Theorists of liberalism put forward diverse conditions for what makes a state just and legitimate. In what follows I examine Cécile Laborde’s suggestion that a just and legitimate liberal state may have an established religion. Such a state may take the form of what she calls Divinitia: a state with some symbolic recognition of religion, conservative laws in matters of bioethics including abortion, religious accommodation from general laws, and religious references in public debate. I argue that Laborde’s requirement that public justification of policies by public officials is conducted in terms of accessible reasons either rules out too many or too few policies. I then suggest that not only justice but also the legitimacy of states can be ensured only if concern for justice has a greater role to play in the selection of state policies than Laborde suggests. We have good reasons to doubt that Divinita would qualify as just and legitimate.
Fowler, Timothy and Stemplowska, Zofia. 2015. “The Asymmetry Objection Rides Again: On the Nature and Significance of Justificatory Disagreement,” Journal of Applied Philosophy 32(2): 133–146.
Laborde, Cécile. 2017. Liberalism’s Religion. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Pettit, Phillip. 2015. “Justice: Social and Political,” in Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy, Volume 1, ed. David Sobel, Peter Vallentyne and Steven Wall (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 9–35.
Jonathan Quong. 2011. Liberalism Without Perfection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stemplowska, Zofia and Swift, Adam. 2018. “Dethroning Democratic Legitimacy,” in Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy, Volume 4, ed. David Sobel, Peter Vallentyne and Steven Wall (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 3–27.
Valentini, Laura. 2012. “Assessing the Global Order: Justice, Legitimacy, or Political Justice?,” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15(5): 593–612.