Avicenna against Mathematical Platonism

In: Oriens
Author: Mohammad Saleh Zarepour 1
View More View Less
  • 1 Clare Hall, University of Cambridge
Online Publication Date:
01 Nov 2019
In:
Volume 47: Issue 3-4
Article Type:
Research Article
Page Count:
197–243
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1163/18778372-04700100
Keywords:
Plato; Aristotle; Avicenna; mathematical forms; mathematical objects; mathematical Platonism; intermediates

Abstract

In this paper I investigate Avicenna’s criticisms of the separateness of mathematical objects and of the view that they are principles for natural things. These two theses form the core of Plato’s view of mathematics; i.e., mathematical Platonism. Surprisingly, Avicenna does not consider his arguments against these theses as attacks on Plato. This is because his understanding of Plato’s philosophy of mathematics differs from both Plato’s original view and what Aristotle attributes to Plato.

In:
Oriens
E-ISSN:
1877-8372
Print ISSN:
0078-6527
Publisher:
Brill
Cover Oriens
Subjects:
General, Middle East and Islamic Studies

  • Adam James. The Republic of Plato. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1963.

  • Adamson Peter. “The Kindian Tradition: The Structure of Philosophy in Arabic Neoplatonism.” In Libraries of the Neoplatonists. Ed. by Cristina D’Ancona. Leiden: Brill 2007 351–70.

  • Adamson Peter and Fedor Benevich. “The Thought Experimental Method: Avicenna’s Flying Man Argument.” Journal of the American Philosophical Association 4.2 (2018): 147–64.

  • Alexander of Aphrodisias. In Aristotelis metaphysica commentaria [Greek]. Ed. by Michael Hayduck. Berlin: Georg Reimer 1891.

  • Alwishah Ahmed. “Ibn Sīnā on Floating Man Arguments.” Journal of Islamic Philosophy 9 (2013): 49–71.

  • Annas Julia. “On the ‘Intermediates.’ ” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 57.2 (1975): 146–66.

  • Aristotle. The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation. Ed. by Jonathan Barnes. Princeton: Princeton University Press 1984.

  • Arsen Hera S. “A Case for the Utility of the Mathematical Intermediates.” Philosophia Mathematica 20.2 (2012): 200–23.

  • Avicenna. The Metaphysics of The Healing. Ed. and transl. by Michael E. Marmura. Provo: Brigham Young University Press 2005.

  • Bahlul Raja. “Avicenna and the Problem of Universals.” Philosophy and Theology 21.1–2 (2009): 3–25.

  • Benacerraf Paul. “Mathematical Truth.” The Journal of Philosophy 70.19 (1973): 661–79.

  • Bertolacci Amos. The Reception of Aristotle’s Metaphysics in Avicenna’s Kitāb al-Šifāʾ. Leiden: Brill 2006.

  • Black Deborah L. “Estimation (Wahm) in Avicenna: The Logical and Psychological Dimensions.” Dialogue 32.2 (1993): 219–58.

  • Bostock David. Philosophy of Mathematics: An Introduction. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell 2009.

  • Bostock David. “Aristotle’s Philosophy of Mathematics.” In The Oxford Handbook of Aristotle. Ed. by Christopher Shields. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012 465–92.

  • Burnyeat Myles F. “Platonism and Mathematics: A Prelude to Discussion.” In Mathematics and Metaphysics in Aristotle. Ed. by A. Graeser. Bern: Paul Haupt 1987 213–40.

  • Burnyeat Myles F. and Michael Fred. The Seventh Platonic Letter: A Seminar. Ed. by Dominic Scott. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2015.

  • Cherniss Harold F. The Riddle of the Early Academy. Berkeley: University of California Press 1945.

  • Cleary John J. “Emending Aristotle’s Division of Theoretical Sciences.” The Review of Metaphysics 48.1 (1994): 33–70.

  • Corkum Phil. “Aristotle on Mathematical Truth.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20.6 (2012): 1057–76.

  • Dancy Russell. “Speusippus.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Winter 2016 Edition. Ed. by Edward N. Zalta. URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/speusippus/.

  • Dillon John M. The Middle Platonists: 80 B.C. to A.D. 220. Revised edition. Ithaca: Cornell University Press 1996.

  • Eslick Leonard J. “Aristotle and the Identity of Indiscernibles.” The Modern Schoolman 36.4 (1959): 279–87.

  • Eslick Leonard J. “The Two Cratyluses: The Problem of Identity of Indiscernibles.” Atti Del XII Congresso Internazionale Di Filosofia 11 (1960): 81–87.

  • Euclid. The Thirteen Books of Euclid’s Elements. Transl. by Thomas Little Heath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1908.

  • al-Fārābi. Alfārābī’s philosophische Abhandlungen. Ed. by Friedrich Dieterici. Leiden: E.J. Brill 1890.

  • Franklin Lee. “Inventing Intermediates: Mathematical Discourse and Its Objects in Republic VII.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 50.4 (2012): 483–506.

  • Garner John V. “Thinking Beyond Identity: Numbers and the Identity of Indiscernibles in Plato and Proclus.” Idealistic Studies 47.1–2 (2017): 99–122.

  • Gutas Dimitri. “Medical Theory and Scientific Method in the Age of Avicenna.” In Before and After Avicenna: Proceedings of the First Conference of the Avicenna Study Group. Ed. by David C. Reisman and Ahmed H. al-Rahim. Leiden: Brill 2003 145–62.

  • Gutas Dimitri. “The Empiricism of Avicenna.” Oriens 40.2 (2012): 391–436.

  • Gutas Dimitri. Avicenna and the Aristotelian Tradition. 2nd edition. Leiden: Brill 2014.

  • Hall Robert E. “The Wahm in Ibn Sina’s Psychology.” In Intellect and Imagination in Medieval Philosophy. Ed. by Maria Cândida Pacheco and José F. Meirinhos. Turnhout: Brepols 2006 1:533–49.

  • Hodges Wilfrid. “Affirmative and Negative in Ibn Sīnā.” In Insolubles and Consequences: Essays in Honour of Stephen Read. Ed. by Catarina Dutilh Novaes and Ole Thomassen Hjortland. London: College Publications 2012 119–34.

  • Hussey Edward. “Aristotle on Mathematical Objects.” Apeiron 24.4 (1991): 105–33.

  • Hyman Arthur. “Aristotle’s ‘First Matter’ and Avicenna’s and Averroes’ ‘Corporeal Form.’ ” In Essays in Medieval Jewish and Islamic Philosophy. Ed. by Arthur Hyman. New York: KTAV Publishing House 1977 335–56.

  • Ibn Sīnā. Dānešnāma-ye ʿAlāʾīIlāhīyāt. Ed. by Moḥammad Moʿīn. Tehran: Anǧoman-e āṯār-e mellī 1952.

  • Ibn Sīnā. al-Šifāʾ al-Manṭiq al-Madḫal. Ed. by Georges C. Anawāti Maḥmūd al-Ḫuḍayrī and Aḥmad Fuʾād al-Ahwānī. Cairo: al-Maṭbaʿa al-amīrīya 1952.

  • Ibn Sīnā. al-Šifāʾ al-Manṭiq al-Burhān. Ed. by Abū l-ʿAlā ʿAfīfī. Cairo: al-Maṭbaʿa al-amīrīya 1956.

  • Ibn Sīnā. al-Šifāʾ al-Manṭiq al-Safsaṭa. Ed. by Aḥmad Fuʾād al-Ahwānī. Cairo: al-Maṭbaʿa al-amīrīya 1958.

  • Ibn Sīnā. al-Šifāʾ al-Manṭiq al-ʿIbāra. Ed. by Ibrāhīm Madkūr. Cairo: Dār al-kātib al-ʿarabī li-l-ṭabāʿa wa-l-našr 1970.

  • Ibn Sīnā. al-Išārāt wa-l-tanbīhāt bi-Šarḥ al-Ṭūsī al-Manṭiq [= Remarks and Admonitions: With Commentary by Tusi]. Ed. by Sulaymān Dunyā. 3rd edition. Cairo: Dār al-maʿārif 1983.

  • Ibn Sīnā. al-Naǧāt. Ed. by Muhammad Taqī Danišpažūh. Tehran: Entešārāt-e Dānešgāh-e Tehrān 1985.

  • Kahn Charles H. Pythagoras and the Pythagoreans: A Brief History. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company 2001.

  • Kaukua Jari. “Avicenna on Negative Judgement.” Topoi (forthcoming).

  • Kukkonen Taneli. “Ibn Sīnā and the Early History of Thought Experiments.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 52.3 (2014): 433–59.

  • Lear Jonathan. “Aristotle’s Philosophy of Mathematics.” Philosophical Review 91.2 (1982): 161–92.

  • Lizzini Olga. “The Relation Between Form and Matter: Some Brief Observations on the ‘Homology Argument’ (Ilāhīyāt II.4) and the Deduction of Fluxus.” In Interpreting Avicenna—Science and Philosophy in Medieval Islam: Proceedings of the Second Conference of the Avicenna Study Group. Ed. by Jon McGinnis and David C. Reisman. Leiden: Brill 2004 175–85.

  • Marmura Michael E. “Avicenna and the Problem of the Infinite Number of Souls.” Mediaeval Studies 22 (1960): 232–39.

  • Marmura Michael E. “Avicenna’s Chapter on Universals in the Isagoge of His Shifāʾ.” In Islam: Past Influence and Present Challenge. Ed. by Alford T. Welch and Pierre Cachia. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press 1979 34–56.

  • Marmura Michael E. “Avicenna on the Division of Sciences in the Isagoge of His Shifāʾ.” Journal for the History of Arabic Science 4.2 (1980): 239–51.

  • Marmura Michael E. “Avicenna’s ‘Flying Man’ in Context.” The Monist 69.3 (1986): 383–95.

  • Marmura Michael E. “Quiddity and Universality in Avicenna.” In Neoplatonism and Islamic Thought. Ed. by Parviz Morewedge. New York: State University of New York Press 1992 77–88.

  • Marmura Michael E. “Avicenna’s Critique of Platonists in Book VII Chapter 2 of the Metaphysics of His Healing.” In Arabic Theology Arabic Philosophy: From the Many to the One; Essays in Celebration of Richard M. Frank. Ed. by James Montgomery. Louvain: Peeters Publishers 2006 355–69.

  • McGinnis Jon. “Avicennan Infinity: A Select History of the Infinite through Avicenna.” Documenti E Studi Sulla Tradizione Filosofica Medieval 21 (2010): 199–221.

  • McGinnis Jon. “Experimental Thoughts on Thought Experiments in Medieval Islam.” In The Routledge Companion to Thought Experiments. Ed. by M.T. Stuart Y. Fehige & J.R. Brown. London: Routledge 2017 77–91.

  • Merlan Philip. From Platonism to Neoplatonism. 3rd edition. Dordrecht: Springer 1975.

  • Moravcsik Julius. “Plato on Numbers and Mathematics.” In Ancient and Medieval Traditions in the Exact Sciences: Essays in Memory of Wilbur Knorr. Ed. by Patrick Suppes Julius M. Moravcsik and Henry Mendell. Stanford: CSLI Publications 2000 177–96.

  • Mueller Ian. “On Some Academic Theories of Mathematical Objects.” The Journal of Hellenic Studies 106 (1986): 111–20.

  • Panza Marco and Andrea Sereni. Plato’s Problem: An Introduction to Mathematical Platonism. London: Palgrave Macmillan 2013.

  • Plato. Plato: Complete Works. Ed. by John M. Cooper. Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company 1997.

  • Porro Pasquale. “Immateriality and Separation in Avicenna and Thomas Aquinas.” In The Arabic Hebrew and Latin Reception of Avicenna’s Metaphysics. Ed. by Dag Nikolaus Hasse and Amos Bertolacci. Berlin: De Gruyter 2011 275–307.

  • Pritchard Paul. Plato’s Philosophy of Mathematics. Sankt Augustin: Academic Verlag 1995.

  • Proclus. A Commentary on the First Book of Euclid’s Elements. Transl. by Glenn R. Morrow. Princeton: Princeton University Press 1970.

  • Richardson Kara. “Avicenna and Aquinas on Form and Generation.” In The Arabic Hebrew and Latin Reception of Avicenna’s Metaphysics. Ed. by Nikolaus Dag Hasse and Amos Bertolacci. Berlin: De Gruyter 2012 251–74.

  • Riedweg Christoph. Pythagoras: His Life Teaching and Influence. Transl. by Steven Rendall. Ithaca: Cornell University Press 2005.

  • Shapiro Stewart. Thinking about Mathematics: The Philosophy of Mathematics. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2000.

  • Shihadeh Ayman. “Avicenna’s Corporeal Form and Proof of Prime Matter in Twelfth-Century Critical Philosophy: Abū l-Barakāt al-Masʿūdī and al-Rāzī.” Oriens 42.3–4 (2014.): 364–96.

  • Thom Paul. “Al-Fārābī on Indefinite and Privative Names.” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 18.2 (2008): 193–209.

  • Uluç Tahir. “Al-Suhrawardī’s Critique of Ibn Sīnā’s Refutation of the Platonic Forms.” Ilahiyat Studies 3.1 (2012): 7–27.

  • Wedberg Andres. Plato’s Philosophy of Mathematics. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell 1955.

  • Wilson J. Cook. “On the Platonist Doctrine of the ἀσύμβλητοι ἀριθμοί.” The Classical Review 18.5 (1904): 247–60.

  • Yang Moon-Heum. “The Relationship between Hypotheses and Images in the Mathematical Subsection of the Divided Line of Plato’s Republic.” Dialogue 44.2 (2005): 285–312.

  • Zarepour Mohammad Saleh. “Avicenna on the Nature of Mathematical Objects.” Dialogue 55.3 (2016): 511–36.

  • Zarepour Mohammad Saleh. “Avicenna on Mathematical Infinity.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie (forthcoming).

  • Zhmud Leonid Ja. “ ‘All Is Number’? ‘Basic Doctrine’ of Pythagoreanism Reconsidered.” Phronesis 34.3 (1989): 270–92.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 119 120 23
Full Text Views 36 36 5
PDF Downloads 26 26 6