JOCC 18. 5 on page 483 of the final, published version of the article (https://doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12340041), the order and placement of the author affiliations was wrong. They were placed as follows:
Vojtěch Kaše
GEHIR: Generative Historiography of Religion Project,
Department for the Study of Religions, Faculty of Arts, Masaryk University
Tomáš Hampejs
REECR: Ritual and the Emergence of Early Christian Religion,
Faculty of Theology, University of Helsinki
Zdeněk Pospíšil
GEHIR: Generative Historiography of Religion Project, Department of
Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University
They should be placed as:
Vojtěch Kaše
GEHIR: Generative Historiography of Religion Project,
Department for the Study of Religions, Faculty of Arts, Masaryk University
REECR: Ritual and the Emergence of Early Christian Religion,
Faculty of Theology, University of Helsinki
Tomáš Hampejs
GEHIR: Generative Historiography of Religion Project, Department for the
Study of Religions, Faculty of Arts, Masaryk University
Zdeněk Pospíšil
GEHIR: Generative Historiography of Religion Project, Department of
Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University
JOCC 18. 5 on page 557 of the final, published version of the article (https://doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12340043), the authors have supplied a wrong image. The legend explaining Figure 11 on p. 557 incorrectly referred to the last variable as “reflexivity_level” instead of “cultdiff” as indicated in the caption. The correct version of Figure 11 is:
