Islamic Jurisprudence on the Regulation of Armed Conflict: Text and Context, Nesrine Badawi argues against the existence of a ‘true’ interpretation of the rules of regulation armed conflict in Islam. In a survey of formative and modern seminal legal works on the subject, the author offers a detailed examination of the internal deductive structures of those key juristic works on the subject and elaborates on different methodological inconsistencies in them to shed light on the role played by the socio-political context in the development of Islamic jurisprudence.
Nesrine Badawi, Ph.D (2011), School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, is an Assistant Professor of Public and International Law at the American University in Cairo. Her work focuses on the regulation of armed conflict in Islamic law.
Table of contents
Introduction 1 How Do We Study Islamic Legal History? 2 Indeterminacy in Islamic Jurisprudence on the Regulation of Armed Conflict 3 Primary Concerns of Classical Jurisprudence 1 Islamic Jurisprudence in the Expansive Empire 1 Al-Shaybānī: a Jurist-Judge 2 Al-Shāfiʿī and the Exclusionary Project 3 Conclusion 2 The Muslim World at the Frontiers: Al-Andalus Section One: Andalusī Jurisprudence 1 Al-Andalus: Loss of Muslim Power 2 Ibn Ḥazm and the Ṭāʿīfa States 3 The Jurist-Judge in al-Andalus: Ibn Rushd al-Jadd 4 Remarks on Andalusī Jurisprudence Section Two: the Mongol “Threat” 5 Ibn Taymiyya and “Quasi”-Muslims 3 Mainstream Narratives 1 Official Institutions 2 Mainstream Independent Scholarship 3 Mainstream Scholarship: a New Consensus? 4 Contemporary Militant Approaches 1 The Complexity of Militant Literature 2 al-Qāʿida Debated 3 ISIS: the “Fear Doctrine” 4 Militant Groups: Concluding Remarks Conclusion: Authority and the Classical Tradition 1 Personal Raʾy: Employed by Its Critics 2 Modern Projects: Eclectic Approaches to Classical Legal Authority 3 Modern Institutions: What Can They Do?
All interested in the study of Islamic regulation of armed conflict and development of Islamic law.