Save

In Defense of a Category-Based System for Unification Admissions

In: Journal of Moral Philosophy
Author:
Matthew Lindauer Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy, Brooklyn College, City University of New YorkResearch Fellow, School of Philosophy, Australian National University, matthew.lindauer@anu.edu.au

Search for other papers by Matthew Lindauer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$34.95

Liberal societies typically prefer relatives and spouses of their members over other prospective immigrants seeking admission. Giving this preferential treatment to only certain categories of relationships requires justification. In this paper, I provide a defense of a category-based system for “unification admissions,” non-members seeking admission for the purpose of living in the same society with members on a stable basis, that is compatible with liberalism and, in particular, does not violate the requirement of liberal neutrality. This defense does not commit liberal theorists to the traditional state sovereignty view on immigration, according to which societies have wide latitude to exclude immigrants as they see fit, and shows that, contra Ferracioli, societies are not required to treat relatives, spouses, friends, and creative partners of their members on a par in matters of immigration policy.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 327 38 6
Full Text Views 129 0 0
PDF Views & Downloads 17 0 0