Save

DEFENDING DESIGN ARGUMENTS AGAINST PLANTINGA

In: Philosophia Reformata
View More View Less
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€29.95$34.95

This article criticises Alvin Plantinga’s claim that ‘basic’ design beliefs, which arise without a conscious inference, have more positive epistemic status than non-basic ones and that we cannot evaluate the probabilities involved in inferential, inductive design arguments.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 288 37 3
Full Text Views 110 1 0
PDF Views & Downloads 17 2 0