This article analyses indirect FDI, denoting investment projects, in which the ultimate owner is different from the immediate investor. Reasons for the existence of this type of investment projects can be mostly corporate strategies and tax considerations. The development impact of indirect FDI is not necessarily negative; however it varies by the key types of indirect FDI (delegation of power to regional headquarters, nearshoring, concealed investment, and round tripping). It also depends on how the project money is transhipped: through an affiliate abroad, or through a special purpose entity. Government polices may influence largely the extent and development impact of indirect FDI, especially through tax policies. The phenomenon deserves more attention in the future, as currently indirect FDI is an under-researched topic.

  • AlmeidaA.; BarcellosE.P.; CyrinoÁ.B.; CretoiuS.L.; Alkmim De Souza LimaA.V.; RadicchiC.C., 2007: Outward Foreign Direct Investment by Enterprises from Brazil. In: MugioneF.; WeeK. H., op. cit., pp. 23–35.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • AltzingerW.; BellakC., 1999: Direct versus Indirect FDI: Impact on Domestic Exports and Employment. Working Paper Series: Growth and Employment in Europe: Sustainability and Competitiveness N° 9. Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration, Vienna, November.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • AltzingerW.; BellakC.; JaklicA.; RojecM., 2003: Direct Versus Indirect Foreign Investment from Transition Economies: Is There a Difference in Parent Company/Home Country Impact? In: SvetlicicM.; RojecM., op. cit., pp. 91–110.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • AnandM.; MahajanK., 2009: Implications of the New FDI Regime: Clarifications Required for Effective Implementation. SEBI and Corporate Laws (National Law University Jodhpur (NLUJ)), 96 (4) (December): 70–83.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CastellsM., 2010: The Rise of the Network Society, Volume I: The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture. Second Edition. Wiley–Blackwell.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DunningJ.H.; DilyardJ.R., 1999: Towards a General Paradigm of Foreign Direct and Foreign Portfolio Investment. Transnational Corporations, 8 (1): 1–52.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HirschS., 2012: Nation States and Nationality of MNEs. Columbia FDI Perspectives N° 57. Vale Columbia Center on Sustainable International Investment, New York, 23 January.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • JaklicA., 2003: Slovenian Outward Foreign Direct Investment. In: SvetlicicM.; RojecM., op. cit., pp. 205–225.

  • JaklicA., 2011: Outward FDI from Slovenia and its Policy Context. Columbia FDI Profiles. Vale Columbia Center on Sustainable International Investment, New York, 5 October.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kalotay, K., 2006: Outward Foreign Direct Investment from Russia in a Global Context. Journal of East-West Business, 11 (3–4): 9–22.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KalotayK., 2010: The Political Aspect of Foreign Direct Investment: The Case of the Hungarian Oil Firm MOL. The Journal of World Investment & Trade, 11 (1): 79–90.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KoroknaiP.; Lénárt-OdoránR., 2011: The Role of Special Purpose Entities in the Hungarian Economy and in Statistics. MNB Bulletin, National Bank of Hungary, October, pp. 51–60.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MugioneF.; WeeK. H. (eds.), 2007: Global Players from Emerging Markets: Strengthening Enterprise Competitiveness through Outward Investment. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, New York and Geneva.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • OvereschM.; WamserG., 2009: Who Cares About Corporate Taxation? Asymmetric Tax Effects on Outbound FDI. The World Economy, 32 (12): 1657–1684.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PeltoE.; VahtraP.; LiuhtoK., 2004: Cyp-Rus Investment Flows to Central and Eastern Europe – Russia’s Direct and Indirect Investments via Cyprus to CEE. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 5 (1): 3–13.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • RoolahtT.; VarblaneU., 2009: The Inward-Outward Dynamics in the Internationalisation of Baltic Banks. Baltic Journal of Management, 4 (2): 221–242.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • RugraffE., 2010: Strengths and Weaknesses of the Outward FDI Paths of the Central European Countries. Post-Communist Economies, 22 (1): 1–17.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SassM.; KalotayK., 2010: Outward FDI from Hungary and its Policy Context. Columbia FDI Profiles. Vale Columbia Center on Sustainable International Investment, New York, 24 June.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • StonehillA.I.; MoffettM.H. (eds.), 1993: International Financial Management. United Nations Library on Transnational Corporations, Volume 5. Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SvetlicicM.; RojecM. (eds.), 2003: Facilitating Transition by Internationalization: Outward Direct Investment from Central European Economies in Transition. Ashgate, Aldershot.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Unctad, 1999: World Investment Report 1999: Foreign Direct Investment and the Challenge of Development. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, New York and Geneva.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • UNCTAD, 2003: World Investment Report 2003. FDI Policies for Development: National and International Perspectives. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, New York and Geneva.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • UNCTAD, 2009: UNCTAD Training Manual on Statistics for FDI and the Operations of TNCs. Volume I:FDI Flows and Stock Data. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, New York and Geneva.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • UNCTAD, 2010: Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment. UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, New York and Geneva.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • XiaoG., 2004: People’s Republic of China’s Round-tripping FDI: Scale, Causes and Implications. Latin America/Caribbean and Asia/Pacific Economics and Business Association (LAEBA) Working Paper N° 24, December.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 104 92 8
Full Text Views 182 174 0
PDF Downloads 9 7 0