Touching Curvature and Feeling Size: a Contrast Illusion

in Multisensory Research
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?


We know that our eyes can be deceiving. Here we demonstrate that we should not always trust our sense of touch either. Previous studies have shown that when pinching an object between thumb and index finger, we can under many circumstances accurately perceive its size. In contrast, the current results show that the local curvature at the areas of contact between the object and the fingers causes systematic under- or overestimation of the object’s size. This is rather surprising given that local curvature is not directly related to the object’s size. We suggest an explanation in terms of a contrast between the finger separation and an inferred relationship between local curvature and size. This study provides the first demonstration of an illusory haptic size percept caused by local curvature in a pinch grip.

Touching Curvature and Feeling Size: a Contrast Illusion

in Multisensory Research



  • AdamsW.GrafE.ErnstM. (2004). Experience can change the ‘light-from-above’ priorNat. Neurosci. 710571058.

  • BerrymanL.YauJ.HsiaoS. (2006). Representation of object size in the somatosensory systemJ. Neurophysiol. 962739.

  • BrayanovJ. B.SmithM. A. (2010). Bayesian and “Anti-Bayesian” biases in sensory integration for action and perception in the size–weight illusionJ. Neurophysiol. 10315181531.

  • ErnstM. O. (2007). Learning to integrate arbitrary signals from vision and touchJ. Vis. 7(5) 7.

  • ErnstM. O. (2009). Perceptual learning: Inverting the size–weight illusionCurr. Biol. 19R23R25.

  • FlanaganJ. R.BittnerJ. P.JohanssonR. S. (2008). Experience can change distinct size–weight priors engaged in lifting objects and judging their weightsCurr. Biol. 817421747.

  • GepshteinS.BanksM. (2003). Viewing geometry determines how vision and haptics combine in size perceptionCurr. Biol. 13483488.

  • GirshickA. R.LandyM. S.SimoncelliE. P. (2011). Cardinal rules: Visual orientation perception reflects knowledge of environmental statisticsNat. Neurosci. 14926932.

  • HellerM. A.McCarthyM.SchultzJ.GreeneJ.ShanleyM.ClarkA.SkoczylasS.ProciukJ. (2005). The influence of exploration mode, orientation and configuration on the haptic Muller–Lyer illusionPerception 3414751500.

  • HellerM. A.WalkA. D. M.SchnarrR.KibbleS.LitwillerB.AmbuehlC. (2010). Attenuating the haptic horizontal–vertical curvature illusionAtten. Percept. Psychophys. 7216261641.

  • JenmalmP.BirznieksI.GoodwinA. W.JohanssonR. S. (2003). Influence of object shape on responses of human tactile afferents under conditions characteristic of manipulationEur. J. Neurosci. 18164176.

  • JenmalmP.JohanssonR. (1997). Visual and somatosensory information about object shape control manipulative fingertip forcesJ. Neurosci. 1744864499.

  • JohanssonR.WestlingG. (1984). Roles of glabrous skin receptors and sensorimotor memory in automatic control of precision grip when lifting rougher or more slippery objectsExp. Brain Res. 56550564.

  • KnillD. C. (2007). Learning Bayesian priors for depth perceptionJ. Vis. 7(8) 13.

  • MullerC. M. P.BrennerE.SmeetsJ. B. J. (2009). Maybe they are all circles: Clues and cuesJ. Vis. 9(9) 10.

  • PandayV.TiestW. M. B.KappersA. M. L. (2012). Influence of local properties on the perception of global object orientationIEEE Trans. Haptics 55865.

  • PlaisierM. A.ErnstM. O. (2013). Introducing the shape–length illusion in: World Haptics Conference (WHC) 2013 Daejeon Korea pp. 583–586 IEEE.

  • TeghtsoonianM.TeghtsoonianR. (1965). Seen and felt lengthPsychon. Sci. 3465466.

  • TeghtsoonianR.TeghtsoonianM. (1970). Two varieties of perceived lengthPercept. Psychophys. 8389392.

  • van der HorstB. J.KappersA. M. L. (2008). Using curvature information in haptic shape perception of 3D objectsExp. Brain Res. 190361367.

  • WeissY.SimoncelliE.AdelsonE. (2002). Motion illusions as optimal perceptsNat. Neurosci. 5598604.


  • View in gallery

    (a) Categorical means of minor and major axis comparisons averaged over participants. The dashed line indicates chance level and error bars indicate the between subjects standard error (SE). (b) Proportion of reference-larger responses as a function of the aspect ratio plotted on a log scale. Aspect ratio was calculated as the length of the axis that had to be estimated divided by the length of the other axis. This means that negative aspect ratio differences relate to minor axis comparisons and positive ones to major axis comparisons. Error bars indicate the between subjects standard deviation (SD).

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 30 30 2
Full Text Views 82 82 0
PDF Downloads 4 4 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0