Save

Description versus Interpretation: Competing Alternative Strategies for Qualitative Research

In: Journal of Phenomenological Psychology
Author: Amedeo Giorgi1
View More View Less
  • 1 Université du Québec à Montréal
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€29.95$34.95

Abstract

In the contemporary scene, psychological researchers seeking alternative (qualitative) research strategies are turning increasingly toward interpretation theory. However, other strategies are also available, and one of these is descriptive science. Descriptive practices as the basis for the clarification of meanings have received less emphasis because of several epistemological assumptions about meaning that have appeared in the literature of interpretive science. Based upon the work of contemporary transcendental philosophers, especially J. N. Mohanty, this article argues that a descriptive scientific perspective can respond to some of the hermeneutic arguments about meaning and that solid findings can be established descriptively. It is argued that both description and interpretation are legitimate but that they are tied to different conditions and interests.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 2599 737 52
Full Text Views 486 79 3
PDF Views & Downloads 456 156 7