Save

DEFENDING DESIGN ARGUMENTS AGAINST PLANTINGA

In: Philosophia Reformata
Author: Daniel von Wachter
View More View Less
Online Publication Date:
17 Nov 2014
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€29.95$34.95
Add to Cart

Other access options

Rent on DeepDyve
Redeem Access Token

This article criticises Alvin Plantinga’s claim that ‘basic’ design beliefs, which arise without a conscious inference, have more positive epistemic status than non-basic ones and that we cannot evaluate the probabilities involved in inferential, inductive design arguments.

Title:
DEFENDING DESIGN ARGUMENTS AGAINST PLANTINGA
Article Type:
Research Article
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1163/22116117-90000562
Language:
English
Pages:
54–65
In:
Philosophia Reformata
In:
Volume 79: Issue 1
Publisher:
Brill
E-ISSN:
2352-8230
Print ISSN:
0031-8035
Subjects:
General, Theology and World Christianity

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 288 37 3
Full Text Views 110 1 0
PDF Views & Downloads 17 2 0