Save

Usefulness of morphological data for the study of nematode biodiversity

In: Nematology
Authors:
Michel Luc6 rue Boutard, 92200 Neuilly sur Seine, France

Search for other papers by Michel Luc in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Marcelo E. DoucetCentro de Zoología Aplicada, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, C.C. 122, 5000 Córdoba, Argentina

Search for other papers by Marcelo E. Doucet in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Renaud FortunerLa Cure, 86420 Verrue, France

Search for other papers by Renaud Fortuner in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Pablo CastilloInstituto de Agricultura Sostenible (IAS), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Apdo. 4084, 14080 Córdoba, Spain

Search for other papers by Pablo Castillo in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Wilfrieda DecraemerRoyal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Brussels and Ghent University, Ledeganckstraat 35, 9000 Ghent, Belgium

Search for other papers by Wilfrieda Decraemer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Paola LaxCentro de Zoología Aplicada, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, C.C. 122, 5000 Córdoba, Argentina

Search for other papers by Paola Lax in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$34.95

Abstract

Public interest in biodiversity has never been so high, but the necessary inventory of existing species is hindered by the scarcity of taxonomists able to characterise and describe new species (α-taxonomy). This situation is particularly worrisome in nematology where only a small fraction of the estimated 105 to 108 existing species has been described and where experienced taxonomists are fast disappearing while the few that are still active find it increasingly difficult to publish morphological descriptions and to get financial support for biodiversity studies. The present disregard for α-taxonomy is said to originate from the excessive reliance by funding agencies and academic authorities on the Impact Factors attributed to scientific journals by ISI (Institute for Scientific Information). Molecular studies gave back some support and prestige to taxonomy, but that approach suffers from some limitations and it cannot be used alone for reaching taxonomic conclusions. In addition, any described DNA sequence should always be linked to a named species whose morphology has been correctly described by a trained taxonomist. The authors call for a renewed interest in α-taxonomy. Electronic publication according to the Code of Zoological Nomenclature would be one solution, but journals and authors seem reluctant to accept it. A variant would be to publish on paper only the diagnosis of the new species. The complete descriptions could be deposited in an Internet database but the setting-up of such a database would be a costly enterprise that would require several years of work by a team composed of morphological and molecular taxonomists and computer scientists.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 192 59 4
Full Text Views 132 8 3
PDF Views & Downloads 34 14 4