Save

The Realist and Rhetorical Dimensions of the Protection of Religious Feelings in Russia

In: Review of Central and East European Law
View More View Less
  • 1 Faculty of Law, National Research University–Higher School of Economics, St. Petersburg, Russia< mich.antonov@gmail.com>
  • | 2 Faculty of Law, St. Petersburg University for the Humanities and Social Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia< ya.samohina@gmail.com>
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€29.95$34.95

The authors examine how the Russian judiciary formulates legal policies when adjudicating cases in which religious beliefs are concerned. First, the authors describe the framework within which their research on this matter is conducted, basing it on the theory of legal argumentation. Applying this framework to the investigation of Russian court practice has enabled the authors to discover important features, which they argue are characteristic of legal reasoning of the judiciary in this category of cases. In particular, the authors note that, at least until the present, the Russian Constitutional Court has chosen to abstain from crafting principles of legal policy regarding religious issues. Furthermore, in religious cases, the Russian judiciary—by and large—does not follow the jurisprudence of the ecthr, and the Russian Supreme Court has no clear-cut policy in handling these cases. In such a situation, ordinary judges choose individual strategies. These are indispensable insomuch as fidelity to the letter of the law is inadequate for adjudicating such cases. Russian court practice (from 1997 on) in religious cases can be more easily understood from this perspective than it can in the light of presumed political influence.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 170 39 2
Full Text Views 137 5 3
PDF Views & Downloads 12 2 0