The Imaginaries of RuNet

The Change of the Elites and the Construction of Online Space

In: Russian Politics
View More View Less
  • 1 1Department of Media and Communications, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom, g.asmolov@lse.ac.uk
  • 2 National Research University Higher School of Economics, Russia

By exploring the changes among online elites who have constructed the Internet, this article traces the unique history of the Russian Internet (RuNet). Illustrating how changes in online elites can be associated with changes in the socio-political role of the online space in general, it concludes that, although the Internet is of global nature, its space is constructed on the level of nation, culture and language. To show this, the article presents five stages in the development of RuNet, suggesting that the change in the stages is associated with the relationship of power between, first, actors (users, developers, the government, etc.) that construct Internet space and, second, alternative elites that emerge online and the traditional elites that seek to take the online space under their control by making their imaginary dominate.

  • 6

    Andrei Soldatov, Irina Borogan, The Red Web. The Struggle between Russia’s digital dictators and the new online revolutionaries (New York: Public Affairs, 2015).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Eugene Gorny, “Understanding the Real Impact of Russian Blogs”, Russian Analytical Digest, no. 69 (2009): 8–11.

  • 18

    Sergei Kuznetsov, Oshchupyvaia slona. Zametki po istorii russkogo internet (Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2004).

  • 19

    Barry M. Leiner et.al., “A brief history of the Internet”, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 39 no. 5 (2009): 22–31.

  • 21

    Janet Abbate, “Government, Business, and the Making of the Internet”, The Business History Review 75, no. 1 (Spring 2001): 147–176.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Tarleton Gillespie, “Engineering a Principle: ‘End-to-End’ in the Design of the Internet” Social Studies of Science 36/3 (June 2006): 427–457, 428.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Patrice Flichy, “The Imaginary Internet: How Utopian Fantasy Shaped the Making of a New Information Infrastructure”, Business and Economic History On-Line, no. 2 (2004): 11.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Robin Mansell, Imagining the Internet: Communication, innovation, and governance (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).

  • 29

    Charles Taylor, “Modern Social Imaginaries”, Public Culture 14, no. 1 (2002): 91–124.

  • 30

    Mansell, Imagining the Internet, 9.

  • 32

    Jon Guice, “Looking backward and forward at the Internet”, The Information Society 14, no. 3 (1998): 201–211.

  • 35

    Mansell, Imagining the Internet, 11.

  • 39

    Elisa Reis, “Perceptions of poverty and inequality among Brazilian elites” in Elite Perceptions of Poverty and Inequality ed. Elisa Reis and Mick Moore, Elite Perceptions of Poverty and Inequality (New York: Zed Books, 2005).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40

    Matias Lopez, “Elite Theory”, Sociopedia.isa (2013): available at http://www.sagepub.net/isa/resources/pdf/Elitetheory.pdf, accessed 16 December 2016.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 47

    Kuznetsov, Oshchupyvaia slona, 20.

  • 49

    Rohozinski, Mapping Russian Cyberspace, 1999; Soldatov and Borogan, The Red Web, 39–43.

  • 50

    Kuznetsov, Oshchupyvaia slona, 45–63.

  • 52

    Natalia Fedorova, “Where is E-LIT in RULINET?”, CyberText Yearbook 2012, available at http://cybertext.hum.jyu.fi/articles/158.pdf, accessed 16 December 2016.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 53

    Kuznetsov, Oshchupyvaia slona, 145.

  • 54

    Kuznetsov, Oshchupyvaia slona, 15.

  • 58

    Soldatov and Borogan, The Red Web, 94–97.

  • 59

    Andrey Podshibiakin, Po-Zhivomu. 1999–2009. LiveJournal v Rossii (Moscow: Kolibri, 2010): 7.

  • 63

    Podshibiakin, Po-Zhivomu, 10.

  • 71

    Florian Toepfl, “Managing public outrage: Power, scandal, and new media in contemporary Russia”, New Media & Society 13, no. 8 (2011): 1314.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 77

    Stephen White and Ian McAllister, “Did Russia (Nearly) have a Facebook Revolution in 2011? Social Media’s Challenge to Authoritarianism”, Politics, 34, no. 1 (2014): 72–84; Oates, Revolution stalled, 165–184.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 80

    Karina Alexanyan, “Social networking on Runet: The view from a moving train” Digital Icons: Studies in Russian, Eurasian and Central European New Media 1, no. 2 (2004): 1–12.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 84

    Anna Klyueva, “Taming Online Political Engagement in Russia: Disempowered Publics, Empowered State and Challenges of the Fully Functioning Society”, International Journal of Communication, no. 10 (2016): 4674.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 85

    Seva Gunitsky, “Corrupting the cyber-commons: Social media as a tool of autocratic stability”, Perspectives on Politics 13, no. 1 (2015): 50.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 86

    Julien Nocetti, “Russia’s’ dictatorship-of-the-law’s approach to internet policy”, Internet Policy Review 4, no. 4 (2015), doi: 10.14763/2015.4.380.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 87

    Tom Balmforth, “Meet The Kremlin’s Young Army Of Cybersnitches”, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, 26 March 2015, available at http://www.rferl.org/a/russia-mediagvardia-stalin-era-internet-snitching/26921838.html, accessed 16 December 2016.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 533 274 18
Full Text Views 295 60 0
PDF Downloads 58 37 0