Save

Office Politics: Tatarstan’s Presidency and the Symbolic Politics of Regionalism

In: Russian Politics
Author:
Adam Charles Lenton Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Political Science, George Washington University Washington, DC USA

Search for other papers by Adam Charles Lenton in
https://brill.com/search?f_0=author&q_0=Adam+Charles+Lenton
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7917-9266
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$34.95

Abstract

This article explores developments in center-region relations between the Russian federal government and the Republic of Tatarstan, a federal subject of the Russian Federation. I argue that instrumentalist accounts are unable to satisfactorily explain several key moments in Tatarstan’s relations with the federal center, and that a focus on symbolic politics provides important analytical leverage. I examine three such episodes: aborted plans to introduce a Latin script for the Tatar language in 1999, the expiration of treaty-based relations and the assault on the region’s Tatar-language education policy in 2017, and the institution of the presidency – which exists to this day. In all three cases, interest-based explanations alone fail to account for what actually happened, whereas ideational explanations can help explain and interpret regional leaders’ actions. This has important implications for how we understand regional political dynamics in Russia amidst conditions of centralization.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 691 529 41
Full Text Views 36 22 0
PDF Views & Downloads 90 55 0