Jozéfiak, A. and Henry, M., 2020c. Beyond the protein concept: health aspects of using edible insects on animals. Journal of Insect as Food and Feed 7 (5): 715-741.https://doi.org/10.3920/JIFF2020.0077
-
Giordano, C., Piras, S., Boschini, M. and Falasconi, L., 2018. Are questionnaires a reliable method to measure food waste? A pilot study on Italian households. British Food Journal 120: 2885-2897.https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-02-2018-0081
-
Giotis, T. and Drichoutis, A.C., 2021. Consumer acceptance and willingness to pay for direct and indirect entomophagy. Q Open 1(2): qoab015.https://doi.org/10.1093/qopen/qoab015
-
Gupta, N., Fischer, A.R. and Frewer, L.J., 2012. Socio-psychological determinants of public acceptance of technologies: a review. Public Understanding of Science 21: 782-795.https://doi/10.1177/0963662510392485
-
Henry, M., Gasco, L., Chatzifotis, S. and Piccolo, G., 2018a. Does dietary insect meal affect the fish immune system? The case of mealworm,Tenebrio molitor on European sea bass,Dicentrarchus labrax. Developmental and Comparative Immunology 81: 204-209.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dci.2017.12.002
-
Henry, M.A., Gai, F., Enes, P., Peréz-Jiménez, A. and Gasco, L., 2018b. Effect of partial dietary replacement of fishmeal by yellow mealworm (Tenebrio molitor) larvae meal on the innate immune response and intestinal antioxidant enzymes of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Fish and Shellfish Immunology 83: 308-313.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2018.09.040
-
Hobbs, J.E. and Plunkett, M.D., 2007. Genetically modified foods: consumer issues and the role of information asymmetry. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 47: 445.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7976.1999.tb00442.x
-
Hua, K., Cobcroft J.M., Cole, A., Condon, K., Jerry, D.R., Mangott, A., Praeger, C., Vucko, M.J., Zeng, C., Zenger, K. and Strugnell, J.M., 2019. The future of aquatic protein: implications for protein sources in aquaculture diets. One Earth 1: 316-329.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2019.10.018
-
International Platform of Insects for Food and Feed (IPIFF), 2019. The European insect sector today: challenges, opportunities and regulatory landscape. IPIFF vision paper on the future of the insect sector towards 2030. Available at:https://tinyurl.com/ypjvky4v
-
Kaiser, F.G. and Wilson, M., 2004. Goal-directed conservation behavior: the specific composition of a general performance. Personality and Individual Differences 36: 1531-1544.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2003.06.003
-
Kaiser, F.G. and Wilson, M., 2019. The Campbell paradigm as a behavior-predictive reinterpretation of the classical tripartite model of attitudes. European Psychologist 24: 359-374.https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000364
-
Kaiser, F.G., 1998. A general measure of ecological behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 28: 395-422.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01712.x
-
Kaiser, F.G., 2021. Climate change mitigation within the Campbell paradigm: doing the right thing for a reason and against all odds. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 42: 70-75.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.03.024
-
Kaiser, F.G., Byrka, K. and Hartig, T., 2010. Reviving Campbell’s paradigm for attitude research. Personality and Social Psychology Review 14: 351-367.https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310366452
-
Kaiser, F.G., Hartig, T., Brügger, A. and Duvier, C., 2013. Environmental protection and nature as distinct attitudinal objects: an application of the Campbell paradigm. Environment and Behavior 45: 369-398.https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916511422444
-
Kaiser, F.G., Henn, L. and Marschke, B., 2020. Financial rewards for long-term environmental protection. Journal of Environmental Psychology 68: 101411.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101411
-
Kher, S.V., De Jonge, J., Wentholt, M.T., Deliza, R., De Andrade, J.C., Cnossen, H.J., Luijckx, N.N.L. and Frewer, L.J., 2013. Consumer perceptions of risks of chemical and microbiological contaminants associated with food chains: a cross-national study. International Journal of Consumer Studies 37: 73-83.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2011.01054.x
-
Krogdahl, Å., Penn, M., Thorsen, J., Refstie, S. and Bakke, A.M., 2010. Important antinutrients in plant feedstuffs for aquaculture: an update on recent findings regarding responses in salmonids. Aquaculture Research 41: 333-344.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2009.02426.x
-
La Barbera, F., Verneau, F., Videbæk, P.N., Amato, M. and Grunert, K.G., 2020. A self-report measure of attitudes toward the eating of insects: construction and validation of the Entomophagy Attitude Questionnaire. Food Quality and Preference 79: 103757.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.103757
-
Laureati, M., Proserpio, C., Jucker, C. and Savoldelli, S., 2016. New sustainable protein sources: consumers’ willingness to adopt insects as feed and food. Italian Journal of Food Science 28: 652-668.https://doi.org/10.14674/1120-1770/ijfs.v476
-
Linacre, J.M., 2002. What do infit and outfit, mean square and standardized mean? Rasch Measurement Transactions. Available at:https://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt162f.htm
-
Linacre, J.M., 2010. When to stop removing items and persons in Rasch misfit analysis? Rasch Measurement Transactions. Available at:https://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt234g.htm
-
Lock, E.J., Biancarosa, I. and Gasco, L., 2018. Insects as raw materials in compound feed for aquaculture. In: Halloran, A., Flore, R., Vantomme, P. and Roos, N. (eds.) Edible insects in sustainable food systems. Springer International Publishing AG, Cham, Switzerland, pp. 263-276.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74011-9_16
-
Mancini, S., Sogari, G., Menozzi, D., Nuvoloni, R., Torracca, B., Moruzzo, R. and Paci, G., 2019. Factors predicting the intention of eating an insect-based product. Foods 8: 270.https://doi.org/10.3390/foods8070270
-
Mancuso, T., Baldi, L. and Gasco, L., 2016. An empirical study on consumer acceptance of farmed fish fed on insect meals: the Italian case. Aquaculture International 24: 1489-1507.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-016-0007-z
-
Mancuso, T., Pippinato, L., Gasco L., 2019. The European insects sector and its role in the provision of green proteins in feed supply. Quality– Access to Success 20: 374-381
'The European insects sector and its role in the provision of green proteins in feed supply ' () 20 Quality– Access to Success : 374 -381.
-
Martin, C. and Czellar, S., 2017. Where do biospheric values come from? A connectedness to nature perspective. Journal of Environmental Psychology 52: 56-68.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.04.009
-
Menozzi, D., Sogari, G., Mora, C., Gariglio, M., Gasco, L. and Schiavone, A., 2021. Insects as feed for farmed poultry: are Italian consumers ready to embrace this innovation? Insects 12: 435.https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12050435
-
Menozzi, D., Sogari, G., Veneziani, M., Simoni, E. and Mora, C., 2017. Eating novel foods: an application of the theory of planned behaviour to predict the consumption of an insect-based product. Food Quality and Preference 59: 27-34.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.02.001
-
Mol, A.P., 2015. Transparency and value chain sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production 107: 154-161.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.012
-
Onwezen, M.C., Van den Puttelaar, J., Verain, M.C.D. and Veldkamp, T., 2019. Consumer acceptance of insects as food and feed: the relevance of affective factors. Food Quality and Preference 77: 51-63.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.04.011
-
Parisi, G., Tulli, F., Fortina, R., Marino, R., Bani, P., Dalle Zotte, A., De Angeli, A., Piccolo, G., Pinotti, L., Schiavone, A., Terova, G., Prandini, A., Gasco, L., Roncarati, A. and Danieli, P.P., 2020. Protein hunger of the feed sector: the alternatives offered by the plant world. Italian Journal of Animal Science 19: 1204-1225.https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2020.1827993
-
Pieniak, Z., Vanhonacker, F. and Verbeke, W., 2013. Consumer knowledge and use of information about fish and aquaculture. Food Policy 40: 25-30.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.01.005
-
Popoff, M., MacLeod, M. and Leschen, W., 2017. Attitudes towards the use of insect-derived materials in Scottish salmon feeds. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed 3: 131-138.https://doi.org/10.3920/JIFF2016.0032
-
Rasch, G., 1993. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. MESA Press, Chicago, IL, USA.
'Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests', ().
-
Rogers, E.M., 2003. Diffusion of innovations. New York Free Press, New York, NY, USA, 551 pp.
'Diffusion of innovations ', () 551.
-
Ronteltap, A., Van Trijp, J.C.M., Renes, R.J. and Frewer, L.J., 2007. Consumer acceptance of technology-based food innovations: lessons for the future of nutrigenomics. Appetite 49: 1-17.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2007.02.002
-
Rosenberg, M. and Hovland, C.I., 1960. Research on communication and attitude coated. In: Triandis, H.C. (ed.) Attitude and attitude change. John Wiley Publisher, New York, NY, USA, 232 pp.
'Research on communication and attitude coated ', () 232.
-
Rumbos, C.I., Mente, E., Karapanagiotidis, I.T., Vlontzos, G. and Athanassiou, C.G., 2021. Insect-based feed ingredients for aquaculture: a case study for their acceptance in Greece. Insects 12: 586.https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12070586
-
Rummel, R.J., 1988. Applied factor analysis. Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL, USA, 617 pp.
'Applied factor analysis ', () 617.
-
Shepherd, C.J. and Jackson, A.J., 2013. Global fish meal and fish-oil supply: inputs, outputs and markets. Journal of Fish Biology 83: 1046-1066.https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.12224
-
Smetana, S., Schmitt, E. and Mathys, A., 2019. Sustainable use ofHermetia illucens insect biomass for feed and food: attributional and consequential life cycle assessment. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 144: 285-296.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.01.042
-
Smolders, K.C., De Kort, Y.A., Tenner, A.D. and Kaiser, F.G., 2012. Need for recovery in offices: behavior-based assessment. Journal of Environmental Psychology 32: 126-134.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.12.003
-
Sodano, V., Gorgitano, M.T., Verneau, F. and Vitale, C.D., 2016. Consumer acceptance of food nanotechnology in Italy. British Food Journal 118: 714-733.https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-06-2015-0226
-
Sogari, G., Amato, M., Biasato, I., Chiesa, S. and Gasco, L., 2019a. The potential role of insects as feed: a multi-perspective review. Animals 9: 119.https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9040119
-
Sogari, G., Bogueva, D. and Marinova, D., 2019c. Australian consumers’ response to insects as food. Agriculture 9: 108.https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9050108
-
Sogari, G., Menozzi, D. and Mora, C., 2019b. The food neophobia scale and young adults’ intention to eat insect products. International Journal of Consumer Studies 43: 68-76.https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12485
-
Sogari, G., Menozzi, D., Mora, C., Gariglio, M., Gasco, L. and Schiavone, A., 2022. How information affects consumers’ purchase intention and willingness to pay for poultry farmed with insect-based meal and live insects. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed.https://doi.org/10.3920/JIFF2021.0034
-
Sogari, G., Pucci, T., Aquilani, B. and Zanni, L., 2017. Millennial generation and environmental sustainability: the role of social media in the consumer purchasing behavior for wine. Sustainability 9: 1911.https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101911
-
Spartano, S. and Grasso, S., 2021. UK consumers’ willingness to try and pay for eggs from insect-fed hens. Future Foods 3: 100026.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fufo.2021.100026
-
Ssepuuya, G., Sebatta, C., Sikahwa, E., Fuuna, P., Sengendo, M., Mugisha, J., Fiaboe, K.K.M. and Nakimbugwe, D., 2019. Perception and awareness of insects as an alternative protein source among fish farmers and fish feed traders. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed 5: 107-116.https://doi.org/10.3920/JIFF2017.0056
-
Starke. A.D., Willemsen, M.C. and Snijders, C.C., 2020. Beyond ‘one-size-fits-all’ platforms: applying Campbell’s paradigm to test personalized energy advice in the Netherlands. Energy Research & Social Science 59: 101311.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101311
-
Thompson, S.C.G. and Barton, M.A., 1994. Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology 14: 149-157.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80168-9
-
Trentinaglia De Daverio, M.T., Mancuso, T., Peri, M. and Baldi, L., 2021. How does consumers’ care for origin shape their behavioural gap for environmentally friendly products? Sustainability 13: 190.https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010190
-
Van Huis, A. and Oonincx, D.G.A.B., 2017. The environmental sustainability of insects as food and feed. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 37: 43.https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-017-0452-8
-
Van Huis, A., 2020. Insects as food and feed, a new emerging agricultural sector: a review. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed 6: 27-44.https://doi.org/10.3920/JIFF2019.0017
-
Van Rijswijk, W. and Frewer, L.J., 2008. Consumer perceptions of food quality and safety and their relation to traceability. British Food Journal 110: 1034-1046.https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700810906642
-
Vermeir, I. and Verbeke, W., 2006. Sustainable food consumption: exploring the consumer ‘attitude-behavioral intention’ gap. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19: 169-194.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-005-5485-3
-
Yamoah, F.A. and Acquaye, A., 2019. Unravelling the attitude-behaviour gap paradox for sustainable food consumption: insight from the UK apple market. Journal of Cleaner Production 217: 172-184.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.094
-
Zellner, A., 1963. Estimators for seemingly unrelated regression equations: some exact finite sample results. Journal of the American Statistical Association 58: 977-992.https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1963.10480681
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Full Text Views | 195 | 142 | 12 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 213 | 183 | 18 |
Consumer attitude and acceptance toward fish fed with insects: a focus on the new generations
In: Journal of Insects as Food and FeedSearch for other papers by L. Baldi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by T. Mancuso in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M. Peri in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by L. Gasco in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M.T. Trentinaglia in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Since global demand for aquaculture products is expected to increase dramatically in the near future, policymakers and companies are considering the adoption of insect-based feed, which is more economically viable and environmentally sustainable than fish or vegetable-based meals currently used. Nonetheless, fish farmed with insects are still perceived as innovative products by consumers, and further studies exploring these demand-side concerns must be conducted to make sure a market for such products exists. This study focuses on the factors that can favour the acceptance of farmed fish fed with insects of a sample of young Italians. In particular, within the theoretical framework adopted in this analysis, we let acceptance be expressed by different dimensions, each potentially influenced by individual factors, such as socio-economic characteristics, as the provision of information on the nutritional and environmental benefits of insect-based feed for aquaculture, and as consumer psychometric indicators. In this respect, we use the by-dimensional definition of environmental attitude proposed by environmental psychologists, that considers attitude toward environmental protection and toward nature. In this survey, we reached 482 consumers, aged less than 40, using social networks. A Factor Analysis was performed to identify the different dimensions of the acceptance process. We then applied the Rasch model on consumers’ reported behaviours toward environmental protection or nature to retrieve their environmental attitudes. We performed a Seemingly Unrelated Regression to assess the importance of socio-demographic, information, and psychometric variables on the different dimensions of acceptance. Results indicate that the use of psychometric variables to study the acceptability of an innovative food product seems particularly appropriate. In addition to the role of environmental attitude, acceptance is also explained by some socio-demographic variables, with men and younger consumers being more inclined to accept the product. Acceptance is also higher among informed respondents, confirming the importance of reducing information asymmetries.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Full Text Views | 195 | 142 | 12 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 213 | 183 | 18 |