Barriers, risks and risk management strategies in European insect supply chains
In: Journal of Insects as Food and FeedSearch for other papers by H.H. Niyonsaba in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by J. Höhler in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by H.J. van der Fels-Klerx in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by T. Slijper in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by F. Alleweldt in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by S. Kara in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by R. Zanoli in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by A.I.A. Costa in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by M. Peters in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by M.P.M. Meuwissen in
Current site
Google Scholar
Despite technological developments and regulatory improvements, most actors in the insect sector still face many challenges and uncertainties. While previous research mainly focused on the perception of domain-specific challenges and risks or has been limited to specific stages in the supply chain, this study aims to determine how stakeholders perceive the importance of past barriers and future risks along European insect supply chains, and to identify the applied risk management strategies. Data were collected from stakeholders across four stages of the supply chain (rearers (n=23), processors (n=8), and insect derived feed (n=14), and food (n=12) producers) through an online survey. In total, 60 different barriers and risks, as well as 20 different risk management strategies, were evaluated. We find that stakeholders across all stages of the supply chain perceived ‘financial, cost and market’ barriers and risks as most important, specifically referring to the lack of financial investments and price and demand uncertainties. In addition, legal restrictions were perceived to constrain upscaling opportunities across all supply chain stages. Worker and food safety barriers were generally perceived as least important. The main risk management strategies across all stages of the supply chain related to investments in technologies enhancing stability of both the quality and the quantity of insects and derived products. Stakeholders were most optimistic about the future reduction of ‘operational’ and ‘financial, cost and market’ risks. To further stimulate upscaling of the sector, we recommend to enhance financing opportunities, and to improve authorisations for the use of different substrates and the production of a wider set of insect-based ingredients for feed and food products.
-
Ahsan, D.A. and Roth, E.V.A., 2010. Farmers’ perceived risks and risk management strategies in an emerging mussel aquaculture industry in Denmark. Marine Resource Economics 25(3): 309-323.https://doi.org/10.5950/0738-1360-25.3.309
-
Ali, I., Nagalingam, S. and Gurd, B., 2017. Building resilience in SMEs of perishable product supply chains: enablers, barriers and risks. Production Planning and Control 28(15): 1236-1250.https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2017.1362487
-
Araújo, R., Vázquez Calderón, F., Sánchez López, J., Azevedo, I.C., Bruhn, A., Fluch, S., Garcia Tasende, M., Ghaderiardakani, F., Ilmjärv, T. and Laurans M., 2021. Current status of the algae production industry in Europe: an emerging sector of the blue bioeconomy. Frontiers in Marine Science 7: 1247.https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.626389
-
Balling, M., Bernet, B., Gnan, E., Ayadi, R., Westerfeld, S., Franck, T., Huyghebaert, N., Gaspar, V., Bovha-Padilla, S. and Veugelers, R., 2009. Financing SMEs in Europe. SUERF, Vienna, Austria, pp 8-16.
-
Beesigamukama, D., Mochoge, B., Korir, N., Menale, K., Muriithi, B., Kidoido, M., Kirscht, H., Diiro, G., Ghemoh, C.J., Sevgan, S., Nakimbugwe, D., Musyoka, M.W., Ekesi, S. and Tanga, C.M., 2021. Economic and ecological values of frass fertilizer from black soldier fly agro-industrial waste processing. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed 8(3): 245-254.https://doi.org/10.3920/JIFF2021.0013
-
Bosma, N., Sanders, M. and Stam, E., 2018. Institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth in Europe. Small Business Economics 51(2): 483-499.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0012-x
-
Coltman, T., Devinney, T. M., Midgley, D.F. and Venaik, S., 2008. Formative versus reflective measurement models: Two applications of formative measurement. Journal of Business Research 61(12): 1250-1262.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.013
-
Derrien, C. and Boccuni, A., 2018. Current status of the insect producing industry in Europe. In: Halloran, A., Flore, R., Vantomme, P. and Roos, N. (eds) Edible insects in sustainable food systems. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, pp. 471-479.
-
Diamantopoulos, A. and Siguaw, J.A., 2006. Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: a comparison and empirical illustration. British Journal of Management 17(4): 263-282.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00500.x
-
Dobermann, D., Swift, J. and Field, L., 2017. Opportunities and hurdles of edible insects for food and feed. Nutrition Bulletin 42(4): 293-308.https://doi.org/10.1111/nbu.12291
-
Dvorsky, J., Belas, J., Gavurova, B. and Brabenec, T., 2021. Business risk management in the context of small and medium-sized enterprises. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja 34(1): 1690-1708.https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1844588
-
Enzing, C., Ploeg, M., Barbosa, M. and Sijtsma, L., 2014. Microalgaebased products for the food and feed sector: an outlook for Europe. Joint Research Centre’s Scientific and policy reports: 19-37. Available at:https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2791/3339
-
Falkner, E.M. and Hiebl, M.R.W., 2015. Risk management in SMEs: a systematic review of available evidence. Journal of Risk Finance 16(2): 122-144.https://doi.org/10.1108/JRF-06-2014-0079
-
Fernández, F.A., Sevilla, J.M.F. and Grima, E.M., 2019. Costs analysis of microalgae production. Chapter 21. In: Pandey, A., Chang, J.S., Soccol, C.R., Lee, D.J. and Chisti, Y. (eds) Biofuels from algae. Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, pp. 551-566.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-64192-2.00021-4
-
Gordon, L.A., Loeb, M.P. and Tseng, C.-Y., 2009. Enterprise risk management and firm performance: a contingency perspective. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 28(4): 301-327.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2009.06.006
-
Gren, M. and Tirkaso, W.T., 2021. Costs of mussel farming: a meta-regression analysis. Aquaculture 539: 736649.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.736649
-
Hardaker, J.B., Lien, G., Anderson, J.R. and Huirne, R.B., 2015. Coping with risk in agriculture: applied decision analysis. CABI, Wallingford, United Kingdom, 296 pp.
-
Hartmann, C. and Siegrist, M., 2017. Consumer perception and behaviour regarding sustainable protein consumption: A systematic review. Trends in Food Science and Technology 61: 11-25.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2016.12.006
-
Heckmann, L.H., Andersen, J., Eilenberg, J., Fynbo, J., Miklos, R., Jensen, A.N., Nørgaard, J. and Roos, N., 2019. A case report on inVALUABLE: insect value chain in a circular bioeconomy. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed 5(1): 9-13.https://doi.org/10.3920/JIFF2018.0009
-
Hudáková, M. and Masár, M., 2018. The assessment of key business risks for SMEs in Slovakia and their comparison with other EU countries. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review 6(4): 145-160.https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2018.060408
-
IPIFF, 2019. The European insect sector today: challenges, opportunities and the regulatory landscape. IPIFF, Brussels, Belgium. Available at:https://ipiff.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/2019IPIFF_VisionPaper_updated.pdf.
-
IPIFF, 2020a. The insect sector milestones towards sustainable food supply chains. IPIFF, Brussels, Belgium. Available at:https://ipiff.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/IPIFF-RegulatoryBrochureupdate07-2020-1.pdf.
-
IPIFF, 2020b. Vision paper on the future of the insect sector towards 2030. IPIFF, Brussels, Belgium. Brussels, Belgium. Available at:https://ipiff.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/2019IPIFF_VisionPaper_updated.pdf.
-
IPIFF, 2020c. Factsheet Edible insects market. IPIFF, Brussels, Belgium. Available at:https://ipiff.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/10-06-2020-IPIFF-edible-insects-market-factsheet.pdf.
-
Komarek, A.M., De Pinto, A. and Smith, V.H., 2020. A review of types of risks in agriculture: what we know and what we need to know. Agricultural Systems 178: 102738.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102738
-
Leonidou, L.C., 2004. An analysis of the barriers hindering small business export development. Journal of small Business Management 42(3): 279-302.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2004.00112.x
-
Marberg, A., Van Kranenburg, H. and Korzilius, H., 2017. The big bug: the legitimation of the edible insect sector in the Netherlands. Food Policy 71: 111-123.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.07.008
-
Meraner, M. and Finger, R., 2019. Risk perceptions, preferences and management strategies: evidence from a case study using German livestock farmers. Journal of Risk Research 22(1): 110-135.https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2017.1351476
-
Meuwissen, M.P.M., Huirne, R.B.M. and Hardaker, J.B., 2001. Risk and risk management: an empirical analysis of Dutch livestock farmers. Livestock Production Science 69(1): 43-53.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(00)00247-5
-
Meyer, A., Meijer, N., Hoek-van den Hil, H. and Van der Fels-Klerx, H., 2021. Chemical food safety hazards of insects reared for food and feed. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed 7(5): 823-831.https://doi.org/10.3920/JIFF2020.0085
-
Mitra, S., Karathanasopoulos, A., Sermpinis, G., Dunis, C. and Hood, J., 2015. Operational risk: emerging markets, sectors and measurement. European Journal of Operational Research 241(1): 122-132.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.08.021
-
Moro, A., Fink, M. and Maresch, D., 2015. Reduction in information asymmetry and credit access for small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Financial Research 38(1): 121-143.https://doi.org/10.1111/jfir.12054
-
Montanari, F., de Moura, A.P. and Cunha, L.M., 2021a. The global market of insects as food and feed. In: Montanari, F., de Moura, A.P. and Cunha, L.M. (eds) Production and commercialization of insects as food and feed. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, pp. 19-27.
-
Montanari, F., de Moura, A.P. and Cunha, L.M., 2021b. The EU regulatory framework for insects as food and feed and its current constraints. In: Montanari, F., de Moura, A.P. and Cunha, L.M. (eds) Production and commercialization of insects as food and feed. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, pp. 41-78.
-
Naranjo-Guevara, N., Fanter, M., Conconi, A.M. and Floto-Stammen, S., 2021. Consumer acceptance among Dutch and German students of insects in feed and food. Food Science and Nutrition 9(1): 414-428.https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.2006
-
Niyonsaba, H.H., Höhler, J., Kooistra, J., Van der Fels-Klerx, H.J. and Meuwissen, M.P.M., 2021. Profitability of insect farms. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed 7(5): 923-934.https://doi.org/10.3920/JIFF2020.0087
-
Ngo, H.M. and Moritaka, M., 2021. Consumer attitudes and acceptance of insects as food and feed: a review. Journal Faculty of Agriculture Kyushu University 66(2): 259-266.https://doi.org/10.15017/4486558
-
Onwezen, M.C., Bouwman, E.P., Reinders, M.J. and Dagevos, H., 2021. A systematic review on consumer acceptance of alternative proteins: pulses, algae, insects, plant-based meat alternatives, and cultured meat. Appetite 159: 105058.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2020.105058
-
Payne, C.L., Dobermann, D., Forkes, A., House, J., Josephs, J., McBride, A., Müller, A., Quilliam, R.S. and Soares, S., 2016. Insects as food and feed: European perspectives on recent research and future priorities. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed 2(4): 269-276.https://doi.org/10.3920/JIFF2016.0011
-
Pippinato, L., Gasco, L., Di Vita, G. and Mancuso, T., 2020. Current scenario in the European edible-insect industry: a preliminary study. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed 6(4): 371-381.https://doi.org/10.3920/JIFF2020.0008
-
Rabobank (2021). No longer crawling: Insect protein to come of age in the 2020s (Rabo Research Report). Available at:https://research.rabobank.com/far/en/sectors/animal-protein/insect-protein-tocome-of-age-in-the-2020s.html.
-
Rahman, M.T., Nielsen, R., Khan, M.A. and Ahsan, D., 2021. Perceived risk and risk management strategies in pond aquaculture. Marine Resource Economics 36(1): 43-69.https://doi.org/10.1086/711066
-
Ribeiro, J.C., Cunha, L.M., Sousa-Pinto, B. and Fonseca, J., 2018. Allergic risks of consuming edible insects: a systematic review. Molecular Nutrition and Food Research 62(1): 1700030.https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.201700030
-
Rizwan, M., Ping, Q., Saboor, A., Ahmed, U.I., Zhang, D., Deyi, Z. and Teng, L., 2020. Measuring rice farmers’ risk perceptions and attitude: evidence from Pakistan. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal 26(7): 1832-1847.https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2019.1602753
-
Rumin, J., Gonçalves de Oliveira Junior, R., Bérard, J.B. and Picot, L., 2021. Improving microalgae research and marketing in the European atlantic area: analysis of major gaps and barriers limiting sector development. Marine Drugs 19(6): 319.https://doi.org/10.3390/md19060319
-
Rumpold, B.A. and Schlüter, O.K., 2013. Potential and challenges of insects as an innovative source for food and feed production. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies 17: 1-11.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2012.11.005
-
Skotnicka, M., Karwowska, K., Kłobukowski, F., Borkowska, A. and Pieszko, M., 2021. Possibilities of the development of edible insect-based foods in Europe. Foods 10(4): 766.https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10040766
-
Slijper, T., De Mey, Y., Poortvliet, P.M. and Meuwissen, M.P.M., 2020. From risk behavior to perceived farm resilience: a Dutch case study. Ecology and Society 25(4): 10.https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11893-250410
-
Sogari, G., Amato, M., Biasato, I., Chiesa, S. and Gasco, L., 2019. The potential role of insects as feed: a multi-perspective review. Animals 9(4): 119.https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9040119
-
Spiegel, A., Slijper, T., de Mey, Y. and Meuwissen, M.P.M., 2021. Resilience capacities as perceived by European farmers. Agricultural Systems 193: 103224.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103224
-
Stull, V. and Patz, J., 2020. Research and policy priorities for edible insects. Sustainability Science 15(2): 633-645.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00709-5
-
Ulvenblad, P., Barth, H., Björklund, J.C., Hoveskog, M., Ulvenblad, P.O. and Ståhl, J., 2018. Barriers to business model innovation in the agrifood industry: a systematic literature review. Outlook on Agriculture 47(4): 308-314.https://doi.org/10.1177/0030727018811785
-
Vandeweyer, D., De Smet, J., Van Looveren, N. and Van Campenhout, L., 2021. Biological contaminants in insects as food and feed. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed 7(5): 807-822.https://doi.org/10.3920/JIFF2020.0060
-
Van Huis, A., 2017. Edible insects and research needs. Journal of insects as Food and Feed 3(1): 3-5.https://doi.org/10.3920/JIFF2017.x002
-
Van Huis, A., 2020. Insects as food and feed, a new emerging agricultural sector: a review. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed 6(1): 27-44.https://doi.org/10.3920/JIFF2019.0017
-
Van Huis, A., 2022. Edible insects: non-food and non-feed industrial applications. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed 8(5): 447-450.https://doi.org/10.3920/JIFF2022.x004
-
Van Huis, A., Rumpold, B., Van der Fels-Klerx, H. and Tomberlin, J., 2021. Advancing edible insects as food and feed in a circular economy. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed 7(5): 935-948.https://doi.org/10.3920/JIFF2021.x005
-
Verheyen, G.R., Theunis, M., Vreysen, S., Naessens, T., Noyens, I., Ooms, T., Goossens, S., Pieters, L., Foubert, K. and Miert, S.V., 2020. Glycine-acyl surfactants prepared from black soldier fly fat, coconut oil and palm kernel oil. Current Green Chemistry 7(2): 239-248.https://doi.org/10.2174/2213346107999200424084626
-
Wauters, E., Van Winsen, F., De Mey, Y. and Lauwers, L., 2014. Risk perception, attitudes towards risk and risk management: evidence and implications. Agricultural Economics 60(9): 389-405.https://doi.org/10.17221/176/2013-AGRICECON
-
Wendin, K. and Nyberg, M., 2021. Factors influencing consumer perception and acceptability of insect-based foods. Current Opinion in Food Science 40: 67-71.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2021.01.007
-
Weber, E.U., Blais, A.R. and Betz, N.E., 2002. A domain-specific risk-attitude scale: measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 15(4): 263-290.https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.414
-
Yang, J.S., 2017. The governance environment and innovative SMEs. Small Business Economics 48(3): 525-541.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9802-1
-
Yang, Y. and Cooke, C., 2020. Exploring the barriers to upscaling the production capacity of the edible insect sector in the United Kingdom. British Food Journal 123(4): 1531-1545.https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-04-2020-0310
Supplementary Materials
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Full Text Views | 168 | 153 | 12 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 208 | 196 | 14 |
Barriers, risks and risk management strategies in European insect supply chains
In: Journal of Insects as Food and FeedSearch for other papers by H.H. Niyonsaba in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by J. Höhler in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by H.J. van der Fels-Klerx in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by T. Slijper in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by F. Alleweldt in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by S. Kara in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by R. Zanoli in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A.I.A. Costa in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M. Peters in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M.P.M. Meuwissen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Despite technological developments and regulatory improvements, most actors in the insect sector still face many challenges and uncertainties. While previous research mainly focused on the perception of domain-specific challenges and risks or has been limited to specific stages in the supply chain, this study aims to determine how stakeholders perceive the importance of past barriers and future risks along European insect supply chains, and to identify the applied risk management strategies. Data were collected from stakeholders across four stages of the supply chain (rearers (n=23), processors (n=8), and insect derived feed (n=14), and food (n=12) producers) through an online survey. In total, 60 different barriers and risks, as well as 20 different risk management strategies, were evaluated. We find that stakeholders across all stages of the supply chain perceived ‘financial, cost and market’ barriers and risks as most important, specifically referring to the lack of financial investments and price and demand uncertainties. In addition, legal restrictions were perceived to constrain upscaling opportunities across all supply chain stages. Worker and food safety barriers were generally perceived as least important. The main risk management strategies across all stages of the supply chain related to investments in technologies enhancing stability of both the quality and the quantity of insects and derived products. Stakeholders were most optimistic about the future reduction of ‘operational’ and ‘financial, cost and market’ risks. To further stimulate upscaling of the sector, we recommend to enhance financing opportunities, and to improve authorisations for the use of different substrates and the production of a wider set of insect-based ingredients for feed and food products.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Full Text Views | 168 | 153 | 12 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 208 | 196 | 14 |