From Representative to Anti-Civic Populist Democracy?

Development and Forms of Civil Society in Contemporary Bulgaria

In: Southeastern Europe
View More View Less
  • 1 Sofia University, Sofia, Bulgaria

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€29.95$34.95

This article analyses the emergence and development of different forms of civil society in Bulgaria from the late 1980s to the present day, focusing on ngos and the large anti-government protests in 1989–1991, 1997, and 2013–2014. It shows that civil society has been developing in ebbs and flows, its main actors having alt-civic and fake doubles: nationalist movements and fake counter-protests. Recent developments indicate a clear trend of transition from representative to direct democracy, which coincides with the populist orientation of most parties. This coincidence is dangerous because populist parties, following the romantic tradition, reinvented the figure of “the people” as traditionalistic, nationalistic, and conservative. “Civil society,” seen as “alien,” was constructed as an enemy of “the people.” The author argues that defending the pluralistic values of civil society against the thus-invented “people,” is the main challenge to democracy in Bulgaria today.

  • Alexander, J. 2006. The Civil Sphere (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

  • Avramov, R. 2008. Pari i destabilizatsiya v Bŭlgariya. 1948–1989 [Money and destabilization in Bulgaria. 1948–1989], (Sofia: CIELA).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barber, B. 2003. Strong Democracy. Participatory Politics for a New Age, 3rd ed. (Berkeley: University of California Press).

  • Bogdanov, L. 2017. “Pobediteli i gubeshti: promenite v strukturata na bŭlgarskata ikonomika v poslednoto desetiletie” [Winners and Loosers: Structural Change in Bulgarian Economy During the Last Decade], Sot͡siologicheski problemi [Sociological Problems], N 1–2: 48-63.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Castells, M. 2015. Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Polity Press).

  • Civil Society Without the Citizens: An Assessment of Bulgarian Civil Society. 2005. Sofia: Balkan Assist Association. https://www.civicus.org/index.php/media-center-2/reports-publications/csi-reports/europe/673-bulgaria (accessed 1 July 2019).

  • Crouch, C. 2000. “Coping with Post-Democracy” (London: Fabian Society). https://www.fabians.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Post-Democracy.pdf (accessed 1 July 2019).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dahrendorf, R. 1997. After 1989: Morals, Revolution and Civil Society (New York: St. Martin’s Press).

  • della Porta, D. 2013. Can Democracy Be Saved? Participation, Deliberation and Social Movements (Cambridge, UK, and Malden: Polity Press).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ditchev, I. 2019. Kulturni st͡seni na politicheskoto [Cultural scenes of the political] (Sofia: Prosveta).

  • Foley, M. and B. Edwards . 1996. “The Paradox of Civil Society,” Journal of Democracy 7 (3): 3852.

  • Fotev, G. (ed.). 2009. Evropeĭskite t͡sennosti v sŭvremennoto bŭlgarsko obshtestvo [European values in contemporary Bulgarian society] (Sofia: Sofia University Press).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fotev, G. (ed.). 2019. Evropeĭiskite t͡sennosti: novata konstelat͡sii͡a [European values: the new constellation] (Sofia: New Bulgarian University).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ganev, G. 2017. “Chlenstvoto v ES i ikonomikata na Bŭlgariya” [Membership in the EU and Bulgaria’s Economy], Sot͡siologicheski problemi [Sociological Problems], N 1–2: 38-47.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ganev, V. 2007. Preying on the State. Bulgaria 1989–1997 (Ithaca: Cornell Univ. Press).

  • Gellner, E. 1994. Conditions of Liberty: Civil Society and Its Rivals (London: Hamish Hamilton).

  • Georgieva, V. 2016. Mnozhestva na nesŭglasnite [Multitudes of Dissenters] (Sofia: Sofia University Press).

  • Habermas, J. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society (trans. Thomas Burger with the assistance of Frederick Lawrence ; Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1989 [German original, 1962]).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hasmath, R. , T. Hildebrandt and J.Y.J. Hsu . 2019. “Conceptualizing Government-Organized Non-Governmental Organizations,” Journal of Civil Society 15 (3): 26784. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/310766970_Conceptualizing_Government-Organized_Non-Governmental_Organizations (accessed 1 July 2019).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Havel, V . 1978. “The Power of the Powerless.” https://www.nonviolent-conflict.org/wp-content/uploads/1979/01/the-power-of-the-powerless.pdf (accessed 1 July 2019).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hoffer, E. 1951. The True Believer: Thoughts on the Nature of Mass Movements (New York: Harper & Brothers).

  • Kabakchieva, P. 2001. Grazhdanskoto obshtestvo sreshtu dŭrzhavata: bŭlgarskata situatsiya [Civil society versus the state: the Bulgarian case] (Sofia: LiK).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kabakchieva, P. and D. Hristova Kurzydlowski . 2012. Civil Society in Bulgaria: ngos versus Spontaneous Civic Activism? (Sofia: Open Society Institute).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kabakchieva, P. 2019. “Dimensions of Glocality. The Local ‘Us’ against the Global ‘Them,’Sociological Problems, Special Issue in English, Vol. 51: 2135.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Krastev, I. 2014. “From Politics to Protest,” Journal of Democracy 25 (4): 519.

  • Krasteva, A. 2016. “The White Piano, Or the Dilemma of Creative versus Contestatory (e-)Citizenship,” Digital Icons: Studies in Russian, Eurasian and Central European New Media 15: 8393.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Krasteva, A. , E. Staykova and I. Otova . 2019. “Being a Citizen in Times of Mainstreaming of Populism: Building Post-communist Contestatory and Solidary Citizenship,” in B. Siim , A. Krasteva and A. Saarinen (eds.), Citizens’ Activism and Solidarity Movements. Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan): 21341.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Minev, D. and P. Kabakchieva . 1996. Prekhodŭt: eliti i strategii [The Transition: Elites and Strategies], (Sofia: Sofia Univ. Press).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mineva, M. 2013. “Uchiteli, ikonomisti, chastni individi ili kak pazarŭt zavladi͡a vŭobrazhenieto ni” [Teachers, economists, private individuals, or how the market captured our imagination], Kritika & humanizŭm [Critique & Humanism] 41 (special issue): 24566.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mudde, C. 2004. “The Populist Zeitgeist,” Government and Opposition 39 (4): 54163. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x (accessed 1 July 2019).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Orwell, G. 1968. “Funny, But Not Vulgar,” in The Collected Essays, Journalism and Letters of George Orwell, vol. 3: As I Please, 1943–1945, eds. Sonia Orwell and Ian Angus (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich): 28388.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pavlov, K. 2019. Roli͡ata na internet tehnologiite i sot͡sialnite mrezhi za grazhdanskoto uchastie v Bŭlgarii͡a (na primera na protestite i͡uni 2013 – i͡uli 2014 [The role of internet technologies and social media for citizen participation in Bulgaria (based on a case study of the June 2013 – July 2014 protests]. PhD dissertation (Sofia University).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Putnam, R. 1995. “Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital,” Journal of Democracy 6 (1): 6578.

  • Rosanvallon, P. 2008. Counter-Democracy: Politics in an Age of Distrust (trans. Arthur Goldhammer ; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008 [French original, 2006]).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Scott, J. 1985. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance (New Haven: Yale University Press).

  • Smilov, D. and L. Vajsova (eds.). 2013. Protestŭt. Analizi i pozit͡sii v bŭlgarskata presa – li͡ato 2013 [The protest. Analyses and viewpoints in the Bulgarian press, summer 2013] (Sofia: Iztok-Zapad).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vajsova, L. 2013. “Okupiraĭ Orlov Most! Strukturni izmenenii͡a na publichnostta [Occupy Orlov Most! The structural transformations of the public sphere],” Kritika & humanizĭm [Critique & Humanism] 41 (special issue): 27392.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wieviorka, M. 2008. “Après les nouveaux mouvements sociaux,” in M. Wieviorka , Neuf leçons de sociologie (Paris: Robert Laffont): 11342.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yordanova, L. (ed.). 1997. Ot lumpena do grazhdanina [From lumpen to citizen] (Sofia: Bullex).

  • Zhelev, Zh. 2005. Vŭpreki vsichko. Moi͡ata politicheska biografii͡a [In spite of everything. My political biography] (Sofia: Kolibri).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Znepolski, B. (ed.). 2013. “Narodŭt” i “grazhdanskoto obshtestvo” kato resursi na demokrat͡sii͡ata [“The people” and “civil society” as resources of democracy], Kritika & humanizŭm [Critique & Humanism] 41 (special issue).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 309 308 16
Full Text Views 22 22 1
PDF Views & Downloads 24 24 1