Resonance of Moral Shocks in Abolitionist Animal Rights Advocacy: Overcoming Contextual Constraints

in Society & Animals
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Jasper and Poulsen (1995) have long argued that moral shocks are critical for recruitment in the nonhuman animal rights movement. Building on this, Decoux (2009) argues that the abolitionist faction of the nonhuman animal rights movement fails to recruit members because it does not effectively utilize descriptions of suffering. However, the effectiveness of moral shocks and subsequent emotional reactions has been questioned. This article reviews the literature surrounding the use of moral shocks in social movements. Based on this review, it is suggested that the exploitation of emotional reactions to depictions of suffering can sometimes prove beneficial to recruitment, but successful use is contextually rooted in preexisting frameworks, ideology, and identity. It is concluded that a reliance on images and narratives might be misconstrued in a society dominated by nonhuman animal welfare ideology.

Resonance of Moral Shocks in Abolitionist Animal Rights Advocacy: Overcoming Contextual Constraints

in Society & Animals



  • AdamsC. The sexual politics of meat: A feminist-vegetarian critical theory 2006 New York The Continuum International Publishing Group Inc. (Original work published 1990)

  • BenfordR. D. Frame disputes within the nuclear disarmament movement Social Forces 1993 71 3 677 701

  • BenfordR. D.SnowD. A. Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment Annual Review of Sociology 2000 26 611 639

  • BlaxterJ. As seen on TV—or seen off? Towards a vegan media critique Critical Society 2009 Winter 1 7 14

  • Boston Vegan Association Respecting animals . . . Means going vegan 2009 Boston, MA Boston Vegan Association [Pamphlet]

  • BurtC.StrongmanK. Uses of images in charity advertising: Improving donations and compliance rates International Journal of Organisational Behavior 2004 8 8 571 580

  • CherryE. Veganism as a cultural movement: A relational approach Social Movement Studies 2006 5 2 155 170

  • ColeM.MorganK. Veganphobia: Derogatory discourses of veganism and the reproduction of speciesism in UK national newspapers The British Journal of Sociology 2011 62 1 134 153

  • CooneyN. Change of heart: What psychology can teach us about spreading social change 2011 Brooklyn, NY Lantern Books

  • DeCouxE. L. Speaking for the modern Prometheus: The significance of animal suffering to the abolition movement. Animal Law 2009 16 1 9 64

  • DeLucaK.PeeplesJ. From public sphere to public screen: Democracy, activism, and the “violence” of Seattle Critical Studies in Media Communication 2002 19 2 125 151

  • EayrsC.EllisN. Charity advertising: For or against people with a mental handicap? British Journal of Psychological Study 1990 29 4 349 360

  • EinwohnerR. L. Gender, class, and social movement outcomes: Identity and effectiveness in two animal rights campaigns Gender and Society 1999 13 1 56 76

  • FelsingerA. Bay area “Back to School” pay per view reaches 725 students Action Reports Campaign News & Commentary 2011 FARM. Retrieved February 25 2012 from:

  • FrancioneG. L. Rain without thunder: The ideology of the animal rights movement 1996 Philadelphia, PA Temple University Press

  • FrancioneG. L. Introduction to animal rights: Your child or the dog? 2000 Philadelphia, PA Temple University Press

  • FrancioneG. L. A comment on “Blood and Guts” advocacy Animal Rights: The Abolitionist Approach 2009 Retrieved May 4 2011 from:

  • FrancioneG.CharltonA. E. Animal rights: The abolitionist approach 2008 [Pamphlet]. Retrieved April 28 2011 from:

  • FrancioneG.GarnerR. The animal rights debate: Abolition or regulation? 2010 New York Columbia University Press

  • FreemanC. P. This little piggy went to press: The American news media’s construction of animals in agriculture The Communication Review 2009 12 1 78 103

  • FreemanC. P. Framing animal rights in the “Go Veg” campaigns of U.S. animal rights organizations Society & Animals 2010 18 2 163 182

  • FreemanC. P. Fishing for animal rights in The Cove: A holistic approach to animal advocacy documentaries. Journal for Critical Animal Studies 2012 10 1 104 118

  • FreemanC.BekoffM.BexellS. Giving voice to the “voiceless”: Incorporating nonhuman animal perspectives as journalistic sources Journalism Studies 2011 12 5 590 607

  • FriedrichB. Personal purity vs. effective advocacy Go Veg ~2010 Retrieved February 24 from:

  • GamsonW. SnowD. A.SouleS. A.KriesiH. Bystanders, public opinion, and the media The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements 2004 Oxford Blackwell Publishing 242 261

  • GoodwinJ.JasperJ. The social movements reader: Cases and concepts 2003 Hoboken, NJ Wiley-Blackwell Publishing

  • GrovesJ. M. GoodwinJ.JasperJ. M.PollettaF. Animal rights and the politics of emotion: Folk constructions of emotion in the animal rights movement Passionate politics: Emotions and social movements 2001 Chicago University of Chicago Press 212 232

  • HallL. Capers in the churchyard: Animal rights advocacy in the age of terror 2006 Darien Nectar Bat Press

  • HerzogH.GoldenL. Moral emotions and social activism: The case of animal rights Journal of Social Issues 2009 65 3 485 498

  • JasperJ. M. The emotions of protest: Affective and reactive emotions in and around social movements. Sociological Forum 1998 13 3 397 424

  • JasperJ. M.PoulsenJ. D. Recruiting strangers and friends: Moral shocks and social networks in animal rights and anti-nuclear protests Social Problems 1995 42 4 493 512

  • JoyM. Strategic action for animals: A handbook on strategic movement building organizing and activism for animal liberation 2008 Brooklyn, NY Lantern Books

  • KewB. Appropriating liberation Society & Animals 2003 4 1 29 49

  • Kilstein J. & Kilkenny A. (Hosts) Animal rights icon Gary Francione, Citizen Radio invades Democracy Now Citizen Radio 2011 March 29 [Show 259] [Podcast]. Retrieved August 3 2011 from:

  • LukeB. Brutal: Manhood and the exploitation of animals 2007 Champaign, IL University of Illinois Press

  • MaheswaranD.Meyers-LevyJ. The influence of message framing and issue involvement Journal of Marketing Research 1990 27 3 361 367

  • MaurerD. Vegetarianism: Movement or moment? 2002 Philadelphia Temple University Press

  • McDonaldB. “Once you know something, you can’t not know it”: An empirical look at becoming vegan Society & Animals 2000 8 1 1 23

  • MikaM. Framing the issue: Religion, secular ethics and the case of animal rights mobilization Social Forces 2006 85 2 915 941

  • NabiR. The effect of disgust-eliciting visuals on attitudes toward animal experimentation Communication Quarterly 2009 46 4 472 484

  • NepstadS.SmithC. GoodwinJ.JasperJ.PollettaF. The social structure of moral outrage in recruitment to the U.S. Central America peace movement Passionate politics: Emotions and social movements 2001 158 174 Chicago University of Chicago Press

  • NorrisJ. Does veganism spread itself? 2009 [Presentation]. Retrieved February 26 2012 from:

  • Peaceful Prairie Sanctuary The faces of “cage-free” egg production ~2010 [Pamphlet]. Retrieved April 28 2011 from:

  • ReganT. Empty cages: Facing the challenge of animal rights 2004 Lanham, MD Rowman and Littlefield

  • RothmanA.SaloveyP.AntoneC.KeoughK.MartinC. The influence of message framing on intentions to perform health behaviors Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1992 29 5 408 433

  • SwanD.McCarthyJ. C. Contesting animal rights on the Internet: Discourse analysis of the social construction of the argument Journal of Language and Social Psychology 2003 22 3 297 320

  • YatesR. Animal welfarism: The strength and resilience of the orthodox On human-nonhuman relations: A sociological exploration of speciesism 2007 Retrieved November 18 2010 from:

  • YatesR. The strength of dominant paradigms: Can animal advocates liberate themselves from animal welfarism? On human-nonhuman relations: A sociological exploration of speciesism 2009 Retrieved November 18 2010 from:

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 192 192 12
Full Text Views 203 203 2
PDF Downloads 31 31 2
EPUB Downloads 12 12 0