Images, Appearances, and Phantasia in Aristotle

In: Phronesis
View More View Less
  • 1 Department of Philosophy, University of Pennsylvania, 433 Claudia Cohen Hall, 249 S. 36th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€25.00$30.00

Abstract

Aristotle’s account of phantasia in De Anima 3.3 is notoriously difficult to decipher. At one point he describes phantasia as a capacity for producing images, but then later in the same chapter it is clear phantasia is supposed to explain appearances, such as why the sun appears to be a foot wide. Many commentators argue that images cannot explain appearances, and so they claim that Aristotle is using phantasia in two different ways. In this paper I argue that images actually explain perceptual appearances for Aristotle, and so phantasia always refers to images. I take a new approach to interpreting DA 3.3, reading it alongside Plato’s Theaetetus and Sophist. In the Theaetetus, Socrates explains how memory gives rise to perceptual appearance. I claim that Aristotle adopts Socrates’ account of perceptual appearance, but what Socrates calls memory, Aristotle calls phantasia.

  • Barnes J. The Complete Works of Aristotle 1984 2 vols Princeton

  • Block I. ‘Truth and Error in Aristotle’s Theory of Sense Perception’ The Philosophical Quarterly 1961 11 1 9

  • Burnyeat M. ‘Is An Aristotelian Philosophy of Mind Still Credible? (A Draft)’ Nussbaum and Rorty 1992 15 26 (1992)

  • Cashdollar S. ‘Aristotle’s Account of Incidental Perception’ Phronesis 1973 18 156 175

  • Caston V. ‘Why Aristotle Needs Imagination’ Phronesis 1996 41 20 55

  • Caston V. Salles R. ‘The Spirit and the Letter: Aristotle on Perception’ Metaphysics, Soul, and Ethics: Themes from the work of Richard Sorabji 2005 Oxford 245 320

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cooper J. Hutchinson D. S. Plato: Complete Works 1997 Indianapolis

  • Dow J. ‘Feeling Fantastic? Emotions and Appearances in Aristotle’ Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 2010 37 143 176

  • Everson S. Aristotle on Perception 1999 Oxford

  • Frede D. ‘The Cognitive Role of Phantasia in Aristotle’ Nussbaum and Rorty 1992 280 295 (1992)

  • Freudenthal J. Ueber Den Begriff Des Wortes ‘Phantasia’ Bei Aristoteles 1863 Göttingen

  • Gregoric P. Aristotle on the Common Sense 2007 Oxford

  • Hamlyn D. W. Aristotle’s De anima, Books II and III (with certain passages from Book I) 1968a Oxford

  • Hamlyn D. W. Koine Aisthesis The Monist 1968b 52 195 209

  • Hicks R. D. Aristotle, De anima. With translation, introduction and notes 1907 Cambridge

  • Johansen T. K. Aristotle on the Sense-Organs 1997 Cambridge

  • Kahn C. Barnes J., Schofield M. & Sorabji R. ‘Sensation and Consciousness in Aristotle’s Psychology’ Articles on Aristotle. Vol. 4: Psychology and Aesthetics 1979 London 1 31

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

    Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 1966 48 43 81

  • Lorenz H. The Brute Within: Appetitive Desire in Plato and Aristotle 2006 Oxford

  • Lycos K. ‘Aristotle and Plato on “Appearing” ’ Mind 1964 73 496 514

  • Modrak D. Koine Aisthesis and the Discrimination of Sensible Differences in De Anima III.2’ Canadian Journal of Philosophy 1981 11 405 423

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Modrak D. ‘Φαντασία Reconsidered’ Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 1986 68 47 69

  • Nussbaum M. C. ‘The Role of Phantasia in Aristotle’s Explanation of Action’ Aristotle’s De Motu Animalium 1978 Princeton 221 269

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nussbaum M. C. Rorty A. O. Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima 1992 Oxford

  • Rees D. A. Anton John & Kustas George ‘Aristotle’s Treatment of Phantasia Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy 1971 Albany 491 504

  • Rorty A. O. ‘Aristotle on the Metaphysical Status of “Pathē”’ The Review of Metaphysics 1984 37 521 546

  • Ross D. Aristotle De Anima 1961 Oxford

  • Schofield M. ‘Aristotle on the Imagination’ Nussbaum and Rorty 1992 249 277 (1992)

    Lloyd G. E. R. & Owen G. E. L. Aristotle on Mind and the Senses. Proceedings of the Seventh Symposium Aristotelicum 1978 Cambridge 99 141

  • Sorabji R. Aristotle on Memory 1972 Providence, RI.

  • Sorabji R. ‘Body and Soul in Aristotle’ Philosophy 1974 49 63 89

  • Sorabji R. ‘Intentionality and Psychological Processes’ Nussbaum and Rorty 1992 195 225 (1992)

  • Turnbull K. ‘Aristotle on Imagination: De Anima III’, Ancient Philosophy 1994 14 319 34

  • Watson G. ‘Φαντασία in Aristotle, De Anima 3. 3’ Classical Quarterly 1982 32 100 113

  • Wedin M. Mind and Imagination 1988 New Haven / London

  • White K. ‘The Meaning of Phantasia in Aristotle’s De Anima III, 3-8’ Dialogue 1985 24 483 505

  • 26)

    Caston (1996) also reads DA 3.3 as a chapter on error. Other commentators note that Aristotle discusses error in this chapter, but do not seem to recognize that the chapter is organized around the problem of error.

  • 33)

    Cashdollar (1973) offers an account of incidental perception for Aristotle that is very similar to the one I have presented in this section. He states that to perceive a ‘colored object as y, I surely must have y stored as an image and one which becomes spontaneously conjoined with a certain proper sensible when it is perceived. The single awareness of that conjunction is incidental perception. It is probable that, in general terms and with the differences noted above, Aristotle would allow that this association is similar to that of memory and recollection, i.e. that “habit” (451b12, 452a27) plays an important part in associating ‘likenesses’ one with another’ (169). Cashdollar, however, does not tie Aristotle’s discussion of incidental perception to the problem of error or to Plato’s Theaetetus as I do. His interest is in perception, not phantasia.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 348 104 19
Full Text Views 268 22 4
PDF Views & Downloads 71 31 8