Save

Furries from A to Z (Anthropomorphism to Zoomorphism)

In: Society & Animals
View More View Less
  • 1 Associate Professor, Biological Sciences, Kent State University, Stark, 6000 Frank Ave., N. Canton, OH 44720, USA
  • | 2 Former Undergraduates, Niagara County Community College, Sanborn, NY 14132, USA
  • | 3 Former Undergraduates, Niagara County Community College, Sanborn, NY 14132, USA
  • | 4 Assistant Professor, Social Science Division, Psychology, Niagara County Community College, Sanborn, NY 14132, USA;, Email: kgerbasi@niagaracc.suny.edu
  • | 5 Chairman, Anthrocon, Inc., PO Box 476, Malvern, PA 19355, USA
  • | 6 Graduate Student, Department of Psychology, Park Hall, SUNY Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260-4110, USA
  • | 7 Associate Professor, Psychology, Social Science Division, Niagara County Community College, Sanborn, NY 14132, USA
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€29.95$34.95

Abstract

This study explored the furry identity. Furries are humans interested in anthropomorphic art and cartoons. Some furries have zoomorphic tendencies. Furries often identify with, and/or assume, characteristics of a special/totem species of nonhuman animal. This research surveyed both furries (n = 217) and non-furry individuals (n = 29) attending a furry convention and a comparison group of college students (n = 68). Furries commonly indicated dragons and various canine and feline species as their alternate-species identity; none reported a nonhuman-primate identity. Dichotomous responses (“yes” or “no”) to two key furry-identity questions (“do you consider yourself to be less than 100% human” and “if you could become 0% human, would you”) produced a two-by-two furry typology. These two independent dimensions are self-perception (undistorted versus distorted) and species identity (attained versus unattained). One-quarter of the furry sample answered “yes” to both questions, placing them in the “Distorted Unattained” quadrant. This type of furry has certain characteristics paralleling gender-identity disorder. To explore this parallel, the furry typology, and the proposed construct of “Species Identity Disorder” needs further research.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 3853 1163 88
Full Text Views 643 141 16
PDF Views & Downloads 731 274 34