In this book, Amr Osman seeks to expand and re-interpret what we know about the history and doctrine of the Ẓāhirī
madhhab. Based on an extensive prosopographical survey, he concludes that the founder, Dāwūd al-Ẓāhirī, was closer in profile and doctrine to the
Ahl al-Ra’y than to the
Ahl al-Ḥadīth. Furthermore, Ibn Ḥazm al-Andalusī may have had a damaging effect on the
madhhab, which never actually developed into a full-fledged school of law. By examining the meaning of ‘
ẓāhir’ and modern scholarship on ‘literalism’, he challenges the view that Ẓāhirism was literalist, proposing ‘textualism’ as an accurate reflection of its premises, methodology, and goals as a hermeneutical and legal theory.
Amr Osman, Ph.D. (2010), Princeton University, is Assistant Professor of Islamic History at Qatar University. His publications include
Adalat al-Sahaba: The Construction of a Religious Doctrine, and
Human Intervention in Divine Speech: The Waqf Rules and the Redaction of the Qur’anic Text.
The Zạ̄hirī Madhhab makes an incisive contribution to the history of Islamic law generally and the Zạ̄hirī
madhhab in particular. Readers should find Osman’s comprehensive discussion of the origin and development of the Zạ̄hirī tradition, as well as his elaborate biographies of Dāwūd al-Zạ̄ hirī and Ibn Ḥazm, rich, lucid and highly informative.
Mourad Laabdi in
Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations 27.3 (2015), 345-347.
Part One: The History of the Ẓāhirī Madhhab Ch. One: Dāwūd al-Ẓāhirī and the Beginnings of the Ẓāhirī
Madhhab Ch. Two: The Spread and Retreat of the Ẓāhirī
Part Two: Ẓāhirism: A Critical Review Ch. Three: Jurisprudence in Third/Ninth-Century Baghdad
Ch. Four: Ẓāhirism between the
Ahl al-Ra’y and the
Ahl al-Ḥadīth Ch. Five: Ẓāhirism, Literalism and Textualism
Ch. Six: Case Studies
All interested specifically in the Ẓāhirī
madhhab and generally in Islamic law and legal history, as well as those interested in comparative legal and religious hermeneutics.