Procedural Economy at the International Court of Justice

in The Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals
Accès limité
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.

Help

 

Have Institutional Access?

Login with your institution. Any other coaching guidance?

Connect

Abstract

In April 2016, the International Court of Justice held a colloquium to commemorate the 70th anniversary of its establishment. One of the principal themes of this event was the potential adoption of improvements to the procedures and working practices of the Court. Responses to a Counsel Survey revealed a general interest in procedural reform at the Court, particularly with respect to the areas of evidence and procedural efficiency. The purpose of this article is to set out a case for procedural reform at the ICJ, presenting multiple options, with supplementary reference to the ITLOS. Whereas the work of the Committee also addresses procedural integrity or “the sound administration of justice”, this contribution will focus upon the Court’s case management procedures to call for their reform in order to enhance procedural economy. This would enable the Court to improve its “throughput” to be able to cope with an expanded caseload.

Procedural Economy at the International Court of Justice

in The Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals
Headings
Figures
  • View in gallery
    ICJ total duration of proceedings by case (in round months), judicial years 1997–1998 to 2016–2017
  • View in gallery
    ICJ duration of proceedings by case (in round months), judicial years 1997–1998 to 2016–2017
Index Card
Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 92 92 22
Full Text Views 57 57 13
PDF Downloads 46 46 13
EPUB Downloads 3 3 0