The Groundwork for Dialectic in Statesman 277a-287b
In: The International Journal of the Platonic TraditionAbstract
In Plato’s Statesman, the Eleatic Stranger leads Socrates the Younger and their audience through an analysis of the statesman in the service of the interlocutors’ becoming “more capable in dialectic regarding all things” (285d7). In this way, the dialectical exercise in the text is both intrinsically and instrumentally valuable, as it yields a philosophically rigorous account of statesmanship and exhibits a method of dialectical inquiry. After the series of bifurcatory divisions in the Sophist and early Statesman, the Stranger changes to a non-bifurcatory method of dividing to account for the statesman, but does not explain the reason for this change. I argue that the change is prepared by the elements discussed in the digression from 277a2 to 287b2. Here the Stranger makes use of four concepts that are crucial for understanding this change: the notion of paradigm, the paradigms of care and the weaver, and the notion of due measure. I claim that the notion of paradigm clarifies the nature of dialectical inquiry, care and weaving act as paradigms appropriate to dialectical practice, and an account of due measure offers insight into the constitutive ratios that govern the structuring of kinds pursued through dialectical inquiry. I suggest that the non-bifurcatory method is intended to articulate knowledge in the strictest sense, or knowledge of the forms, presenting a method of inquiry into being and its structure that will foster the turning of the soul from things to forms that Socrates describes in the Republic.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Homer. Iliad. Stanley Lombardo (trans.). 1997. Iliad. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
-
Plato. Meno. G.M.A. Grube (trans.). 2002. Five Dialogues. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
-
Plato. Parmenides. Mary Louise Gill (trans.). 1996. Parmenides. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
-
Plato. Phaedrus. Stephen Scully (trans.). 2003. Plato’s Phaedrus. Newburyport, MA: Focus Philosophical Library.
-
Plato. Philebus. Dorothea Frede (trans.). 1993. Philebus. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
-
Plato. Republic. Allan Bloom (trans.). 1968. The Republic of Plato. New York: Basic Books
-
Plato. Sophist. Eva Brann, Peter Kalkavage, and Eric Salem (trans.). 1996. Plato’s Sophist: The Professor of Wisdom. Newburyport, MA: Focus Philosophical Library.
-
Plato. Statesman. Eva Brann, Peter Kalkavage, and Eric Salem (trans.). 2012. Plato’s Statesman. Newburyport, MA: Focus Philosophical Library.
-
Plato. Theaetetus. Joe Sachs (trans.). 2004. Plato’s Theaetetus. Newburyport, MA: Focus, Philosophical Library.
-
Ackrill, J.L. 1970. ‘In Defence of Platonic Division’ in O. Wood and G. Pitcher (eds.), Ryle: A Collection of Critical Essays. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
-
Annas, Julia. 1995. ‘Introduction’ in J. Annas and R. Waterfield (eds.), Plato’s Statesman, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Brown, Lesley. 2010. ‘Definition and Division in Plato’s Sophist’ in D. Charles (ed.), Definition in Greek Philosophy, 151-171. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Cohen, S. Marc. 1973. ‘Plato’s Method of Division’ in J.M.E. Moravcsik, Patterns in Plato’s Thought. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
-
Cornford, Francis. 1935. Plato’s Theory of Knowledge. New York: Harcourt Brace.
-
Crombie, I.M. 1963. An Examination of Plato’s Doctrines, two volumes. London: Routledge.
-
Fine, Gail. 2014. The Possibility of Inquiry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Gill, Mary Louise. 2006. ‘Models in Plato’s Sophist and Statesman.’ Plato (The Journal of the International Plato Society) 6.
-
Gill, Mary Louise. 2010. ‘Division and Definition in Plato’s Sophist and Statesman’ in D. Charles (ed.), Definition in Greek Philosophy, 172-199. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Goldschmidt, Victor. 1947. Le Paradigme dans la dialectique platonicienne. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
-
Gómez-Lobo, Alfonso. 1977. ‘Plato’s Description of Dialectic in the Sophist 253d1-e.’ Phronesis 22, 29-47.
-
Harte, Verity. 2002. Plato on Parts and Wholes: The Metaphysics of Structure. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
-
Harvey, David. 2009. ‘Technê and the Good in Plato’s Statesman and Philebus.’ Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 1, 1-34.
-
Ionescu, Cristina. 2013. ‘Dialectic in Plato’s Sophist: Division and the Communion of Kinds.’ Arethusa 46, 41-64.
-
Ionescu, Cristina. 2014. ‘Dialectical Method and Myth in Plato’s Statesman.’ Ancient Philosophy 34(1), 29-46.
-
Ionescu, Cristina. 2016. ‘Due Measure and the Dialectical Method in Plato’s Statesman.’ Journal of Philosophical Research 41, 77-104.
-
Lane, M.S. 1998. Method and Politics in Plato’s Statesman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Miller, Mitchell. 1980. The Philosopher in Plato’s Statesman. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
-
Miller, Mitchell. 1986. Plato’s Parmenides: The Conversion of the Soul. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
-
Miller, Mitchell. 1992. ‘Unity and Logos: A Reading of Theaetetus 201c-210a.’ Ancient Philosophy XII, no. 1, 87-110.
-
Miller, Mitchell. 1999. ‘Dialectical Education and Unwritten Teachings in Plato’s Statesman’ in J.M. van Ophuijsen (ed.), Plato and Platonism. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.
-
Miller, Mitchell. 2016. ‘What the Dialectician Discerns: A Reading of Sophist 253d-e.’ Ancient Philosophy 36, 2, pp. 1-32.
-
Notomi, Noburu. 1999. The Unity of Plato’s Sophist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Owen, G.E.L. 1973. ‘Plato and the Unpredictable’ in E. Lee, A. Mourelatos, and R. Rorty (eds.), Exegesis and Argument. New York: Humanities Press.
-
Rosen, Stanley. 1983. Plato’s Sophist: The Drama of Original and Image. South Bend, IN: St. Augustine’s Press.
-
Rosen, Stanley. 1995. Plato’s Statesman: The Web of Politics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
-
Rowe, Christopher. 1996. ‘The Politicus: Form and Structure’ in C. Gill and M.M. McCabe (eds.), Form and Argument in Late Plato. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
-
Ryle, Gilbert. 1966. Plato’s Progress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Sallis, John. 1996. Being and Logos. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, Third Edition.
-
Sanday, Eric. 2015. A Study of Dialectic in Plato’s Parmenides. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
-
Sanday, Eric. 2017. ‘Paradigm and Dialectical Inquiry in Plato’s Statesman’ in J. Sallis (ed.), Plato’s Statesman: Dialectic, Myth, and Politics. Albany: SUNY Press.
-
Sayre, Kenneth. 1969. Plato’s Analytic Method. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
-
Sayre, Kenneth. 1983. Plato’s Late Ontology: A Riddle Resolved. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
-
Sayre, Kenneth. 2006. Metaphysics and Method in Plato’s Statesman. New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Skemp, J. B. 1952. Plato, Statesman. Bristol: Bristol Classical Press.
-
Vlastos, Gregory. 1991. Socrates: Ironist and Moral Philosopher. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
-
Weiss, Roslyn. 1995. ‘Statesman as epistēmōn: Caretaker, Physician, and Weaver’ in C.J. Rowe (ed.), Reading the Statesman. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag. 213-22.
-
White, David A. 2007. Myth, Metaphysics, and Dialectic in Plato’s Statesman. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.
-
Wiitala, Michael. 2014. ‘The Forms in the Euthyphro and Statesman: A Case Against the Developmental Reading of Plato’s Dialogues.’ International Philosophical Quarterly 54 (4), 393-410.
-
Wiitala, Michael. 2018. ‘The Argument against the Friends of the Forms Revisited: Sophist 248a4-249d5.’ Apeiron 51 (2): 171-200.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 261 | 32 | 4 |
| Full Text Views | 331 | 41 | 4 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 132 | 57 | 4 |
The Groundwork for Dialectic in Statesman 277a-287b
In: The International Journal of the Platonic TraditionAbstract
In Plato’s Statesman, the Eleatic Stranger leads Socrates the Younger and their audience through an analysis of the statesman in the service of the interlocutors’ becoming “more capable in dialectic regarding all things” (285d7). In this way, the dialectical exercise in the text is both intrinsically and instrumentally valuable, as it yields a philosophically rigorous account of statesmanship and exhibits a method of dialectical inquiry. After the series of bifurcatory divisions in the Sophist and early Statesman, the Stranger changes to a non-bifurcatory method of dividing to account for the statesman, but does not explain the reason for this change. I argue that the change is prepared by the elements discussed in the digression from 277a2 to 287b2. Here the Stranger makes use of four concepts that are crucial for understanding this change: the notion of paradigm, the paradigms of care and the weaver, and the notion of due measure. I claim that the notion of paradigm clarifies the nature of dialectical inquiry, care and weaving act as paradigms appropriate to dialectical practice, and an account of due measure offers insight into the constitutive ratios that govern the structuring of kinds pursued through dialectical inquiry. I suggest that the non-bifurcatory method is intended to articulate knowledge in the strictest sense, or knowledge of the forms, presenting a method of inquiry into being and its structure that will foster the turning of the soul from things to forms that Socrates describes in the Republic.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 261 | 32 | 4 |
| Full Text Views | 331 | 41 | 4 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 132 | 57 | 4 |