Parmenides' Modal Fallacy

In: Phronesis
View More View Less
  • 1 University of Southern California, School of Philosophy, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0451, USA

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€25.00$30.00

Abstract

In his great poem, Parmenides uses an argument by elimination to select the correct "way of inquiry" from a pool of two, the ways of is and of is not, joined later by a third, "mixed" way of is and is not. Parmenides' first two ways are soon given modal upgrades – is becomes cannot not be, and is not becomes necessarily is not (B2, 3-6) – and these are no longer contradictories of one another. And is the common view right, that Parmenides rejects the "mixed" way because it is a contradiction? I argue that the modal upgrades are the product of an illicit modal shift. This same shift, built into two Exclusion Arguments, gives Parmenides a novel argument to show that the "mixed" way fails. Given the independent failure of the way of is not, Parmenides' argument by elimination is complete.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 88 33 1
Full Text Views 57 7 1
PDF Downloads 42 13 2