Merleau-Ponty on the Sexed Body

In: Journal of Phenomenological Psychology
Author: Gavin Rae 1
View More View Less
  • 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€29.95$34.95

Abstract

This paper engages with Maurice Merleau-Ponty’s account of the sexed body in the Phenomenology of Perception. I focus on his notion of the sexual schema to show that, contrary to a number of feminist critiques, it does not (1) posit a neutral body overcoded by culturally-contingent sexual determinations or (2) erase the feminine body, but is informed by Merleau-Ponty particular version of the phenomenological reduction whereby factic determinations are “bracketed” to permit the object under study to reveal itself as it is rather than as we wish it to be or have been conditioned to think it. I subsequently defend Merleau-Ponty against the long-standing claim that entwining sexuality with existence prevents an analytic and by extension positive conception of sexuality by arguing that he rejects the monadic logic that this charge is premised on to instead challenge us to think of sexuality in terms of its integration with an individual’s entire embodied, embedded existence. The result is an analysis that emphasizes the ambiguity, afoundationalism, individuality, and open-ended immanent expressivity of sexuality.

  • Alison, A. (1997). The Invisible of the Flesh, Merleau-Ponty and Irigaray. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, Vol. 28 (1), 2029.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barbaras, R. (2004). The Being of the Phenomenon: Merleau-Ponty’s Ontology. Trans. T. Toadvine and L. Lawler. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Beauvior, S. de. (2011). The Second Sex. Trans. C. Borde and S. Malovany-Chevallier. London: Vintage.

  • Butler, J. (1989). Sexual Ideology and Phenomenological Description: A Feminist Critique of Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology of Perception. In J. Allen and I. M. Young (Eds.), The Thinking Muse, Feminism and Modern French Philosophy, (85100). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Carman, T. (2008). Merleau-Ponty. New York: Routledge.

  • Carmen, T. (2014). Between Empiricism and Intellectualism. In R. Diprose and J. Reynolds (Eds.), Merleau-Ponty: Key Concepts, (4456). New York: Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Coole, D. (2007). Merleau-Ponty and Modern Politics after Anti-Humanism. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefied.

  • Descartes, R. (1998). “Meditations on First Philosophy.” In Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy, Fourth edition. Trans. Donald A. Cress, (59103). Indianapolis: Hackett.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dillon, M. C. (1980). Merleau-Ponty on Existential Sexuality: A Critique. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, Vol. 11 (1), 6781.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dillon, M. C. (1998). Merleau-Ponty’s Ontology, Second edition. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

  • Foultier, A. P. (2003). Language and the Gendered Body: Butler’s Early Reading of Merleau-Ponty. Hypatia, Vol. 28 (4), 767783.

  • Gallagher, S. (2016). Merleau-Ponty. In S. Leach and J. Tartaglia (Eds.), Consciousness and the Great Philosophers, What would they have Said about our Mind–Body Problem? (235243). New York: Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Grosz, E. (1993). Merleau-Ponty and Irigaray in the Flesh. Thesis Eleven, Vol. 36 (1), 3759.

  • Guenther, L. (2011). Merleau-Ponty and the Sense of Sexual Difference. Angelaki, Vol. 16 (2), 1933.

  • Hass, L. (2008). Merleau-Ponty’s Philosophy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

  • Heidegger, M. (1984). The Metaphysical Foundations of Logic. Trans. Michael Heim. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

  • Heinämaa, S. (2003). Toward a Phenomenology of Sexual Difference: Husserl, Merleau- Ponty, Beauvoir. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

  • Husserl, E. (1970). The Crisis of European Science and Transcendental Phenomenology. Trans. D. Carr. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Husserl, E. (1983). Ideas pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy, First Book. Trans. F. Kersten. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Husserl, E. (2001). Logical Investigations, Volume One. Trans. J. N. Findlay. New York: Routledge.

  • Irigaray, L. (1993). The Ethics of Sexual Difference. Trans. C. Burke and G. C. Gill. Ithica: Cornell University Press.

  • Levinas, E. (1987). Time and the Other. Trans. R. A. Cohen. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.

  • Marrato, S. (2013). The Intercorporeal Self: Merleau-Ponty on Subjectivity. Albany: State University of New York Press.

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of Perception. Trans. Colin Smith. New York: Routledge.

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1963). In Praise of Philosophy. In In Praise of Philosophy and Other Essays. Trans. J. Wild and J. M. Edie, (370). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). Signs. Trans. R. C. McCleary. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968). The Visible and the Invisible. Ed. C. Lefort. Trans. Alphonso Lingis Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Moya, P., and Larrain, M. E. (2016). Sexuality and Meaning in Freud and Merleau-Ponty. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 97 (3), 737757.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Preester. H. de, (2013). Merleau-Ponty’s Sexual Schema and the Sexual Component of Body Integrity Identity Disorder. Medical Healthcare and Philosophy, Vol. 16 (2), 171184.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rae, G. (2012). Sartre on Authentic and Inauthentic Love. Existential Analysis: Journal of the Society for Existential Analysis, Vol. 23 (1), 7588.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rae, G. (2019). Freud and Heidegger on the ‘Origins’ of Sexuality. Human Studies, Vol. 42 (4), 543563.

  • Reineke, M. J. (1987). Lacan, Merleau-Ponty, and Irigaray: Reflections on a Specular Drama. Auslegung, Vol. 14 (1), 6785.

  • Sanders, M. (2013). Merleau-Ponty and the Ethics of Engagement. In M. Sanders and J. J. Wisnewski (Eds.), Ethics and Phenomenology, 103116. Lanham: Lexington.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sartre, J. P. (2003). Being and Nothingness: An Essay in Phenomenological Ontology. Trans. H. E. Barnes. New York: Routledge.

  • Smith, J. (2005). Merleau‐Ponty and the Phenomenological Reduction. Inquiry, Vol. 48 (6), 553571.

  • Stoller, S. (2000). Reflections on Feminist Merleau-Ponty Skepticism. Hypatia, Vol. 15 (1), 175182.

  • Sullivan, S. (1997). Domination and Dialogue in Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology of Perception. Hypatia, Vol. 12 (1), 119.

  • Young, I. M. (1980). Throwing Like a Girl: A Phenomenology of Feminine Body Comportment Motility and Spatiality. Human Studies, Vol. 3 (2), 137156.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 111 111 40
Full Text Views 7 7 2
PDF Views & Downloads 13 13 3