Reading Aristotle: Argument and Exposition argues that Aristotle’s treatises must be approached as progressive unfoldings of a unified position that may extend over a single book, an entire treatise, or across several works. Contributors demonstrate that Aristotle relies on both explanatory and expository principles. Explanatory principles include familiar doctrines such as the four causes, actuality’s priority over potentiality and nature’s doing nothing in vain. Expository principles are at least as important. They pertain to proper sequence, pedagogical method, the role of reputable views and the opinions of predecessors, the equivocity of key explanatory terms, and the need to scrupulously observe distinctions between the different sciences. A sensitivity to expository principles is crucial to understanding both particular arguments and entire treatises.
William Wians, Ph.D., (Professor of Philosophy at Merrimack College and adjunct professor at Boston College) writes on ancient philosophy. His edited collection
Logos and Muthos: Philosophical Essays in Greek Literature was published by SUNY Press. A second volume is in preparation.
Ron Polansky, Ph.D., (Professor of Philosophy and Chair, Duquesne University) has published on Plato, Aristotle, Hobbes, Descartes, Locke, and medical ethics, including monographs on Plato’s
Theaetetus and Aristotle’s
De Anima, and edited collections on Aristotle’s
Nicomachean Ethics and bioethics. He has edited the journal
Ancient Philosophy (Mathesis Publications) for thirty-six years.
Table of contents
Abbreviations About the Contributors
Introduction William Wians and Ron Polansky
Ways of Proving in Aristotle Marco Zingano
Aristotle’s Scientific Method Edward C. Halper
Aristotle’s Problemata-Style and Aural Textuality Diana Quarantotto
Natural Things and Body: The Investigations of Physics Helen Lang
Surrogate Principles and the Natural Order of Exposition in Aristotle’s De CaeloII Mariska Leunissen
Arrangement and Exploratory Discourse in the Parva Naturalia Philip van der Eijk
The Place of De Motu in Aristotle’s Natural Philosophy Andrea Falcon
Is Aristotle’s Account of Sexual Differentiation Inconsistent? William Wians
The Concept of Ousia in Metaphysics Alpha, Beta and Gamma Vasilis Politis and Jun Su
Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics is a Work of Practical Science Ron Polansky
Aristotle on the (Alleged) Inferiority of History to Poetry Thornton C. Lockwood
Aristotle on the Best Tragic Plot: Re-reading Poetics 13–14 Malcolm Heath
Students, scholars, and libraries interested in how one must approach the writings of Aristotle, including treatises on logic, natural science, metaphysics, ethics, and poetics, and the nature of his method.