Explicit and Embedded Environmentalism

Challenging Normativities in the Greening of Religion

In: Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology
View More View Less
  • 1 California State University, USA

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€29.95$34.95

Abstract

The precise influence that religious outlooks have on environmental attitudes and behaviors is a matter of debate among scholars of religion and ecology. While some studies suggest that emergent ecofriendly interpretations of traditional religions offer a promising path for addressing the world’s ecological crisis, others advance more skeptical evaluations about institutional religions’ efficacy in advancing sustainability efforts. In this article I seek to shift the terms of this debate. Whether scholars suggest there is a correlation or insist there is not, these arguments envision environmentalism based on the model of the mainstream, white American environmental movement, assuming that religious environmentalism must entail explicit, concerted efforts to protect the earth. This assumption has led scholars to overlook embedded environmental expressions that are conveyed theologically rather than politically, especially among communities that do not identify with mainstream American environmentalism. By interrogating the assumption that religious environmentalism must involve concerted, political efforts, scholars of religion and ecology can better account for the ways religion influences environmental attitudes and behaviors among religious communities who are not affluent and white.

  • Berry, Evan. 2013. “Religious Environmentalism and Environmental Religion in America.” Religion Compass 7 (10):454–466.

  • Berry, Evan. 2014. “Religion and Sustainability in Global Civil Society.” Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture & Ecology 18 (3):269–288. doi: 10.1163/15685357-01803001.

  • Ellingson, Stephen. 2016. To Care for Creation: The Emergence of the Religious Environmental Movement. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

  • Gebara, Ivone. 1999. Longing for Running Water: Ecofeminism and Liberation. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.

  • Gilliat-Ray, Sophia, and Mark Bryant. 2011. “Are British Muslims ‘Green’? A Survey of British Muslim Environmental Activism.” Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature, and Culture 5 (3):284–306.

  • Gottlieb, Robert. 2005. Forcing the Spring: The Transformation of the American Environmental Movement. 2nd ed. Washington: Island Press.

  • Gottlieb, Roger S. 2006. A Greener Faith: Religious Environmentalism and Our Planet’s Future. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Jones, Robert P., Daniel Cox, and Juhem Navarro-Rivera. 2014. Believers, Sympathizers, and Skeptics: Why Americans are Conflicted about Climate Change, Environmental Policy, and Science. Public Religion Research Institute and American Academy of Religion.

  • Lundberg, Anders Per. 2017. “Constructing the Environment as a Faith Issue: Environmentalists at Work in the Lutheran Church of Sweden.” Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture & Ecology 21 (2):152–174. doi: 10.1163/15685357-02102004.

  • McDuff, Mallory D. 2010. Natural Saints: How People of Faith are Working to Save God’s Earth. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Merchant, Carolyn. 2007. American Environmental History. New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Nagarajan, Vijaya Rettakudi. 1998. “The Earth as Goddess Bhu Devi: Toward a Theory of ‘Embedded Ecologies’ in Folk Hinduism.” In Purifying the Earthly Body of God: Religion and Ecology in HIndu India, edited by Lance E. Nelson, 269–295. Albany: State University of New York Press.

  • Nagarajan, Vijaya Rettakudi. 2000. “Marrying Trees and Generating Auspiciousness.” In Hinduism and Ecology: The Intersection of Earth, Sky, and Water, edited by Christopher Chapple and Mary Evelyn Tucker, 453–468. Boston: Harvard University Press.

  • Smith, Angela M., and Simone Pulver. 2009. “Ethics-Based Environmentalism in Practice: Religious-Environmental Organizations in the United States.” Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture & Ecology 13 (2):145–179. doi: 10.1163/156853509x438580.

  • Taylor, Bron. 2011. “Editor’s Introduction: Toward a Robust Scientific Investigation of the ‘Religion’ Variable in the Quest for Sustainability.” Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature & Culture 5 (3):252–263.

  • Taylor, Bron, Gretel Van Wieren, and Bernard Zaleha. 2016. “The Greening of Religion Hypothesis (Part Two): Assessing the Data from Lynn White, Jr, to Pope Francis.” Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature & Culture 10 (3):306–378. doi: 10.1558/jsrnc.v10i3.29011.

  • Taylor, Dorceta E. 2014. The State of Diversity in Environmental Organizations: Mainstream NGOs, Foundations, Government Agencies. Green 2.0.

  • Taylor, Sarah McFarland. 2007. Green Sisters: A Spiritual Ecology. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

  • Tomalin, Emma. 2009. Biodivinity and Biodiversity: the Limits to Religious Environmentalism. Farnham, England; Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

  • Tucker, Mary Evelyn. 2003. Worldly Wonder: Religions Enter their Ecological Phase. Chicago: Open Court.

  • White, Lynn, Jr. 1967. “The Historical Roots of Our Ecologic Crisis.” Science 155 (3767):1203–1207.

  • Whittaker, Matthew, Gary M. Segura, and Shaun Bowler. 2005. “Racial/Ethnic Group Attitudes toward Environmental Protection in California: Is “Environmentalism” Still a White Phenomenon?” Political Research Quarterly 58 (3):435–447.

  • Ybarra, Priscilla Solis. 2016. Writing the Goodlife: Mexican American Literature and the Environment Tuscon: The University of Arizona Press.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 481 225 13
Full Text Views 72 30 5
PDF Views & Downloads 75 48 9