Examining Sport Fans and the Endangered Species Who Represent Their Affiliated Team Mascots

in Society & Animals
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship sport fans have with their mascots when represented by a nonhuman animal who is a member of an endangered species group. Adopting a shared responsibility perspective, this study examined the level of knowledge sport fans possess about their endangered species mascot and how sport fan identity might impact one’s desire to learn more. Findings supported the hypothesis that highly identified fans would want to learn more about the endangered species, thus suggesting that sport organizations may be in an advantageous position to create change through organizational initiatives and practices involving partner organizations and in-house conservation efforts.

Examining Sport Fans and the Endangered Species Who Represent Their Affiliated Team Mascots

in Society & Animals

Sections

References

  • BaltzM. E. & RatnaswamyM. J. (2000). Mascot conservation programs: Using college nonhuman animal mascots to support species conservation efforts. Wildlife Society Bulletin28(1) 159-163.

  • BestS. (2009). The rise of critical nonhuman animal studies: Putting theory into action and nonhuman animal liberation into higher education. Journal of Critical Nonhuman Animal Studies7(1) 9-52.

  • BestS. (2014). The politics of total liberation: Revolution for the 21st century. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • BeyerJ. M. & HannahD. R. (2000). The cultural significance of athletics in U.S. higher education. Journal of Sport Management14105-132. doi: 10.1123/jsm.14.2.105.

  • BlakeJ. (1999). Overcoming the ‘value-action gap’ in environmental policy: Tensions between national policy and local experience. Local Environment4(3) 257-278. doi: 10.1080/13549839908725599.

  • BranscombeN. R. & WannD. L. (1991). The positive social and self concept consequences of sports team identification. Journal of Sport and Social Issues15(2) 115-127. doi: 10.1177/019372359101500202.

  • BushA.SilkM.PorterJ. & HoweP. D. (2013). Disability (sport) and discourse: Stories within the Paralympic legacy. Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives14(5) 632-647. doi: 10.1080/14623943.2013.835721.

  • CallaisT. M. (2010). Controversial mascots: Authority and racial hegemony in the maintenance of deviant symbols. Sociological Focus43(1) 61-81.

  • CasperJ. M.PfahlM. W. & McCulloughB. (2014). Intercollegiate sport and the environment: Examining fan engagement based on athletics department sustainability efforts. Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics765-91.

  • CasperJ. M.PfahlM. W. & McSherryM. (2012). Athletics department awareness and action regarding the environment: A study of NCAA athletics departments sustainability practices. Journal of Sport Management2611-29.

  • CohenR. J. (2014). Brand personification: Introduction and overview. Psychology & Marketing31(1) 1-30.

  • CunhaM. P.RegoA. & Vieira da CunhaJ. (2008). Ecocentric management: An update. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management15311-321. doi: 10.1002.csr.169.

  • DalakasV. & RoseG. (2013). Developing brand identity in sport: Lions, and tigers, and bears oh my. In M. P. Pritchard & J. L. Stinson (Eds.) Leveraging brands in sport business (pp. 109-122). New York: Routledge.

  • DonovanJ. (2006). Feminism and the treatment of nonhuman animals: From care to dialogue. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society31(2) 305-329. doi: 10.1086/491750.

  • FinkJ.BurtonL.FarrellA. & ParkerH. (2012). Playing it out. Journal for the Study of Sports and Athletes in Education6(1) 83-106. doi: 10.1179/ssa.2012.6.1.83.

  • GaarderE. (2011). Where the boys aren’t: The predominance of women in nonhuman animal rights activism. Feminist Foundations23(2) 54-76.

  • GiffordR. & NilssonA. (2014). Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behavior: A review. International Journal of Psychology49(3) 141-157. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12034.

  • GruenL. (2009). The faces of nonhuman animal oppression. In A. Ferguson & M. Nagel (Eds.) Dancing with Iris (pp. 161-172). New York: Oxford University Press.

  • HerzogH. A. (2007). Gender differences in human-nonhuman animal interactions: A review. Anthrozoos20(1) 7-21. doi: 10.2752/089279307780216687.

  • InoueY. & KentA. (2012). Sports teams as promoters of pro-environmental behavior: An empirical study. Journal of Sport Management26417-432.

  • JonesR. C. (2015). Nonhuman animal rights is a social justice issue. Contemporary Justice Review18(4) 467-482. doi: 10.1080/10282580.2015.1093689.

  • KaufmanP. & WolffE. A. (2010). Playing and protesting: Sport as a vehicle for social change. Journal of Sport and Social Issues34(2) 154-175. doi: 10.1177/0193723509360218.

  • KleffelD. (2002). Environmental paradigms: Moving toward an ecocentric perspective. In J. W. Kenney (Ed.) Philosophical and theoretical perspectives for advanced nursing practice (pp. 193-202). Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.

  • KollmussA. & AgyemanJ. (2002). Mind the gap: Why people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Educational Research8(3) 239-260. doi: 10.1080/13504620220145401.

  • LeavittP. A.CovarrubiasR.PerezY. A. & FrybergS. A. (2015). “Frozen in time”: The impact of Native American media representations on identity and self-understanding. Journal of Social Issues71(1) 39-53. doi: 10.1111/josi.12095.

  • LewisM. (2001). Franchise relocation and fan allegiance. Sport & Social Issues25(1) 6-19.

  • McCulloughB. P. & CunninghamG. B. (2011). Recycling intensions amongst youth baseball spectators. International Journal of Sport Management & Marketing10(1-2) 104-120. doi: 10.1504/IJSMM.2011.043618.

  • McCulloughB. P. & KellisonT. B. (2016February). Go green for the home team: Sense of place and environmental sustainability in sport. Journal of Sustainability Education111-14.

  • McCulloughB. P.PfahlM. E. & NguyenS. N. (2016). The green waves of environmental sustainability in sport. Sport in Society19(7) 1040-1065. doi: 10.1080/ 17430437.2015.1096251.

  • National Hockey League. (2014). 2014 NHL sustainability report. Retrieved from http://cdn.nhl.com/green/report.

  • NibertD. (2002). Nonhuman animal rights/human rights: Entanglements of oppression and liberation. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

  • NibertD. (2003). Humans and other nonhuman animals: Sociology’s moral and intellectual challenge. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy23(3) 4-25. doi: 10.1108/01443330310790237.

  • NothenG. & AtkinsonM. (2016). In defense of non/humans: Mystification and oppression in the sport mascoting process. In A. E. George & J. L. Schatz (Eds.) Screening the nonhuman: Representations of nonhuman animal others in the media (pp. 169-183). Cleveland, OH: Lexington.

  • PurserR. E.ParkC. & MontuoriA. (1995). Limits to anthropocentrism: Toward an ecocentric organization paradigm? Academy of Management Review20(4) 1053-1089. doi: 10.2307/258965.

  • RobinsonM. J. & TrailG. T. (2005). Relationships among spectator gender, motives, points of attachment, and sport preference. Journal of Sport Management1958-80.

  • Sartore-BaldwinM. L.McCulloughB. P. & Quatman-YatesC. C. (2017). Shared Responsibility and issues of injustice and harm within sport. Quest69(3) 366-383.

  • SchrempfJ. (2014). A social connection approach to corporate responsibility: The case of the fast-food industry and obesity. Business & Society53(2) 300-332. doi: 10.1177/0007650312449577.

  • ShrivastavaP. (1995). Ecocentric management for a risk society. Academy of Management Review20118-127. doi: 10.5465/AMR.1995.9503271996.

  • SingerP. (1975). Nonhuman animal liberation. New York: HarperCollins.

  • SingerP. (2009). Nonhuman animal liberation: The definitive classic of the nonhuman animal movement. New York: HarperCollins.

  • SlowikowskiS. S. (1993). Cultural performance and sport mascots. Journal of Sport & Social Issues17(1) 23-33.

  • SmithA. C. T. & WesterbeekH. M. (2007). Sport as a vehicle for deploying corporate social responsibility. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship2543-54.

  • TheodorakisN. D.KousteliosA.RobinsonL. & BarlasA. (2009). Moderating role of team identification on the relationship between service quality and repurchase intentions among spectators of professional sports. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal19(4) 456-473. doi: 10.1108/09604520910971557.

  • TrendafilovaS. & ChalipL. (2007). The political economy of managing outdoor sporting events. In M. Parent & T. Slack (Eds.) International perspectives on the development of sport (pp. 81-98). Burlington, MA.

  • WadeM. L. (1996). Sports and speciesism. Journal of Philosophy of Sport2310-29.

  • WannD. L. & BranscombeN. R. (1993). Sport fans: Measuring degree of identification with their team. International Journal of Sport Psychology241-17.

  • WooB.TrailG. T.KwonH. H. & AndersonD. (2009). Testing models of motives and points of attachment among spectators in college football. Sport Marketing Quarterly18(1) 38-53.

  • YoungI. M. (2004). Five faces of oppression. In L. Heldke & P. O’Connor (Eds.) Oppression privilege & resistance (pp. 37-63). Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.

  • YoungI. M. (2006). Responsibility and global justice: A social connection model. Social Philosophy and Policy23(1) 102-130.

  • YoungI. M. (2011). Responsibility for justice. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • YoungK. (2014). Toward a less speciesist society. Sociology of Sport Journal31387-401. doi: 10.1123/ssj.2014-0140.

  • ZsolnaiL. (2011). Environmental ethics for business sustainability. International Journal of Social Economics38(11) 892-899. doi: 10.1108/03068291111171397.

Figures

  • View in gallery
    Means, standard deviations, and correlation
  • View in gallery
    Effects of sport fan identity on interest in learning more about protecting the endangered species

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 102 102 34
Full Text Views 5 5 3
PDF Downloads 0 0 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0