This study investigated what methods professional trainers use in their teaching. Interviews with nine professional trainers in sports dressage were analyzed using a qualitative approach. The results showed that trainers had developed a “good eye” using their prior experiences. The trainers helped the riders solve their problems but did not make clear their observations or reasoning for specific instructions. Thus, trainers could further develop the riders’ own practical knowledge. The role of the horse was not made explicit in most cases, showing that recognition of the horse as a sentient and thinking individual is not built into the current teaching practice. Teaching methods would be improved if trainers encouraged riders to pay more attention to the perspective of the horse, to examine how to interpret and attend to the horse’s reactions, and to reflect on these issues in dialog with them.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Åberg, S. (2008). Spelrum. In English: Room for playing. On paradoxes and agreements in the practice of higher musical education (doctoral dissertation). Stockholm University.
Akinleye, A. (2018). Watching dance: Kinesthetic empathy. Retrieved from http://www.watchingdance.org/research/kinesthetic_empathy/.
Aristotle. (1980). The Nicomachean ethics (Trans., D. Ross). UK: Oxford University Press.
Birke, L. (2007). Learning to speak horse: The culture of natural horsemanship. Society & Animals, 15(3), 217–239.
Birke, L. (2009). Investigating human/animal relations. In T. Holmberg (Ed.), Investigating human animal relations in science, culture and work (pp. 18–32). Centrum för Genusvetenskap, Uppsala University, Sweden.
Birke, L., & Thompson, K. (2018). (Un) Stable relations. New York: Routledge.
Brandt, K. (2004). A language of their own: An interactionist approach to human horse communication. Society & Animals, 12(4), 299–316.
Dashper, K. (2016). Learning to communicate: The triad of (mis) communication in horse riding. In D. L. Davis & A. Maurstad (Eds.), The meaning of horses: Biosocial encounters (pp. 87–101). New York: Routledge.
Dashper, K. (2017a). Human-animal relationships in equestrian sport and leisure. New York: Routledge.
Dashper, K. (2017b). Listening to horses. Developing attentive interspecies relationships through sport and leisure. Society & Animals, 25(3), 207–224.
Despret, V. (2004). The body we care for: Figures of anthropo-zoo-genesis. Body & Society, 10(2–3), 111–134.
Evans, R., & Franklin, A. (2010). Equine beats: Unique rhythms (and flouting harmony) of horses and riders. In T. Edenser (Ed.), Geographies of rhythm: Nature, place, motilities, and bodies (pp. 173–188). Farnham: Ashgate.
German National Equestrian Federation. (1997). Principles of riding. Buckingham, UK: The Kenilworth Press Ltd.
Haraway, D. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
Höök, K. (2010). Transferring qualities from horseback riding to design. Proceedings of NordiCHI 2010, Reykjavik, Iceland: ACM Press.
Lundgren, C. (2017). Ridlärares multimodala kommunikation [Multimodality in dressage training]. Scandinavia Sport Studies Forum, 8, 67–86.
Lyle, J. (2002). Stimulated recall: A report on its use in naturalistic research. British Educational Research Journal, 29(6), 861–878.
Maurstad, A., Davis, D. L., & Cowles, S. (2013). Co-being and intra-action in horse-human relationship: A multi-species ethnography of be (com) ing human and be (com) ing a horse. Social Anthropologie, 21(3), 322–335.
Maw, S. J. (2012). What does it mean to teach riding? A snapshot on contemporary practices in England and West Australia (doctoral dissertation). Murdoch University, Australia.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2012). Phenomenology of perception (Trans., D. A. Landes). UK: Routledge.
Meyners, E. (2004). Effective teaching and riding. Hudson, MT: Goals Unlimited Press.
Meyners, E., Müller, H., & Niemann, K. (2014). Rider + horse = 1. How to achieve the fluid dialogue that leads to harmonious performance. London: J. A. Allen.
Oliveira, N. (1976). Reflections of equestrian art. London: J. A. Allen.
Polanyi, M. (1967). The tacit dimension. UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Pröckl, M. (2016). Inifrån och utifrån. In L. Alsterdal & Maria P. (Eds.), Inifrån och utifrån. Om praktisk kunskap i förskolan.
Savvides, N. (2012). Communication as a solution of conflict: Fundamental similarities in divergent methods of horse training. Society & Animals, 20(1), 75–90.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. How professional think in action. New York: Basic Books.
Thorell, G., & Hedenborg, S. (2015). Riding instructors, gender, militarism, and stable culture in Sweden: Continuity and change in the twentieth century. The International Journal of the History of Sport, 32(5), 650–666. DOI: 10.1080/09523367.2015.1021337.
Thorell, G., Hedenborg, S., Stråhlman, O., & Morgan, K. (2016). From giving orders to engaging in dialogue: Military norms being challenged at the Swedish riding school. International Review for the Sociology of Sport. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1012690216665111.
West, D., & de Braganca, F. (2012). A systematic approach to eliciting and gathering the expertise of a ‘knowledge guardian’: An application of the appreciative inquiry method to the study of classical dressage. Systematic Practice and Action Research, 25(3), 241–260. DOI: 10.1007/s11213–11011–9223–9227.
Zetterqvist Blokhuis, M. (2018). The praxis of horse riding. An autoethnographic study. Humanimalia, 9(2), 47–67.
Zetterqvist Blokhuis, M., & Andersson, P. (2019). Riders’ understanding of the role of their horse in sports dressage: Ethical questions. In J. Bornemark, , P. Andersson, & U. Ekström von Essen (Eds.), Equine cultures in transition: Ethical questions (pp. 179–192). New York: Routledge.
Zetterqvist Blokhuis, M., & Lundgren, C. (2017). Riders’ perception of equestrian communication in sports dressage. Society & Animals, 25(6), 573–591.
Zetterqvist Blokhuis, M., Aronsson, A., Hartmann, E., Van Reenen, C. G., & Keeling, L. (2008). Assessing the rider’s seat and horse’s behavior: Difficulties and perspectives. Journal of Applied Welfare Science, 11(3), 191–120.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 706 | 706 | 27 |
Full Text Views | 27 | 27 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 72 | 72 | 0 |
This study investigated what methods professional trainers use in their teaching. Interviews with nine professional trainers in sports dressage were analyzed using a qualitative approach. The results showed that trainers had developed a “good eye” using their prior experiences. The trainers helped the riders solve their problems but did not make clear their observations or reasoning for specific instructions. Thus, trainers could further develop the riders’ own practical knowledge. The role of the horse was not made explicit in most cases, showing that recognition of the horse as a sentient and thinking individual is not built into the current teaching practice. Teaching methods would be improved if trainers encouraged riders to pay more attention to the perspective of the horse, to examine how to interpret and attend to the horse’s reactions, and to reflect on these issues in dialog with them.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 706 | 706 | 27 |
Full Text Views | 27 | 27 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 72 | 72 | 0 |