Does the receipt of benefits from some common resource create an obligation to contribute toward its maintenance? If so, what is the basis of this obligation? I consider whether individual contributions to climate change can be impugned as wrongful free riding upon the stability of the planet's climate system, when persons enjoy its benefits but refuse to bear their share of its maintenance costs. Two main arguments will be advanced: the first urges further modification of H.L.A. Hart’s “principle of fairness” as the basis for demanding that would-be free riders pay their fair share in the context of climate change, while the second claims that remedial action on climate change is better captured through collective action analysis than through harm principles that seek to connect individual actions to bad environmental outcomes.
Gosseries (2004) and Gardiner (2011) have likewise cast climate change as resulting from free riding, with Gosseries terming it a problem of ‘transgenerational free riding,’ focusing on historical emissions and seeking a basis for national mitigation burden-sharing principles rather than as a way to fault individual pollution actions and thus to justify state coercion, and Gardiner examining free riding at the individual level but invoking virtue ethics to ward off such selfish motives. See Axel Gosseries, ‘Historical Emissions and Free Riding,’ Ethical Perspectives 11 (2004), pp. 36–60, and Stephen M. Gardiner, A Perfect Moral Storm: The Ethical Tragedy of Climate Change (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011).
Derek Parfit, Reasons and Persons (New York: Oxford University Press, 1984), p. 61.
Derek Parfit, Reasons and Persons (New York: Oxford University Press, 1984), p. 61.)| false