How not to Argue from Science to Skepticism

in International Journal for the Study of Skepticism
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

For at least several decades, and arguably since the time of Descartes, it has been fashionable to offer scientific or quasi-scientific arguments for skepticism about human knowledge. I critique five attempts to argue for skeptical conclusions from the findings of science and scientifically informed common sense.

How not to Argue from Science to Skepticism

in International Journal for the Study of Skepticism

Sections

References

  • AustinJ. L. (1962). Sense and Sensibilia. London: Oxford University Press.

  • BeilbyJ. (ed.). (2002). Naturalism Defeated?: Essays on Plantinga’s Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BruecknerA. (2005). “Fallibilism, Underdetermination, and SkepticismPhilosophy and Phenomenological Research 7: 384391.

  • CornmanJ. W.LehrerK. & PappasG. S. (1992). Philosophical Problems and Arguments: An Introduction. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DancyJ. (1992). “Moral Epistemology” 286–90 in DancyJ. & SosaE. (eds.) A Companion to Epistemology. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • FrancesB. (2005). Scepticism Comes Alive. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • KleinP. (1995). “Skepticism and Closure: Why the Evil Genius Argument FailsPhilosophical Topics 22: 21336.

  • LevinM. (2000). “Demons, Possibility and EvidenceNoûs 34: 42240.

  • MaitzenS. (2010). “A Dilemma for SkepticsTeorema 29: 2334.

  • McDowellJ. (1998). Meaning Knowledge and Reality. Cambridge, MA, & London: Harvard University Press.

  • QuineW. V. (1975). “The Nature of Natural Knowledge” 67–81 in GuttenplanS. (ed.) Mind and Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • ——. (1981). Theories and Things. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • RandallL. (2005). Warped Passages. New York: Harper Collins.

  • RussellB. (1998). The Problems of Philosophy. 2nd edition. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.

  • StroudB. (1984). The Significance of Philosophical Scepticism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • ——. (1994). “Skepticism, ‘Externalism’, and the Goal of EpistemologyProceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supp. Vol. 68: 291307.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • VinciT. (1986). “Critical Notice of Barry Stroud: The Significance of Philosophical ScepticismCanadian Journal of Philosophy 16: 55974.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

     See also Brueckner (2005). I thank an anonymous referee for alerting me to this article.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 45 42 2
Full Text Views 87 87 0
PDF Downloads 14 14 0
EPUB Downloads 8 8 0