Technological Determinism(s) and the Study of War

In: Vulcan

The concept of technological determinism has been a mainstay of discussions in history of technology and especially in science and technology studies (sts) for about half a century, yet military history as a field has generally sidestepped the idea as a category of analysis. Military historians, however, would do well to consider some of the insights from these other fields, for they can fall prey to (tacitly) deterministic analyses. Although the emphasis on tactical and strategic factors, as well as leadership and soldiers’ experience, sometimes insulates technological explanations from appearing to be causal, a casual reading of both military history and contemporary military policy seems to show that warfighters and political leaders often see technology as transformative. This is all the more evident in the discussion of military revolutions and especially revolutions in military affairs (RMAs), where technology is a least a leg of the stool, and at “best” a transformative agent.

  • Adler Paul S. 1990. “Marx, Machines, and Skill,” Technology and Culture 31, no. 44: 780812.

  • Altomare Francis X. 2014. “Science Contra Religion in John Updike’s the Invention of the Horse Collar,” The Explicator 72, no. 33: 228232.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bimber Bruce 1994. “Three Faces of Technological Determinism,” in Smith and Marx 199479100.

  • Black Jeremy . 2004. Rethinking Military History. London: Routledge.

  • Black Jeremy . 2013. War and Technology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

  • Boot Max . 2006. War Made New: Weapons, Warriors, and the Making of the Modern World. New York: Gotham Books.

  • Boyne Walter J. 2003. The Influence of Air Power upon History. Gretna, LA: Pelican Books.

  • Brey Philip . 2003. “Theorizing Modernity and Technology,” in Misa, Brey, and Feenberg 20033371.

  • Bridle James . 2018. “Are Fake News and Facebook Really Taking Over? A Mathematician Unpacks Our Algorithmic Crisis,” The Guardian Review, Aug. 416.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brown Gates Mosley . 2019. “Technology’s Unrealistic Promise: The U.S. Army in the 1950s and Technological Determinism,” Vulcan 7: 6280.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Carlisle Y.M. , and Manning D.J. 1999. “Ideological Persuasion and Technological Determinism,” Technology in Society 21, no. 11: 81102.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chambers John Whiteclay . 1991. “The New Military History: Myth and Reality,” The Journal of Military History 55, no. 33: 395406.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Coffman Edward M. 1984. “The New American Military History,” Military Affairs 48, no. 11: 15.

  • Dafoe Allan . 2015. “On Technological Determinism: A Typology, Scope Conditions, and a Mechanism,” Science, Technology, & Human Values 40, no. 66: 10471076.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • de La Cruz Paragas, Fernando and Trisha TC Lin . 2016. “Organizing and Reframing Technological Determinism,” New Media & Society 18, no. 88: 15281546.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DeVries Kelly . 1997. “Catapults Are Not Atomic Bombs: Towards a Redefinition of ‘Effectiveness’ in Premodern Military Technology,” War in History 4, no. 44: 454470.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DeVries Kelly . 2015. “Technological Determinisms of Victory at the Battle of Agincourt,” British Journal for Military History 2, no. 11: 214.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dotson Taylor . 2015. “Technological Determinism and Permissionless Innovation as Technocratic Governing Mentalities: Psychocultural Barriers to the Democratization of Technology,” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 1: 98120.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fuller J.F.C. 1945. Armament and History. New York: Charles Scribner Sons [rpt. New York: Da Capo1998].

  • Ghys Tuur . 2012. “Technology Trees: Freedom and Determinism in Historical Strategy Games,” Game Studies: The International Journal of Computer Game Research, 12, no. 1. Online at http://www.gamestudies.org/1201/articles/tuur_ghys.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hacker Barton C. 1994. “Military Institutions, Weapons, and Social Change: Toward a New History of Military Technology,” Technology and Culture 35, no. 44: 768834.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hacker Barton C. 2005. “The Machines of War: Western Military Technology 1850–2000,” History and Technology 21, no. 33: 255300.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hansen Alvin H. 1921. “The Technological Interpretation of History,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics36, no. 11: 7283

  • Heilbronner Robert L. 1994. “Do Machines Make History” and “Technological Determinism Revisited,” in Smith and Marx 19945378.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Herman P.F.Jr. 1994. “The Military-Technical Revolution,” Defense Analysis 10, no. 11: 9195.

  • Howell David L. 2009. “The Social Life of Firearms in Tokugawa Japan,” Japanese Studies 29, no. 11: 6580.

  • James Simon . 2011. Rome & the Sword: How Warriors & Weapons Shaped Roman History. London: Thames & Hudson.

  • Jensen Geoffrey and Andrew Wiest . 2001. War in the Age of Technology: Myriad Faces of Modern Armed Conflict. New York: New York University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kaiserfeld Thomas . 2015. Beyond Innovation: Technology, Institution and Change as Categories for Social Analysis. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Karsten Peter . 1984. “The ‘New’ American Military History: A Map of the Territory, Explored and Unexplored,” American Quarterly 36, no. 33: 389418.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kranzberg Melvin . 1986. “Technology and History: ‘Kranzberg’s Laws’,” Technology and Culture 27, no. 33: 544560.

  • Lee Wayne E. 2007. “Mind and Matter—Cultural Analysis in American Military History: A Look at the State of the Field,” The Journal of American History 93, no. 44: 11161142.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lepore Jill . 2018. These Truths: A History of the United States. New York: W.W. Norton.

  • Lynn John A. 2003. Battle: A History of Combat and Culture. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

  • MacDougall Rob . 2009. “Technology grows on trees,” Rob MacDougall: Two-Fisted Historian [blog], March 18. Online at http://www.robmacdougall.org/blog/2009/03/technology-grows-on-trees/.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MacKenzie Donald . 1984. “Marx and the Machine,” Technology and Culture 25, no. 33: 473502.

  • Mahan Alfred Thayer . 1890. The Influence of Sea Power upon History, 1660–1783. Boston: Little, Brown, & Co.

  • Marx Karl . 1955. The Poverty of Philosophy. New York: Progress Publishers.

  • Misa Thomas J. Philip Brey , and Andrew Feenberg . 2003. Modernity and Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Moreno-Gutierrez Diana . 2016. “The Usage Of Iron For Assyrian Weaponry,” StMU History Media, Sept. 17, online at https://stmuhistorymedia.org/the-usage-of-iron-for-assyrian-weaponry-take-two.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Morillo Stephen and Michael F. Pavkovic . 2018. What is Military History? Medford, MA: Polity Press.

  • Murata Junichi . 2003. “Creativity of Technology: An Origin of Modernity?” in Misa, Brey, and Feenberg 2003227253.

  • Murray Williamson and MacGregor Knox . 2001. “Thinking about Revolutions in Warfare” and “Conclusion: The Future Behind Us,” in The Dynamics of Military Revolution: 1300–2050, edited by MacGregor Knox and Williamson Murray, 1–14 and 175194. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Paret Peter . 1991. “The New Military History,” Parameters 21, no. 33: 1018.

  • Peoples Columba . 2008. “Sputnik and ‘Skill Thinking’ Revisited: Technological Determinism in American Responses to the Soviet Missile Threat,” Cold War History 8, no. 11: 5575.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Perrin Noel . 1979. Giving Up the Gun: Japan’s Reversion to the Sword, 1543–1879. Boston: David R. Godine.

  • Phillips Gervase . 2002. “The Obsolescence of the Arme Blanche and Technological Determinism in British Military History,” War in History 9, no. 11: 3959.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pleiner Radomír and Judith K. Bjorkman . 1974. “The Assyrian Iron Age: The History of Iron in the Assyrian Civilization,” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 118, no. 33: 283313.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Postman Neil . 1992. Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology. New York: Knopf.

  • Raudzens George . 1990. “War-Winning Weapons: The Measurement of Technological Determinism in Military History,” The Journal of Military History 54, no. 44: 403434.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rey Fernando Echeverría . 2010. “Weapons, Technological Determinism, and Ancient Warfare,” in New Perspectives on Ancient Warfare, History of Warfare 59, ed. by Garrett Fagan and Matthew Trundle 2156. Leiden: Brill.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rodger N.A.M. 2013. “The Development of Broadside Gunnery, 1450–1650,” The Mariner’s Mirror 82, no. 33: 301324.

  • Rogers Clifford J. 2011. “The Development of the Longbow in Late Medieval England and ‘Technological Determinism’,” Journal of Medieval History 37, no. 33: 321341.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Roland Alex . 2019. “Is Military Technology Deterministic?Vulcan 7, no. 1: 1933.

  • Sawyer P.H. and R.H. Hilton . 1963. “Technical Determinism: The Stirrup and the Plough,” Past & Present 24: 90100.

  • Schatzberg Eric . 2018. Technology: Critical History of a Concept. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Sherwood John M. 1985. “Engels, Marx, Malthus, and the Machine,” The American Historical Review 90, no. 44: 837865.

  • Smith Meritt Roe , ed. 1985. Military Enterprise and Technological Change: Perspectives on the American Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smith Meritt Roe , ed. and Leo Marx , eds. 1994. Does Technology Drive History? The Dilemma of Technological Determinism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Staudenmaier John M. 1994. “Rationality vs. Contingency in the History of Technology,” in Smith and Marx 1994259270.

  • Stone John . 2012. “The Point of the Bayonet,” Technology and Culture 53, no. 44: 885908.

  • Tyler David . 2003. “The Leverage of Technology: The Evolution of Armed Helicopters in Vietnam,” Military Review 83, no. 44: 3237.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Updike John . 1972. “The Invention of the Horse Collar,” The Transatlantic Review 42/43: 5154.

  • Werrell Kenneth P. 1998. “Did usaf Technology Fail in Vietnam? Three Case Studies,” Airpower Journal 12, no. 11: 8799.

  • White LynnJr . 1962. Medieval Technology and Social Change. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Wright Monte D. and Lawrence J. Paszek . 1971. Science, Technology, and Warfare: The Proceedings of the Third Military History Symposium, United States Air Force Academy, 8–9 May, 1969. [Washington, DC]: Office of Air Force History, Headquarters usaf and United States Air Force Academy.

  • Wyatt Sally . 2008. “Technological Determinism is Dead; Long Live Technological Determinism,” in The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by Hackett Edward J. et al.165180. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zimmerman David . 2019. “Neither Catapults nor Atomic Bombs: Technological Determinism and Military History from a Post-Industrial Revolution Perspective,” Vulcan 7, no. 1: 45–61.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 68 68 10
Full Text Views 7 7 1
PDF Downloads 8 8 2