Save

Labels and the Treatment of Animals: Archival and Experimental Cases

In: Society & Animals
View More View Less
  • 1 INDIANA UNIVERSITY-PURDUE UNIVERSITY AT INDIANAPOLIS
  • | 2 INDIANA UNIVERSITY-PURDUE UNIVERSITY AT INDIANAPOLIS
  • | 3 INDIANA UNIVERSITY-PURDUE UNIVERSITY AT INDIANAPOLIS
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€29.95$34.95

Abstract

The proposition that sheer labels or categories are important in people's reactions to the treatment of animals was supported by evidence from two sources. First, print archives showed that in the real world animals with a great deal in common such as (a) dolphins and tuna in the same nets; (b) cats and dogs, and pigs and goats in the same laboratories; and (c) native and feral species in the same parks are viewed or treated quite differently by humans. Second, original experiments were conducted wherein some hypothetical maltreatment of animals was held constant, but the animal label was varied over different respondents. Depending on the fictional maltreatment (hooking, shooting) and label (dog, cat, bird, fish, pig, goat) men and women respondents showed strong and systematic patterns of more or less tolerance for such treatment.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 341 99 2
Full Text Views 118 6 0
PDF Views & Downloads 45 12 0